Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: Comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 426-435

  Westermann, Yvonne ^a   Geigenmüller, Anja ^a   Elgeti, Thomas ^a   Wagner, Moritz ^a   Dushe, Simon ^a   Borges, Adrian C ^a   Dohmen, Pascal M ^a   Hein, Patrick A ^a   Lembcke, Alexander ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aortic valve stenosis; Computed tomography; Echocardiography; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART VALVE STENOSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 79953025882     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. R.O. Bonow, B.A. Carabello, and C. Kanu ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Circulation 114 2006 e84 e231
2. H. Alkadhi, S. Wildermuth, and A. Plass Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography Radiology 240 2006 47 55 (Pubitemid 43904342)
3. E. Bouvier, D. Logeart, and J.L. Sablayrolles Diagnosis of aortic valvular stenosis by multislice cardiac computed tomography Eur Heart J 27 2006 3033 3038 (Pubitemid 44950448)
4. G.M. Feuchtner, W. Dichtl, and G.J. Friedrich Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity J Am Coll Cardiol 47 2006 1410 1417
5. G.M. Feuchtner, S. Muller, and J. Bonatti Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 2007 197 203 (Pubitemid 46983211)
6. H. Tanaka, K. Shimada, K. Yoshida, S. Jissho, J. Yoshikawa, and M. Yoshiyama The simultaneous assessment of aortic valve area and coronary artery stenosis using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis comparison with echocardiography Circ J 71 2007 1593 1598 (Pubitemid 47529662)
7. J.P. Laissy, D. Messika-Zeitoun, and J.M. Serfaty Comprehensive evaluation of preoperative patients with aortic valve stenosis: usefulness of cardiac multidetector computed tomography Heart 93 2007 1121 1125 (Pubitemid 47310995)
8. M. Habis, B. Daoud, and V.L. Roger Comparison of 64-slice computed tomography planimetry and Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis J Heart Valve Dis 16 2007 216 224 (Pubitemid 46881479)
9. A.C. Pouleur, J.B. le Polain de Waroux, and A. Pasquet Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography Radiology 244 2007 745 754 (Pubitemid 47292085)
10. A. Lembcke, H. Thiele, and H. Lachnitt Precision of forty slice spiral computed tomography for quantifying aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography and validation against cardiac catheterization Invest Radiol 43 2008 719 728
11. A. Lembcke, D.E. Kivelitz, and A.C. Borges Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization Invest Radiol 44 2009 7 14
12. A. Lembcke, M. Woinke, and A.C. Borges Grading of aortic valve stenosis at 64-slice spiral computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography and calibration against cardiac catheterization Invest Radiol 44 6 2009 360 368
13. T.M. LaBounty, B. Sundaram, P. Agarwal, W.A. Armstrong, E.A. Kazerooni, and E. Yamada Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis AJR 191 2008 1652 1658
14. M. Dewey, M. Laule, and L. Krug Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses Invest Radiol 39 2004 223 229 (Pubitemid 38391787)
15. M. Dewey, M. Muller, and F. Teige Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for assessment of regional and global left ventricular myocardial function Invest Radiol 41 2006 400 409 (Pubitemid 44284202)
16. R. Rosenhek, T. Binder, and G. Porenta Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis N Engl J Med 343 2000 611 617 (Pubitemid 30659472)
17. M.A. Quinones, C.M. Otto, and M. Stoddard Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15 2002 167 184
18. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 1986 307 310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
19. T. Buck, P. Hunold, and K.U. Wentz Tomographic three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of chamber size and systolic function in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging, cineventriculography, and two-dimensional echocardiography Circulation 96 1997 4286 4297 (Pubitemid 28007457)
20. S.R. Cannon, K.L. Richards, and M. Crawford Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula Circulation 71 1985 1170 1178 (Pubitemid 15036364)
21. J. Segal, D.J. Lerner, and D.C. Miller When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula?: variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states J Am Coll Cardiol 9 1987 1294 1305 (Pubitemid 17083528)
22. J.C. Tardif, A.G. Rodrigues, and J.F. Hardy Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis J Am Coll Cardiol 29 1997 1296 1302 (Pubitemid 27201949)
23. O. Axler, C. Tousignant, and C.R. Thompson Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic, fick, and thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients J Crit Care 11 1996 109 116 (Pubitemid 26385442)
24. V.K. Dhingra, J.C. Fenwick, K.R. Walley, D.R. Chittock, and J.J. Ronco Lack of agreement between thermodilution and fick cardiac output in critically ill patients Chest 122 2002 990 997
25. J. Gonzalez, C. Delafosse, and M. Fartoukh Comparison of bedside measurement of cardiac output with the thermodilution method and the Fick method in mechanically ventilated patients Crit Care 7 2003 171 178 (Pubitemid 36432676)
26. W.A. Schobel, W. Voelker, and K.K. Haase Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis Eur Heart J 20 1999 1355 1363 (Pubitemid 29429722)
27. M.E. Assey, M.R. Zile, and B.W. Usher Effect of catheter positioning on the variability of measured gradient in aortic stenosis Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 30 1993 287 292 (Pubitemid 23360062)
28. H. Berglund, C.J. Kim, and T. Nishioka Influence of ejection fraction and valvular regurgitation on the accuracy of aortic valve area determination Echocardiography 18 2001 65 72 (Pubitemid 32171691)
29. L.N. Scotten, D.K. Walker, and J.W. Dutton Modified Gorlin equation for the diagnosis of mixed aortic valve pathology J Heart Valve Dis 11 2002 360 368 (Pubitemid 34578452)
30. H. Omran, H. Schmidt, and M. Hackenbroch Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study Lancet 361 2003 1241 1246 (Pubitemid 36428577)
31. D. de Bono Complications of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation: results from 34,041 patients in the United Kingdom confidential enquiry into cardiac catheter complications. The Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians of London Br Heart J 70 1993 297 300 (Pubitemid 23276249)
32. J. Gwost, T. Stoebe, and E. Chesler Analysis of the complications of cardiac catheterization over nine years Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 8 1982 13 21 (Pubitemid 12106613)
33. A. Geibel, L. Gornandt, and W. Kasper Reproducibility of Doppler echocardiographic quantification of aortic and mitral valve stenoses: comparison between two echocardiography centers Am J Cardiol 67 1991 1013 1021
34. J.L. Fischer, T. Haberer, and D. Dickson Comparison of Doppler echocardiographic methods with heart catheterisation in assessing aortic valve area in 100 patients with aortic stenosis Br Heart J 73 1995 293 298
35. I.G. Burwash, A.S. Pearlman, and C.D. Kraft Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise J Am Coll Cardiol 24 1994 1342 1350 (Pubitemid 24331876)
36. J. Niederberger, H. Schima, and G. Maurer Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro Circulation 94 1996 1934 1940 (Pubitemid 26349308)
37. R. Danielsen, J.E. Nordrehaug, and H. Vik-Mo Factors affecting Doppler echocardiographic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis Am J Cardiol 63 1989 1107 1111 (Pubitemid 19117514)
38. R. Hoffmann, F.A. Flachskampf, and P. Hanrath Planimetry of orifice area in aortic stenosis using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography J Am Coll Cardiol 22 1993 529 534 (Pubitemid 23214568)
39. Y. Bernard, N. Meneveau, and A. Vuillemenot Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis Heart 78 1997 68 73 (Pubitemid 27346884)
40. K. Debl, B. Djavidani, and J. Seitz Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging Invest Radiol 40 2005 631 636 (Pubitemid 41384053)
41. H. Baumgartner Is there a role for multislice computed tomography in aortic stenosis? Eur Heart J 27 2006 2923 2924
42. J. Hausleiter, T. Meyer, and M. Hadamitzky Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates Circulation 113 2006 1305 1310 (Pubitemid 43739452)