Feasibility study of a cyclic anoxic/aerobic two-stage MBR for treating ABS resin manufacturing wastewater

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 5325-5330

  Chang, Chia Yuan ^a   Tanong, Kulchaya ^a   Chiemchaisri, Chart ^b   Vigneswaran, Saravanamuthu ^c  

^a CHIA NAN UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

^b KASETSART UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

ABS wastewater; Anoxic aerobic phase fraction; Membrane bioreactor; Sludge production

Indexed keywords

ABS WASTEWATER; ANOXIC/AEROBIC; CLEANING METHODS; COD REMOVAL; DEGRADATION RATE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATERS; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; NITRITATION; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; SEM IMAGE; SLUDGE PRODUCTION; TREATMENT EFFICIENCY; TWO STAGE;

ABS RESINS; BIOCONVERSION; BIOREACTORS; DEGRADATION; INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT; REMOVAL; RESINS; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT;

NITROGEN; RESIN;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MEMBRANE; NITROGEN; OXIC CONDITIONS; RESIN; SLUDGE; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; NITRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SLUDGE; WASTE WATER;

ACRYLIC RESINS; AEROBIOSIS; ANAEROBIOSIS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOREACTORS; BUTADIENES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; NITROGEN; POLYSTYRENES; SEWAGE; VOLATILIZATION; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 79953055396     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.116     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ahn K.H., Song K.G., Cho E., Cho J., Yun H., Lee S., Kim J. Enhanced biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal using a sequencing anoxic/anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAM) process. Desalination 2003, 157:345-352.
2. Antileo C., Werner A., Ciudad G., Munoz C., Bornhardt C., Jeison D., Urrutia H. Novel operational strategy for partial nitrification to nitrite in a sequencing batch rotating disk reactor. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 32:69-78.
3. APHA, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed., Washington DC, USA.
4. Chang C.Y., Chang J.S., Erdei L., Vigneswaran S. Quantification of air stripping and biodegradation of the organic removal in acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) industry wastewater during submerged membrane bioreactor operation. Desalination 2006, 191:162-168.
5. Chang J.S., Chang C.Y., Erdei L., Vigneswaran S. Long-term operation of submerged membrane bioreactor for the treatment of high strength acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) wastewater: effect of hydraulic retention time. Desalination 2006, 191:45-51.
6. Cho J., Song K.G., Lee S.H., Ahn K.H. Sequencing anoxic/anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAM) pilot plant for advanced wastewater treatment. Desalination 2005, 178:219-225.
7. Chuang H.G., Ohashi A., Imachi H., Tandukar M., Harada H. Effective partial nitrification to nitrite by down-flow hanging sponge reactor. Water Res. 2007, 41:295-302.
8. Cicek N., Macomber J., Davel J., Suidan M.T., Audic J., Genestet P. Effect of solids retention time on the performance and biological characteristics of a membrane bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43:43-50.
9. Ghyoot W., Verstraete W. Reduced sludge production in a two-stage membrane-assisted bioreactor. Water Res. 2000, 34:205-215.
10. Jacob S., Ahmed A.E. Effect of route of administration on the disposition of acrylonitrile: quantitative whole-body autoradiographic study in rats. Pharm. Res. 2003, 48(5):479-488.
11. Johannsen F.R., Levinskas G.J. Comparative chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of acrylonitrile by drinking water and oral intubation to Spartan® Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 132:197-219.
12. Laera G., Pollice A., Saturno D., Giordano C., Lopez A. Zero net growth in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention. Water Res. 2005, 39:5241-5249.
13. Liu R., Chen L., Wen X., Qian Y. Operational performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor for reclamation of bath wastewater. Process Biochem. 2004, 40:125-130.
14. Malamis S., Andreadakis A. Fractionation of proteins and carbohydrates of extracellular polymeric substances in a membrane bioreactor system. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:3350-3357.
15. Metcalf, Eddy Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse 2003, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA. fourth ed.
16. Muller E.B., Stouthamer A.H., van Verseveld H.W., Eikelboom D.H. Aerobic domestic waste water treatment in a pilot plant with complete sludge retention by cross-flow filtration. Water Res. 1995, 29:1179-1189.
17. Peng Y.Z., Zhu G.B. Biological nitrogen removal with nitrification and denitrification via nitrite pathway. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 73:15-26.
18. Pollice A., Laera G., Blonda M. Biomass growth and activity in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention. Water Res. 2004, 38:1799-1808.
19. Rosenberger S., Witzig R., Manz W., Szewzyk U., Kraume M. Operation of different membrane bioreactors: experimental results and physiological state of the micro-organisms. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41:269-277.
20. Tazi-Pain A., Schrotter J.C., Bord G., Payreaudeau M., Buisson H. Recent improvement of the BIOSEP® process for industrial and municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination 2002, 146:439-443.
21. Terada A., Yamamoto T., Hibiya K., Tsuneda S., Hirata A. Enhancement of biofilm formation onto surface-modified hollow-fiber membranes and its application to a membrane aerated biofilm reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 49:263-268.
22. Wagner J., Rosenwinkel K.-H. Sludge production in membrane bioreactors under different conditions. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41:251-258.
23. Wang Y.L., Yu S.L., Shi W.X., Bao R.L., Zhao Q., Zuo X.T. Comparative performance between intermittently cyclic activated sludge-membrane bioreactor and anoxic/aerobic-membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:3877-3881.
24. Wever H.D., Weiss S., Reemtsma T., Vereecken J., Muller J., Knepper T., Rorden O., Gonzalez S., Barcelo D., Hernando M.D. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2007, 41:935-945.
25. Wyffels S., Van Hulle S.W.H., Boeckx P., Volcke E.I.P., Van Cleemput O., Vanrolleghem P.A., Verstraete W. Modeling and simulation of oxygen-limited partial nitritation in a membrane-assisted bioreactor (MBR). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 86:531-542.
26. Yamamoto K., Hiasa M., Mahmood T., Matsuo T. Direct solid-liquid separation using hollow fiber membrane in an activated sludge aeration tank. Water Sci. Technol. 1989, 21:43-54.
27. Yeum I.T., Nah Y.M., Anh K.H. Treatment of household wastewater using an intermittently aerated membrane bioreactor. Desalination 1999, 124:193-203.
28. Yoo I.K., Lim K.J., Lee W.S., Kim D.J., Cha G.C. Study on operational factors in a nitrite-accumulating submerged membrane bioreactor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 16:469-474.
29. Yoon S.-H., Kim H.-S., Yeom I.-T. The optimum operational condition of membrane bioreactor (MBR): cost estimation of aeration and sludge treatment. Water Res. 2004, 38:37-46.