Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the neck disability index and numeric rating scales for neck and arm pain

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 490-494

  Carreon, Leah Y ^a   Anderson, Paul A ^b   McDonough, Christine M ^c,d   Djurasovic, Mladen ^a   Glassman, Steven D ^a  

^a NORTON LEATHERMAN SPINE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

cost utility analysis; Neck Disability Index; outcome measurement; SF 6D; utilities

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM PAIN; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; NECK PAIN; PAIN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SHORT FORM 6D; SPINE FUSION;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ARM; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; COHORT STUDIES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 79952993122     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d323f3     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bloom BS. Use of formal benefi t/cost evaluations in health system decision making. Am J Manag Care 2004;10:329-35. (Pubitemid 38623524)
2. Dickson M, Hurst J, Jacobzone S. Survey of Pharmacoeconomic Assessment Activity in Eleven Countries. Paria, France: Directorate for Employment, labor and Social Affairs, OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development; 2003.
3. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Programmes. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2004.
4. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russel LB, et al. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
5. Kaplan RM. Health-related quality of life in cardiovascular disease. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:382-92.
6. The EuroQol Group. EuroQola new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199-208.
7. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002;21:271-92. (Pubitemid 34143147)
8. Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, et al. Multiattribute and single attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Med Care 2002;40:113-28.
9. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SK. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summaries Scales: A User's Manual. Boston, MA: The Health Insti-tute; 1994.
10. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, et al. The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:271-3. (Pubitemid 11234479)
11. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:63-9. (Pubitemid 36070775)
12. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991;14:409-15.
13. Buxton MJ, Lacey LA, Feagan BG, et al. Mapping from disease-specifi c measures to utility:an analysis of the relationships between the infl ammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire and Crohn's Dis-ease Activity Index in Crohn's disease and measures of utility. Value Health 2007;10:214-20. (Pubitemid 46802279)
14. Brazier J, Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, et al. Estimating a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) instrument from the SF-6D. Value Health 2004;7:490-8. (Pubitemid 39038458)
15. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, McDonough CM, et al. Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the Oswestry disability index and nu-meric rating scales for back and leg pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:2085-9.
16. Erickson P. Evaluation of a population-based measure of quality of life: the Health and Activity Limitation Index (HALex). Qual Life Res 1998; 7:101-14. (Pubitemid 28097897)
17. Franks P, Lubetkin EI, Gold MR, et al. Mapping the SF-12 to pref-erence-based instruments. Med Care 2003;41:1277-83.
18. Fryback DG, Lawrence WF, Martin PA, et al. Predicting Quality of Well-being scores from the SF-36: results from the Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study. Med Decis Making 1997;17:1-9. (Pubitemid 27020134)
19. Gold M, Franks P, Erickson P. Assessing the health of the nation. The predictive validity of a preference-based measure and self-rated health. Med Care 1996;34:163-77.
20. Gold MR, Franks P, McCoy KI, et al. Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: using national measures to create condition-specifi c values [comment]. Med Care 1998;36:778-92. (Pubitemid 128454315)
21. Gray AM, Rivero-Arias O, Clarke PM. Estimating the association between SF-12 responses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping. Med Decis Making 2006;26:18-29. (Pubitemid 43134124)
22. Hollingworth W, Deyo RA, Sullivan SD, et al. The practicality and validity of directly elicited and SF-36 derived health state prefer-ences in patients with low back pain. Health Econ 2002;11:71-85. (Pubitemid 34097623)
23. Kind P, Macran S. Eliciting social preference weights for functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung health states. Pharmacoeconomics 2005;23: 1143-53. (Pubitemid 41633403)
24. Lawrence WF, Fleishman JA. Predicting EuroQoL EQ-5D prefer-ence scores from the SF-12 Health Survey in a nationally represen-tative sample. Med Decis Making 2004;24:160-9. (Pubitemid 38391936)
25. Lee TA, Hollingworth W, Sullivan SD. Comparison of directly elicited preferences to preferences derived from the SF-36 in adults with asthma. Med Decis Making 2003;23:323-34. (Pubitemid 36899098)
26. Lenert LA, Sherbourne CD, Sugar C, et al. Estimation of utilities for the effects of depression from the SF-12. Med Care 2000;38:763-70.
27. Lenert LA, Sturley AP, Rapaport MH, et al. Public preferences for health states with schizophrenia and a mapping function to esti-mate utilities from positive and negative symptom scale scores. Schizophr Res 2004;71:155-65. (Pubitemid 39209485)
28. Longworth L, Buxton M, Sculpher M, et al. Estimating utility data from clinical indicators for patients with stable angina. Eur J Health Econ 2005; 6:347-53. (Pubitemid 41779933)
29. Lundberg I, Johannesson M, Isacson D, et al. The relationship be-tween health state utilities and the SF-12 in a general population. Med Decis Making 1999;12:128-40. (Pubitemid 29318142)
30. Sanderson K, Andrews G, Corry J, et al. Using the effect size to model change in preference values from descriptive health status. Qual Life Res 2004;13: 1255-64. (Pubitemid 39149609)
31. Sengupta N, Nichol MB, Wu J, et al. Mapping the SF-12 to the HUI3 and VAS in a managed care population. Med Care 2004;42:927-37. (Pubitemid 39456925)
32. Sherbourne C, Unutzer J, Schoenbaum M, et al. Can utility-weighted health-related quality-of-life estimates capture health effects of quality improvement for depression? Med Care 2001;39:1246-59.
33. Shmueli A. Subjective health status and health values in the general population. Med Decis Making 1999;19:122-7. (Pubitemid 29318141)
34. Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan V Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally represen-tative sample. Med Decis Making 2006;26:401-9. (Pubitemid 44050844)
35. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. Correlates of improvement in multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994;62:172-9. (Pubitemid 24058710)
36. Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1115-28. (Pubitemid 28527167)
37. Mortimer D, Segal L. Comparing the incomparable? A systematic re-view of competing techniques for converting descriptive measures of health status into QALY weights. Med Decis Making 2008;28:66-89.
38. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care 2004;42:851-9. (Pubitemid 39456916)