Using contexts to supervise a collaborative process

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 25-40

  Gonzalez, Avelino J ^a   Tsuruta, Setsuo ^b   Sakurai, Yoshitaka ^b   Nguyen, Johann ^a   Takada, Kouhei ^b   Uchida, Ken ^b  

^a University of Central Florida   (United States)

^b TOKYO DENKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computer Supported Cooperative Work; Context Based Reasoning; Project Management

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; COLLABORATIVE PROCESS; COLLABORATIVE TOOLS; COLLABORATIVE WORK; COMPLEX PROJECTS; CONTEXT-BASED REASONING; CONTEXTUAL GRAPH; CONTEXTUAL REASONING; COST OVERRUNS; KNOWLEDGE WORKERS; NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATIONS; PROJECT MANAGERS; PROJECT OBJECTIVES; PUBLIC DOMAINS; ROCKET DESIGN; SITUATIONAL AWARENESS;

DESIGN; GROUPWARE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MANAGERS; NASA; ROCKETS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79952992786     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: 14691760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060410000156     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abernethy, K., Piegari, G., & Reichgelt, H. (2007). Teaching project management: An experiential approach. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 22(3), 198-205.
2. Bannerman, P.L. (2007). Software project risk in the public sector. Proc. 2007 Australian Software Engineering Conf.
3. Bardram, J.E. (1996). Organisational prototyping: Adopting CSCW applications in organisations. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 8(1), 69-88.
4. Barrett, G.C., & Gonzalez, A.J. (2002). Modeling collaborative behaviors in context-based reasoning. Proc. 2002 Swedish American Workshop on Modeling and Simulation, Orlando, FL, October 29-30, 2002
5. Borges, M.R.S., Brézillon, P., Pino, J.A.,& Pomerol, J.-Ch. (2004). Bringing context to CSCW. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, pp. 161-166. (Pubitemid 40402570)
6. Brewer, J.L. (2005). Project managers, can we make them or just make them better? Proc. SIGITE'05, pp. 167-173.
7. Brézillon, P. (2002). Modeling and using context: Past, present and future. Accessed at http://www.lip6.fr/reports/lip6.2002.010.pdf
8. Brézillon, P. (2005). Task-realization models in contextual graphs. Proc. Context 2005 Conf., pp. 55-68.
9. Brown, J. (1994). Application and evaluation of the context-based reasoning paradigm. Master's Thesis. University of Central Florida, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
10. Clancey,W.J. (1997). Situated Cognition-On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Dominguez, C. (1994). Can SA be defined? In Situation Awareness: Papers and Annotated Bibliography (Vidulich, M., Dominguez, C., Vogel, E. & McMillan, G., Eds.), pp. 5-15, Report AL/CF-TR-1994-0085. Columbus, OH: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.
12. Endsley, M. (1988). Design and evaluation of situation awareness enhancement. Proc. Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, pp. 97-101.
13. Endsley, M.R. (2000). Theoretical underpinnings of situational awareness: A critical review. In Situation Awareness and Measurements (Endsley, M.R., & Garland, D.J., Eds.). New York: Erlbaum.
14. Engelmore, R.S., & Morgan, A. (Eds.). (1988). Blackboard Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Fan, X., Sun, S.,& Yen, J. (2005). On shared situation awareness for supporting human decision-making teams. Proc. 2005 AAAI Spring Symp. AI Technologies and Homeland Security.
16. Feng, Y., Teng, T., & Tan, A. (2009). Modeling situational awareness for context- aware decision support. Expert SystemsWith Applications 36, 455-463.
17. Fernlund, H. (2004). Evolving models from observed human performance. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Central Florida.
18. Fox, T.L., & Spence, J.W. (2005). The effect of decision style on the use of a project management tool: An empirical laboratory study. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 36(2), 28-42.
19. Gaba, D.M., Howard, S.K., & Small, S.D. (1995). Situation awareness in anesthesiology. Human Factors 37(1), 20-32.
20. Gero, J.S. (2004).Constructive memory for situated design agents. Artificial Intelligence for EngineeringDesign, Analysis and Manufacturing 18(2), 163-198. (Pubitemid 40539678)
21. Gonzalez, A.J. (2007). Using Contexts to Control a Collaborative Process. Final Report. Tokyo Denki University. Accessed at http://isl.ucf.edu
22. Gonzalez, A.J., & Ahlers, R. (1998). Context-based representation of intelligent behavior in training simulations. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation 15(4), 153-166. (Pubitemid 128740323)
23. Gonzalez, A.J., & Brézillon, P. (2008). Integrating two context-based formalisms for improved representation of human tactical behavior. Knowledge Engineering Review 23(3), 295-315.
24. Gonzalez, A.J., Castro, J., & Gerber, W.E. (2006). Automating the acquisition of tactical knowledge for military missions. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation 3(1), 145-160.
25. Gonzalez, A.J., Stensrud, B.S., & Barrett, G. (2008). Formalizing contextbased reasoning-a modeling paradigm for representing tactical human behavior. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 23(7), 822-847.
26. Gonzalez, F.G., Grejs, P.,& Gonzalez, A. J. (2000). Autonomous automobile behavior through context-based reasoning. Proc. Int. FLAIRS Conf.
27. Gumus, I. (1999). A threat prioritization algorithm formultiple intelligent entities in a simulated environment. Master's Thesis. University of Central Florida.
28. Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2004). The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors That Drive Process and Performance (Salas, E., & Fiore, S.M., Eds.), pp. 177-201. Washington DC: APA Press.
29. Harwood, K., Barnett, B., & Wickens, C. (1988). Situational awareness; a conceptual andmethodological framework. Proc. 11th Symp. Psychology in the DoD (McIntire, F.E., Ed.). Colorado Springs, CO: US Air Force Academy.
30. Henninger, A.E., & Gonzalez, A.J. (1997). Automated acquisition tool for tactical knowledge. Proc. 10th Annual Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symp., pp. 307-311.
31. Kokinov, B., Petkov, G. & Petrova, N. (2007). Context-sensitivity of human memory: Episode connectivity and its influence on memory reconstruction. Proc. Context 2007 Conf., pp. 317-329. (Pubitemid 350271220)
32. Lee, C.-S., Wang, M.-H., Chen, J.-J., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2006). Ontology-based intelligent decision support agent for CMMI project monitoring and control. Proc. North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS), pp. 627-632.
33. Lee, S., & Peña-Mora, F. (2005). System dynamics approach for error and change management in concurrent design and construction. Proc. 2005 Winter Simulation Conf.
34. Levitt, R.E., & Nissen, M.E. (2003). The Virtual Design Team (VDT): A multi-agent analysis framework for designing project organizations. Proc. 2003 KIMAS Conf., pp. 115-120.
35. Medina-Mora, R.,Winograd,T., Flores,R.,& Flores, F. (1992).The action workflow approach to workflow management technology. Proc. CSCW 1992.
36. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2003). RocketModeler, version 1.2. Accessed at http://www.nasa.gov/
37. Nehme, C.E., Crandall, J., & Cummings, M.L. (2008). Using discrete event simulation to model situational awareness of unmanned vehicle operators. VMASC Capstone Conf.
38. Nienaber, R., & Cloete, E. (2003). A software agent framework for the support of software project management. Proc. SAICSIT 2003, pp. 16-23.
39. Norlander, L. (1998). A framework for efficient implementation of contextbased reasoning in intelligent simulations. Master's Thesis. University of Central Florida.
40. Proenza, R. (1997). A framework for multiple agents and memory recall within the Context-Based Reasoning Paradigm. Master's Thesis. University of Central Florida.
41. Sapateiro, C., & Antunes, P. (2009). An emergency response model towards situational awareness improvement. Proc. 6th Int. ISCRAM Conf.
42. Smith, J.L., Bohner, S.A., & McCrickard, D.S. (2005). Project management for the 21st century: Supporting collaborative design through risk analysis. Proc. 43rd ACM Southeast Conf.
43. Stiffler, D. (1988). Graduate level situation awareness. USAF Fighter Weapons Review.
44. Stensrud, B.S. (2005). FAMTILE: An algorithm for learning high-level tactical behavior from observation. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Central Florida.
45. Turner, R.M. (1998). Context-mediated behavior for intelligent agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 48(3), 307-330. (Pubitemid 128379459)
46. Wu, S., & Kotak, D. (2003). Agent-based collaborative project management system for distributed manufacturing. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 2, pp. 1223-1228.