Care and stewardship: From home to planet

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 100, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 321-323

  Nassauer, Joan Iverson ^a  

^a Universiry of Michigan   (United States)

Author keywords

Culture; Development; Ecosystem services; Landscape change; Maintenance; Perception; Sustainability science

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953057021     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.022     Document Type: Note

References (23)

1. Asakawa S., Yoshida K., Yabe K. Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the greenway system of Sapporo, Japan. Landscape Urban Plan. 2004, 68:167-182.
2. Burel F., Baudry J. Social, aesthetic, and ecological aspects of hedgerows in rural landscape as a framework for greenways. Landscape Urban Plan. 1995, 33:327-332.
3. Coeterier J.F. Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landscape Urban Plan. 1996, 34:27-44.
4. Daniel T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape Urban Plan. 2001, 54:267-281.
5. Decamps H. How a riparian landscape finds form and comes alive. Landscape Urban Plan. 2001, 57:169-175.
6. Gobster P.H., Westphal L.M. The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences. Landscape Urban Plan. 2004, 68:147-165.
7. Gobster P.H., Nassauer J.I., Daniel T.C., Fry G. The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?. Lansdcape Ecol 2007, 22:959-972.
8. Hands D.E., Brown R.D. Enhancing visual preference of ecological rehabilitation sites. Landscape Urban Plan. 2002, 58:57-70.
9. Helfand G.E., Sik Park J., Nassauer J.I., Kosek S. The economics of native plants in residential landscape designs. Landscape Urban Plan. 2005, 78:229-240.
10. Jorgensen A., Hitchmough J., Calvert T. Woodland spaces and edges: their impact on perception of safety and preference. Landscape Urban Plan. 2002, 60:135-150.
11. Jorgensen A., Hitchmough J., Dunnett N. Woodland as a setting for housing-appreciation and fear and the contribution to residential satisfaction and place identity in Warrington New Town, UK. Landscape Urban Plan. 2007, 79:273-287.
12. Kaplan R., Austin M.E. Out in the country: sprawl and the quest for nature nearby. Landscape Urban Plan. 2004, 69:235-243.
13. Lewis J.L. Perceptions of landscape change in a rural British Columbia community. Landscape Urban Plan. 2008, 85(1):49-59.
14. Lindemann-Matthies P., Bose E. Species richness, structural diversity and species composition in meadows created by visitors of a botanical garden in Switzerland. Landscape Urban Plan. 2007, 79:298-307.
15. Nassauer J.I. The aesthetics of horticulture: neatness as a form of care. Hort. Sci. 1988, 23:973-977.
16. Nassauer J.I. Landscape care: perceptions of local people in landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Land Use Plan. 1988, 8:27-41. Am. Soc. Landscape Architects, Washington, DC.
17. Nassauer J.I. The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecol. 1992, 6:239-250.
18. Nassauer J.I. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape J. 1995, 14:161-170.
19. Nassauer J.I. Cultural sustainability: aligning aesthetics and ecology. Placing Nature: Culture and Landscape Ecology 1997, 65-84. Island Press, Washington, DC. J.I. Nassauer (Ed.).
20. Nassauer J.I. Monitoring the success of metropolitan wetland restorations: Cultural sustainability and ecological function. Wetlands 2004, 24:756-765.
21. Nassauer J.I., Wang Z., Dayrell E. What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landscape Urban Plan. 2009, 92:282-292.
22. Nisbett R., Wilson T. The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1977, 35:250-256.
23. Todorova A., Asakawa S., Aikoh T. Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan. Landscape Urban Plan. 2004, 69:403-416.