Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: An ERP study

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 356-363

  Gootjes, Liselotte ^a   Coppens, Leonora C ^a   Zwaan, Rolf A ^a   Franken, Ingmar H A ^a   Van Strien, Jan W ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attentional bias; Emotion word Stroop task; Emotional interference; Event related potentials; Healthy subjects; LPP; N400; Recent word exposure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EMOTION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STROOP TEST; VERBAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

AROUSAL; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMOTIONS; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; READING; STROOP TEST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953037019     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bar-Haim Y., Lamy D., Pergamin L., Bakermans-Kranenburg M.J., van IJzendoorn M.H. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychol. Bull. 2007, 133(1):1-24.
2. Bernat E., Bunce S., Shevrin H. Event-related brain potentials differentiate positive and negative mood adjectives during both supraliminal and subliminal visual processing. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2001, 42(1):11-34.
3. Bradley M.M., Lang P.J. Affective norms for English words (ANEW): instruction manual and affective ratings. On Technical Report C-1: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida 1999.
4. Carretié L., Mercado F., Tapia M., Hinojosa J.A. Emotion, attention, and the [']negativity bias', studied through event-related potentials. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2001, 41(1):75-85.
5. Dietrich D.E., Waller C., Johannes S., Wieringa B.M., Emrich H.M., Munte T.F. Differential effects of emotional content on event-related potentials in word recognition memory. Neuropsychobiology 2001, 43(2):96-101.
6. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Kopell B.S. The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science 1981, 214(4523):938-940.
7. Evans K.M., Federmeier K.D. The memory that's right and the memory that's left: event-related potentials reveal hemispheric asymmetries in the encoding and retention of verbal information. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(8):1777-1790.
8. Franken I.H., Gootjes L., van Strien J.W. Automatic processing of emotional words during an emotional Stroop task. NeuroReport 2009, 20(8):776-781.
9. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1983, 55(4):468-484.
10. Ilan A.B., Polich J. P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 110(2):367-373.
11. Inaba M., Nomura M., Ohira H. Neural evidence of effects of emotional valence on word recognition. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2005, 57(3):165-173.
12. Inaba M., Kamishima K., Ohira H. An electrophysiological comparison of recollection for emotional words using an exclusion recognition paradigm. Brain Res. 2007, 1133(1):100-109.
13. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980, 207(4427):203-205.
14. Lang P.J., Davis M. Emotion, motivation, and the brain: reflex foundations in animal and human research. Prog. Brain Res. 2006, 156:3-29.
15. Liotti M., Woldorff M.G., Perez R., Mayberg H.S. An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(5):701-711.
16. Maratos E.J., Allan K., Rugg M.D. Recognition memory for emotionally negative and neutral words: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(11):1452-1465.
17. Markela-Lerenc J., Ille N., Kaiser S., Fiedler P., Mundt C., Weisbrod M. Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: which comes first?. Cogn. Brain Res. 2004, 18(3):278-287.
18. McKenna F.P., Sharma D. Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2004, 30(2):382-392.
19. McNeely H.E., Lau M.A., Christensen B.K., Alain C. Neurophysiological evidence of cognitive inhibition anomalies in persons with major depressive disorder. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119(7):1578-1589.
20. Molinaro N., Carreiras M. Electrophysiological evidence of interaction between contextual expectation and semantic integration during the processing of collocations. Biol. Psychol. 2010, 83:176-190.
21. Phaf R.H., Kan K.J. The automaticity of emotional Stroop: a meta-analysis. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 2007, 38(2):184-199.
22. Roehm D., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I., Rösler F., Schlesewsky M. To predict or not to predict: influences of task and strategy on the processing of semantic relations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:1259-1274.
23. Rugg M.D., Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11(6):251-257.
24. Rugg M.D., Mark R.E., Walla P., Schloerscheidt A.M., Birch C.S., Allan K. Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature 1998, 392(6676):595-598.
25. Sass S.M., Heller W., Stewart J.L., Silton R.L., Edgar J.C., Fisher J.E., et al. Time course of attentional bias in anxiety: emotion and gender specificity. Psychophysiology 2010, 47:247-259.
26. Schupp H.T., Cuthbert B.N., Bradley M.M., Hillman C.H., Hamm A.O., Lang P.J. Brain processes in emotional perception: motivated attention. Cogn. Emotion 2004, 18(5). pp.
27. Scott G.G., O'Donnell P.J., Leuthold H., Sereno S.C. Early emotion word processing: evidence from event-related potentials. Biol. Psychol. 2009, 80(1):95-104.
28. Stewart J.L., Levin Silton R., Sass S.M., Fisher J.E., Edgar J.C., Heller W., Miller G.A. Attentional bias to negative emotion as a function of approach and withdrawal anger styles: an ERP investigation. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2010, 76:9-18.
29. Taake I., Jaspers-Fayer F., Liotti M. Early frontal responses elicited by physical threat words in an emotional Stroop task: modulation by anxiety sensitivity. Biol. Psychol. 2009, 81(1):48-57.
30. Thomas S.J., Johnstone S.J., Gonsalvez C.J. Event-related potentials during an emotional Stroop task. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 63(3):221-231.
31. Turken A.U., Swick D. Response selection in the human anterior cingulate cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2(10):920-924.
32. Van der Ploeg H.M., Defares P.B., Spielberger C.D. Handleiding bij de Zelf-Beoordelings Vragenlijst: Een nederlandstalige bewering van de Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 1980, Swets & Zeitlinger B.V, Lisse.
33. van Hooff J.C., Dietz K.C., Sharma D., Bowman H. Neural correlates of intrusion of emotion words in a modified Stroop task. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2008, 67(1):23-34.
34. Van Strien J.W., Hagenbeek R.E., Stam C.J., Rombouts S.A., Barkhof F. Changes in brain electrical activity during extended continuous word recognition. Neuroimage 2005, 26(3):952-959.
35. Van Strien J.W., De Sonneville L.M.J., Franken I.H.A. The late positive potential and explicit versus implicit processing of facial valence. NeuroReport 2010, 21(9):656-661.
36. Waters A.J., Sayette M.A., Franken I.H., Schwartz J.E. Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task. Behav. Res. Ther. 2005, 43(6):715-732.
37. West R., Alain C. Event-related neural activity associated with the Stroop task. Cogn. Brain Res. 1999, 8(2):157-164.
38. Williams J.M., Broadbent K. Distraction by emotional stimuli: use of a Stroop task with suicide attempters. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 1986, 25(Pt 2):101-110.
39. Williams J.M., Mathews A., MacLeod C. The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol. Bull. 1996, 120(1):3-24.
40. Windmann S., Kutas M. Electrophysiological correlates of emotion-induced recognition bias. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2001, 13(5):577-592.