Detecting age differences in resistance to perceptual and motor interference

Experimental Aging Research

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 179-197

  Jennings, J Richard ^a   Mendelson, David N ^a   Redfern, Mark S ^a   Nebes, Robert D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953023281     PISSN: 0361073X     EISSN: 10964657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2011.554512     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Andres,P.,Guerrini,C.,Phillips,L.H.,&Perfect,T. J. (2008).Differentialeffectsofaging on executive and automatic inhibition. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 101-123. (Pubitemid 351431295)
2. Borella, E., Carretti, B., & De Beni, R. (2008). Working memory and inhibition across the adult life-span. Acta Psychologica, 128, 33-44.
3. Bruyer, R. (2003). Are perceptual and motor inhibition processes really dissociated? A comment on Nassauer and Halperin (2003). Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 811-812.
4. Burke, D. M., & Osborne, G. (2007). Aging and inhibition deficits: Where are the effects? In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 163-183). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Christ, S. E., White, D. A., Mandernach, T., Keys, B. A., Christ, S. E., White, D. A., et al. (2001). Inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 653-669. (Pubitemid 34297340)
6. Colcombe, S. J., Kramer, A. F., Erickson, K. I., & Scalf, P. (2005). The implications of cortical recruitment and brain morphology for individual differences in inhibitory function in aging humans. Psychology and Aging, 20, 363-375. (Pubitemid 41572542)
7. Dempster, F. N., & Corkill, A. J. (1999). Interference and inhibition in cognition and behavior: Unifying themes for educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 1-88.
8. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101-135. (Pubitemid 38260136)
9. Furman, J. M., & Cass, S. P. (1996). Laboratory evaluation. I. Electronystagmography and rotational testing. In R. W. Baloh & M. Halmagyi (Eds.), Disorders of the vestibular system (pp. 191-210). New York: Oxford Press.
10. Germain, S., & Collette, F. (2008). Dissociation of perceptual and motor inhibitory processes in young and elderly participants using the Simon task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 1014-1021.
11. Grant, J. D., & Dagenbach, D. (2000). Further considerations regarding inhibitory processes, working memory, and cognitive aging. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 69-94.
12. Hasher, L., Lustig, C., & Zacks, R. (Eds.). (2007). Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Hasher, L.,&Zacks,R. (1988).Workingmemory, comprehension, and aging:A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 22, pp. 193-225). New York: Academic Press.
14. Kane,M. J.,Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E. R., Zacks,R. T.,&Connelly, S. (1994). Inhibitory attentional mechanisms and aging. Psychology and Aging, 9, 103-112. (Pubitemid 24281676)
15. Kastner, S. (2004). Atention response modulation in the human visual system. In M. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 144-156). New York: Guilford.
16. Koch, I., Prinz, W., & Allport, A. (2005). Involuntary retrieval in alphabetarithmetic tasks: Task-mixing and task-switching costs. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 69, 252-261. (Pubitemid 40405519)
17. Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., & Logan, G. D. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491-512.
18. Li, S. C., Lindenberger, U., Hommel, B., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W., Baltes, P. B., et al. (2004). Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent cognitive processes across the life span. Psychological Science, 15, 155-163. (Pubitemid 38361365)
19. Los, S. A. (1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials. Acta Psychologica, 94, 145-188. (Pubitemid 126372789)
20. Lustig, C., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. (2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a 'New view.' In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. McLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 145-162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. McAuley, T., Yap, M., Christ, S. E., White, D. A., McAuley, T., Yap, M., et al. (2006). Revisiting inhibitory control across the life span: Insights from the ex-Gaussian distribution. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 447-458. (Pubitemid 43830485)
22. McDowd, J. M. (1997). Inhibition in attention and aging. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52B, P265-P273. (Pubitemid 28006859)
23. Mendelson, D. N., Redfern, M. S., Nebes, R. D., & Jennings, J. R. (2010). Inhibitory processes relate differently to balance=reaction time dual tasks in young and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17(1), 1-18.
24. Nassauer, K. W., & Halperin, J. M. (2003). Dissociation of perceptual and motor inhibition processes through the use of novel computerized conflict tasks. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 25-30. (Pubitemid 36150135)
25. Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition=disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220-246.
26. Raz, N. (2005). The aging brain observed in vivo: Differential changes and their modifiers. In R. Cabez, L. Nyberg & D. Park (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of aging (pp. 19-57). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. Redfern, M. S., Jennings, J. R., Mendelson, D., & Nebes, R. D. (2009). Perceptual inhibition is associated with sensory integration in standing postural control among older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 64, 569-576.
28. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Sylvester, C.-Y. C. (2005). The cognitive neuroscience of working memory and aging. In R. Cabeza, L. Nyberg & D. Park (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of aging (pp. 186-217). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Salthouse, T. A. (2000). Aging and measures of processing speed. Biological Psychology, 54, 35-54.
30. Sternberg, S. (1969). Discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.
31. Troyer, A. K., Leach, L., & Strauss, E. (2006). Aging and response inhibition: Normative data for the Victoria Stroop Test. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13, 20-35.