Team performance in process control: Influences of interface design and staffing levels

Ergonomics

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 1210-1236

  Sebok, Angelia ^a  

^a OECD HALDEN REACTOR PROJECT   (Norway)

Author keywords

Human machine interface; Situation awareness; Staffing levels; Team performance; Workload

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; ERGONOMICS; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; HUMAN RELATION; JOB PERFORMANCE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; PROCESS CONTROL; STAFF; TEAMWORK; WORKLOAD;

EID: 0033841701     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130050084950     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ABB Atom Preliminary Safety Information Document 1989, PIUS: The PIUS Arrangement Principle for a Simplified Passive Advanced Light Water Reactor Plant (Vasteras, Sweden: ABB Atom).
2. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd, CANDU Operations 1989, The Candu 3 Technical Description. Technical report 74-01371-TED-001, Revd 3, 15 September.
3. BAKER, D. P. and SALAS, E. 1992, Principles for measuring teamwork skills, Human Factors, 34, 469-475.
4. BERGSTROM, B. 1993, Task Demand, Workload, and Performance. FOA Report A 50016-5. 2 (National Defense Research Establishment Department for Human Studies) (Umea, Sweden: Forsvarets Forskningsanstalt (FOA)).
5. BRANNICK, M. T., PRINCE, A., PRINCE, C. and SALAS, E. 1995, The measurement of team process, Human Factors, 37, 641-651.
6. COOK, T. D. and CAMPBELL, D. T. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (London: Houghton Mifflin).
7. COURY, B. G. and TERRANOVA, M. 1991, Collaborative decision making in dynamic systems, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 31st Annual Meeting, 944-948.
8. DECURNEX, C., MOUM, B. R. and FORDESTROMMEN, N. T. 1996, Integrated Information Overview Displays. Internal Halden Work Report of the OECD Halden Reactor Project, HWR-451 (Halden, Norway: OECD Halden Reactor Project).
9. ENDSLEY, M. R. 1987, The application of human factors to the development of expert systems for advanced cockpits, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 31st Annual Meeting, 1388-1392.
10. ENDSLEY, M. R. 1988a, Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, 97-101.
11. ENDSLEY, M. R. 1988b, Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT), in Proceedings of the IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, NAECON (Dayton, Ohio), 789-795.
12. ENDSLEY, M. R. 1990, Predictive utility of an objective measure of situation awareness, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, 41-45.
13. ENDSLEY, M. R. 1995a, Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems, Human Factors, 37, 32-64.
14. ENDSLEY, M. R. 1995b, Measure of situation awareness in dynamic systems, Human Factors, 37, 65-84.
15. FOUSHEE, H. C. 1984, Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: factors affecting group process and aircrew performance, American Psychologist, 39, 885-893.
16. FOUSHEE, H. C. and HELMREICH, R. L. 1988, Group Interaction and Flight Crew Performance, in E. Wiener and D. Nagel (eds), Human Factors in Aviation (New York: Academic Press).
17. FORDESTROMMEN, N. T. and KVALEM, J. 1996, Halden Man-Machine Laboratory as of 1996. Internal Halden Work Report of the OECD Halden Reactor Project, HWR-476 (Halden, Norway: OECD Halden Reactor Project).
18. GE Nuclear Energy 1992, SBWR Standard Safety Analysis Report. Report 25A5113 Revd A.
19. GLICKMAN, A. S., ZIMMER, S., MONTERO, R. C., GUERETTE, P. J., CAMPBELL, W. J., MORGAN, B. B. Jr and SALAS, E. 1987, The Evolution of Teamwork Skills: An Empirical Assessment with Implications for Training. Technical report 87-016 (Orlando: Office of Naval Research and Human Factors Division, Naval Training Systems Center).
20. HALLBERT, B. P., SEBOK, A. L., HAUGSET, K., MORISSEAU, D. S. and PERSENSKY, J. J. 1995, Interim Results of the Study of Control Room Crew Staffing for Advanced Passive Reactor Plants, in Proceedings of the 23rd Water Reactor Safety Meeting (Bethesda).
21. HANSON, D. J., MEYER, O. R., BLACKMAN, H. S., NELSON, W. R. and HALLBERT, B. P. 1987, Evaluation of Operation Safety at Babcock and Wilcox Plants, vol. 1: Results Overview, NUREG/CR-4966 (Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission).
22. HILL, S. G., IAVECCHIA, H. P., BYERS, J. C., BITTNER, A. C., ZAKLAD, A. L. and CHRIST, R. E. 1992, Comparison of four subjective workload rating scales, Human Factors, 34, 429-439.
23. HOGG, D. N., FOLLESO, K., TORRALBA, B. and VOLDEN, F. S. 1995, Development of a situation awareness measure to evaluate advanced alarm systems in nuclear power plant control rooms, Ergonomics, 38, 2394-2413.
24. HOOPER, K. N., COURY, B. G. and TERRANOVA, M. 1991, Team performance in dynamic systems, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (San Francisco).
25. HUEY, B. M. and WICKENS, C. D. (eds) 1993, Workload Transition: Implications for Individual and Team Performance (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
26. IDASZAK, J. R. 1989, Human operators in automated systems: the impact of active participation and communication, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting, 778-782.
27. KOMAKI, J. L., DESSELLES, M. L. and BOWMAN, E. D. 1989, Definitely not a breeze: Extending an operant model of effective supervision to teams, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 522-529.
28. MONTGOMERY, J., GADDY, C. and TOQUAM, J. 1991, Team interaction skills evaluation criteria for nuclear power plan control room operators, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, 918-922.
29. MONTGOMERY, J. C. and HAUTH, J. T. 1992, Team interaction skills evaluation criteria for nuclear power plant control room operators, in Proceedings of the US Nuclear Regulator Commission Eighteenth Water Reactor Safety Information Meeting (Bethesda).
30. MORGAN, B. B. Jr, GLICKMAN, A. S., WOODARD, E. A., SALAS, E. and BLAIWES, A. 1986, Measurement of Team Behaviors in a Navy Training Environment. Technical report 86014 (Orlando: Office of Naval Research and Human Factors Division, Naval Training Systems Center).
31. MOSIER, K. L. and CHIDESTER, T. R. 1991, Situation assessment and situation awareness in a team setting, in Y. Queinnec and F. Daniellou (eds), Designing for Everyone (London: Taylor & Francis), 798-800.
32. O’HARA, J. M. and HALL, R. E. 1992, Advanced control rooms and crew performance issues: Implications for human reliability, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 39, 919-923.
33. PARASURAMAN, R., MOLLOY, R. and SINGH, I. L. 1993, Performance consequences of automation-induced ‘complacency, International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.
34. REGAL, D. M., ROGERS, W. H. and BOUCEK, G. P. Jr 1988, Situational awareness in the commercial flight deck: Definition, measurement, and enhancement, SAE Technical Paper Series: Aerospace Technological Conference and Exposition (Anaheim, California), 15.
35. ROTH, E. M., LIN, L., THOMAS, V. M., KERCH, S., KENNEY, S. J. and SUGIBAYASHI, N. 1998, Supporting situation awareness of individuals and teams using group view displays, in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 244-248.
36. ROTH, E. M., MUMAW, R. J. and LEWIS, P. M. 1994, An Empirical Investigation of Operator Performance in Cognitively Demanding Simulated Emergencies. NUREG/CR-6208 (Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission).
37. ROTH, E. M., MUMAW, R. J. and STUBLER, W. F. 1993, Human factors evaluation issues for advanced control rooms: a research agenda, IEEE Conference Proceedings, 254-265.
38. SCHRYVER, J. C. 1994, Experimental validation of navigation workload metrics, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 38th Annual Meeting, 341-344.
39. SEBOK, A. L., HALLBERT, B. P. and MORISSEAU, D. S. 1996, Crew performance issues in nuclear power plant process disturbances, in Proceedings of the 1996 American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (State College, PA), 645-651.
40. STUBLER, W. F. and O’HARA, J. M. 1996, Group-View Displays: Functional Characteristics and Review Criteria. Technical report E2090-T-4-4-12/94 (Upton: Brookhaven National Laboratory).
41. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 1992, AP600 Standard Safety Analysis Report, revd 0, Simplified Passive Advanced Light Water Reactor Plant Program Report DE-AC03-90SF18495. Prepared for the US Department of Energy, San Francisco Operations Office.
42. WINER, B. J. 1971, Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd edn (New York: McGraw-Hill).
43. WOODS, D. D. 1984, Visual momentum: a concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21, 229-244.