Estimation of utilities for the effects of depression from the SF-12

Medical Care

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 763-768

  Lenert, Leslie A ^a,e   Sherbourne, Cathy D ^b   Sugar, Catherine ^c   Wells, Kenneth B ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e Hlth Serv Research and Development   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness analysis; Depression; Health index; Health status; Utility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPRESSION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DEPRESSION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MODELS, STATISTICAL; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 0034218368     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200007000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Gold M, Patrick D, Torrance G, Fryback DG, Haddorn DC, Kamlet MS, et al. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York, NY: Oxford Press 1996:101-102.
2. Ware JJ, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220-233.
3. Fryback DG, Dasbach EJ, Klein R, Klein BE, Dom N, Peterson K, et al. The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: Initial catalog of health-state quality factors. Med Decis Making 1993;13:89-102.
4. Wells KB, Sherbourne CD. Functioning and utility for current health of patients with depression or chronic medical conditions in managed, primary care practices. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;56:897-904.
5. Revicki DA, Wood M. Patient-assigned health state utilities for depression related outcomes: Differences by depression severity and antidepressant medication. J Affect Disord 1998;48:25-36.
6. Pyne JM, Patterson TL, Kaplan RM, Ho S, Gillin JC, Golsham S, et al. Preliminary longitudinal assessment of quality of life in patients with major depression. Psychopharmacol Bull 1997;33:23-29.
7. Sugar CA, Sturm R, Lee TT, Sherbourne CD, Olshen RA, Wells KB, et al. Empirically defined health states for depression from the SF-12. Health Serv Res 1998;33:911-928.
8. Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51;115-1128.
9. Lenert LA, Treadwell JR, Schwartz CE. Associations between health status and utilities implications for policy. Med Care 1999;37:479-489.
10. Wells KB, Burnam MA, Rogers W, Hays R, Camp P. The course of depression in adult outpatients: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:788-794.
11. Rogers W, McGlynn EA, Berry SH, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M, et al. Methods of sampling. In: Stewart AL, Ware JE Jr, eds. Measuring functioning and well being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1992:24-27.
12. Wells KB. The design of Partners in Care: evaluating the cost-effectiveness of improving care for depression in primary care. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999;34:20-29.
13. Lenert LA, Treadwell J. Effect of failure to maintain procedural invariance on utility elicitations. Med Decis Making 1999;19:473-481.
14. Hornberger J, Lenert LA. Variation among quality-of-life surveys: theory and practice. Med Care 1996;34:DS23-DS33.
15. Simon GE, Revicki DA, Grothaus L, Vonkorff M. SF-36 summary scores: Are physical and mental health truly distinct? Med Care 1998;36:567-572.