To predict or not to predict: Influences of task and strategy on the processing of semantic relations

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1259-1274

  Roehm, Dietmar ^a   Bornkessel Schlesewsky, Ina ^a   Rösler, Frank ^b   Schlesewsky, Matthias ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONALITY TEST; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SEMANTIC MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MENTAL PROCESSES; PROBABILITY; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 34547647321     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1259     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bentin, S. (1987). Event-related potentials, semantic processes, and expectancy factors in word recognition. Brain and Language, 31, 308-327.
2. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision, and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-355.
3. Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1999). ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: Time course and scalp distribution. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 235-260.
4. Chwilla, D. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Mulder, G. (2000). Mediated priming in the lexical decision task: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction time. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 314-341.
5. Connolly, J. F., & Phillips, N. A. (1994). Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 256-266.
6. Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). ERPs and domain specificity: Beating a straw horse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 653-372.
7. Curran, T., Tucker, D. M., Kutas, M., & Posner, M. I. (1993). Topography of the N400: Brain electrical activity reflecting semantic expectancy. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 188-209.
8. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context-updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 355-372.
9. Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 469-495.
10. Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., Mecklinger, A., & Meyer, M. (1998). Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology, 47, 193-221.
11. Frisch, S., Kotz, S. A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Why the P600 is not just a P300: The role of the basal ganglia. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 336-340.
12. Gaermer, F. S., Schlesewsky, M., Roehm, D., Friederici, A. D., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (submitted). The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language comprehension architecture.
13. Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76.
14. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438-441.
15. Holcomb, P. (1988). Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming. Brain and Language, 35, 66-85.
16. Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1970). Conditions under which the mean-square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1582-1589.
17. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463-469.
19. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.