Differentiating word learning processes may yield new insights - A commentary on Stoel-Gammon's Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children

Journal of Child Language

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 51-55

  Storkel, Holly L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LEARNING; MEMORY; NOTE; PHONETICS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SEMANTICS;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LEARNING; MEMORY; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 79953011880     PISSN: 03050009     EISSN: 14697602     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0305000910000486     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Carpenter, G. A. & Grossberg, S. (1987). A massively parallel architecture for a selforganizing neural pattern recognition machine. Computer, Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 37, 54-115. (Pubitemid 17518775)
2. Davis, M. H. & Gaskell, M. G. (2009). A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Science 364, 3773-800.
3. Dumay, N. & Gaskell, M. G. (2007). Sleep-associated changes in the mental representation of spoken words. Psychological Science 18, 35-39.
4. Edwards, J., Beckman, M. & Munson, B. (2004). The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 47, 421-36. (Pubitemid 38544560)
5. Gaskell, M. G. & Dumay, N. (2003). Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words. Cognition 89, 105-132. (Pubitemid 36952632)
6. Gathercole, S. E., Frankish, C. R., Pickering, S. J. & Peaker, S. (1999). Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25, 84-95.
7. Hoover, J. R., Storkel, H. L. & Hogan, T. P. (2010). A cross-sectional comparison of the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children. Journal of Memory and Language 63, 100-116.
8. Leach, L. & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: when adults learn new words. Cognitive Psychology 55, 306-353.
9. Li, P., Farkas, I. & MacWhinney, B. (2004). Early lexical development in a self-organizing neural network. Neural Networks 17, 1345-62. (Pubitemid 39539546)
10. Roodenrys, S. & Hinton, M. (2002). Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28, 29-33.
11. Storkel, H. L. & Hoover, J. R. (2010). An on-line calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density based on child corpora of spoken American English. Behavior Research Methods 42, 497-506.
12. Storkel, H. L. & Lee, S. Y. (in press). The independent effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on lexical acquisition by preschool children. Language and Cognitive Processes.
13. Storkel, H. L., Maekawa, J. & Hoover, J. R. (2010). Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: A comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53, 933-49.
14. Tamminen, J. & Gaskell, M. G. (2008). Newly learned spoken words show long-term lexical competition effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61, 361-71.
15. Thomson, J. M., Richardson, U. & Goswami, U. (2005). Phonological similarity neighborhoods and children's short-term memory: typical development and dyslexia. Memory & Cognition 33, 1210-19. (Pubitemid 46202375)
16. Thorn, A. S. & Frankish, C. R. (2005). Long-term knowledge effects on serial recall of nonwords are not exclusively lexical. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31, 729-35. (Pubitemid 41168518)