A comparative, long term assessment of soft tissue substitutes: AlloDerm, Enduragen, and Dermamatrix

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 849-850

  Gordley, Kyle ^a   Cole, Patrick ^a   Hicks, John ^a   Hollier, Larry ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN; EOSIN; HEMATOXYLIN;

CADAVER DONOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE GRAFT; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; HISTOLOGY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFLAMMATORY INFILTRATE; LETTER; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PLASTIC SURGERY; PLIABILITY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN GRAFT; SOFT TISSUE; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; TISSUE SECTION; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COLLAGEN; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 67349279410     PISSN: 17486815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.05.006     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Sclafani A.P., Romo T., and Jacono A.A. Evaluation of acellular dermal graft (AlloDerm) sheet for soft tissue augmentation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3 (2001) 101
2. Gurney T.A., and Kim D.W. Applications of porcine dermal collagen (Enduragen) in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 15 (2007 Feb) 113-121
3. Vural E., McLaughlin N., Hogue W.R., et al. Comparison of biomechanical properties of alloderm and enduragen as static facial sling biomaterials. Laryngoscope 116 (2006 Mar) 394-396