Person-in-the-loop testing of a digital power plant control room

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 289-293

  Roth, Emilie M ^a   Easter, James ^b   Hall, Robert E ^c   Kabana, Leonard ^d   Mashio, Kenji ^d   Hanada, Satoshi ^e   Clouser, Timothy ^f   Remley, Gilbert W ^g  

^a Roth Cognitive Engineering   (United States)

^b Preferred Licensing Services   (United States)

^c REH Technology Solutions   (United States)

^d Mitsubishi Nuclear Energy Systems   (United States)

^e MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD   (Japan)

^f Luminant Power   (United States)

^g Mitsubishi Electric Power Products Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL BOARDS; CONTROL ROOMS; CREW SIZE; DIGITAL CONTROL; DIGITAL POWER PLANT; IN-BUILDINGS; PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR PLANT; SIMULATOR TEST; TEST PROGRAM; WORK-LOAD DISTRIBUTION;

ALARM SYSTEMS; DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; DISPLAY DEVICES; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS; STRUCTURED PROGRAMMING;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 79952910975     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118110X12829369201197     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. nd Annual Meeting, (pp. 763-767). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
2. Burns, C., Skraaning, G., Jamierson, G., Lau, N., Kwok, J., Welch, R., and Andresen, G., (2008), Evaluation of Ecological Interface Design for Nuclear Process Control: Situation Awareness Effects, Human Factors, 50, 663-679.
3. Fink, R. T., Killian, C. D., Hanes, L. F. and Naser, J. A. (2009). Guidelines for the design and implementation of computerized procedures. Nuclear News, March Issue, 85-90.
4. O'Hara, J. M., Higgins J. C., Persensky, J. J., Lewis, P. M., & Bongarra, J. P. (2004). Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model, NUREG-0711, Rev. 2. Washington, DC: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
5. O'Hara, J. M. and Roth, E. M. (2005). Operational concepts, teamwork, and technology in commercial nuclear power stations. In Clint Bowers, Eduardo Salas and Florian Jentsch (Eds) Creating High-Tech Teams: Practical guidance on work performance and technology, (pp. 139-159).Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
6. Roth, E.M., and O'Hara, J., (2002), Integrating Digital and Conventional Human System Interfaces: Lessons Learned from a Control Room Modernization Program, Washington, DC, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, (NUREG/CR-6749 also BNL-NUREG-52638).
7. Sebok, A. (2000). Team performance in process control: Influences of interface design and staffing levels. Ergonomics, 41, 1210-1236.
8. Vicente, K.J., Roth, E.M., Mumaw, R.J. (2001), How do operators monitor a complex, dynamic work domain? The impact of control room technology, International Journal of Human Compuler Studies, 54, 831-856.
9. US-APWR Human System Interface Verification and Validation, MUAP-08014-P, December 2008, MHI
10. US-APWR Human System Interface Design, MUAP-09019-P, June 2009, MHI