Evaluating depth perception of photorealistic Mixed Reality visualizations for occluded objects in outdoor environments

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 211-218

  Dey, Arindam ^a   Cunningham, Andrew ^a   Sandor, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Depth cues; Depth perception; Evaluation; Handheld; Mixed reality; Photorealistic visualization

Indexed keywords

DEPTH CUES; EVALUATION; HANDHELDS; MIXED REALITY; PHOTO-REALISTIC;

AUGMENTED REALITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; TIME VARYING SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES; VISUALIZATION;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 79953055629     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1889863.1889911     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. AVERY, B., THOMAS, B. H., AND PIEKARSKI, W. 2008. User evaluation of see-through vision for mobile outdoor augmented reality. In ISMAR '08: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 69-72.
2. AVERY, B., SANDOR, C., AND THOMAS, B. H. 2009. Improving spatial perception for augmented reality x-ray vision. In VR '09: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality, IEEE, 79-82.
3. HART, S., AND STAVELAND, L. 1988. Development of NASATLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human mental workload 1, 139-183.
4. HOWARD, I., AND ROGERS, B. 2002. Seeing in Depth, vol. 2. I Porteous, University of Torento Press.
5. INTERRANTE, V., ANDERSON, L., AND RIES, B. 2004. An experimental investigation of distance perception in real vs. immersive virtual environments via direct blind walking in a high-fidelity model of the same room. In APGV '04: Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 162-162.
6. JONES, J. A., SWAN, J., SINGH, G., KOLSTAD, E., AND ELLIS, S. R. 2008. The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception. In APGV '08: Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9-14.
7. KNAPP, J., AND LOOMIS, J. 2004. Limited field of view of headmounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 13, 5, 572-577. (Pubitemid 39580071)
8. LIVINGSTON, M. A., SWAN, J., GABBARD, J. L., HÖ LLERER, T. H., HIX, D., JULIER, S. J., BAILLOT, Y., AND BROWN, D. 2003. Resolving multiple occluded layers in augmented reality. In ISMAR '03: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 56.
9. LIVINGSTON, M., ZANBAKA, C., SWAN, J., AND SMALLMAN, H. 2005. Objective measures for the effectiveness of augmented reality. VR '05: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality (Poster Session), 287-288. (Pubitemid 41731750)
10. LIVINGSTON, M. A., AI, Z., SWAN, J., AND SMALLMAN, H. S. 2009. Indoor vs. outdoor depth perception for mobile augmented reality. In VR '09: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 55-62.
11. MESSING, R., AND DURGIN, F. H. 2005. Distance perception and the visual horizon in head-mounted displays. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2, 3, 234-250.
12. PLUMERT, J. M., KEARNEY, J. K., CREMER, J. F., AND RECKER, K. 2005. Distance perception in real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2, 3, 216-233.
13. SANDOR, C., CUNNINGHAM, A., ECK, U., URQUHART, D., JARVIS, G., DEY, A., BARBIER, S., MARNER, M., AND RHEE, S. 2010. Egocentric space-distorting visualizations for rapid environment exploration in mobile mixed reality. In VR 2010: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality, 47-50.
14. SURDICK, R., DAVIS, E., KING, R., AND HODGES, L. 1997. The perception of distance in simulated visual displays: A comparison of the effectiveness and accuracy of multiple depth cues across viewing distances. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 5, 513-531.
15. SWAN, J. I., LIVINGSTON, M. A., SMALLMAN, H. S., BROWN, D., BAILLOT, Y., GABBARD, J. L., AND HIX, D. 2006. A perceptual matching technique for depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality. In VR '06: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 19-26.
16. SWAN, J., JONES, A., KOLSTAD, E., LIVINGSTON, M., AND SMALLMAN, H. 2007. Egocentric depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 3, 429-442. (Pubitemid 46479762)
17. TSUDA, T., YAMAMOTO, H., KAMEDA, Y., AND OHTA, Y. 2005. Visualization methods for outdoor see-through vision. In ICAT '05: Proceedings of the International Conference on Augmented Tele-Existence, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 62-69.
18. WAGNER, D., AND SCHMALSTIEG, D. 2006. Handheld augmented reality displays. In VR '06: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 321.
19. WITHER, J., AND HOLLERER, T. 2005. Pictorial depth cues for outdoor augmented reality. In ISWC '05: Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 92-99. (Pubitemid 44867500)