Compounds in Turkish

Lingue e Linguaggio

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 213-235

  Göksel, Asli ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Compound; Linking element; Turkish

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952894544     PISSN: 17209331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1418/30928     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson, G.D.S. (2005). Language contact in South Central Siberia. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
2. Arslan-Kechriotis (2006). Case as an uninterpretable feature. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Boǧaziçi University.
3. Bassac, C. & Bouillon P. (2001). The telic relation in compounds in French and Turkish. In K. Kanzaki & P. Bouillon (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon (GL01). Geneva (available at: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/29104/ftp:zSzzSzissco-ftp.unige.chzSzpubzSzpublicationszSzsummary42.pdf/the-telicrelationship-in.pdf).
4. Bauer, L. (2008). Dvandva. Word Structure 2 (1), 1-18.
5. Bisetto, A. & Scalise S. (1999). Compounding: morphology and/or syntax. In L. Mereu (Ed.), Boundaries of morphology and syntax (pp. 31-48), Amsterdam, Benjamins.
6. Bisetto, A. & Scalise, S. (2005). The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio, IV (2), 319-332.
7. Braun, F. & Haig, G. (2000). The noun/adjective distinction in Turkish: an empirical approach. In A. Göksel & C. Kerslake (Eds.), Studies on Turkish and Turkic languages (pp. 85-92). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
8. Charette, M. (2008). The vital role of the trochaic foot in explaining Turkish word endings. Lingua 118 (1), 46-65.
9. Clark, L. (1998). Chuvash. In L. Johanson & É.Á. Csató (Eds.), The Turkic languages (pp. 434-452). London: Routledge.
10. Culicover, P. & Jackendoff R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Di Sciullo, A.M. (2005). Asymmetry in morphology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Dede, M. (1978). A syntactic and semantic analysis of Turkish nominal compounds, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
13. Erdal, M. (2004). A grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill.
14. Gökdayi, H. (2007). Takisiz Ad Tamlamalari. In L. Karoly (Ed.), Turcology in Turkey. Selected papers (Papers selected by N. Demir and E. Yilmaz) (pp. 243-252). Studia Uralo-Altaica 47. Szeged : SzTE BTK Altajisztikai Tanszék.
15. Göksel, A. (1988). Bracketing paradoxes in Turkish nominal compounds. In S. Koç (Ed.) Studies on Turkish linguistics (pp. 287-298). Ankara: METU Press.
16. Göksel, A. (2008). Linkers on the edge. Talk given at the CompoNet Congress on Compounding, Bologna, June 6-7, 2008.
17. Göksel, A. & Haznedar B. (2007). Remarks on Turkish compounds. Ms.
18. Göksel, A. & Kerslake C. (2005). Turkish. A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
19. Güneş, G. (2009). On the structure of VV compounds in Turkish. In Proceedings of the Postgraduate Conference on Linguistics. Mersin University.
20. Hayasi, T. (1996). The dual status of possessive compounds in Modern Turkish. In A. Berta, B. Brendemoen & C. Schönig (Eds.), Symbolae turcologicae. Studies in honor of Lars Johanson on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday (pp. 119-129), Vol. 6, İstanbul, Swedish Research Institute in İstanbul, Transactions.
21. Kabak, B. & Vogel, I. (2001). The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology 18, 315-360.
22. Kornfilt, J. (1984). The stuttering prohibition and morpheme deletion in Turkish. in E. Erguvanli-Taylan & A. Aksu-Koç (Eds.), Proceedings of the Turkish Linguistics Conference (pp. 295-307), Istanbul, Boǧaziçi University Publications.
23. Krott, A. (2001). Analogy in morphology. The selection of linking elements in Dutch compounds. Wageningen: Ponsen & Looijen.
24. Köster, D., Gunter, T.C., Wagner, S. & Friederici, A.D. (2004). Morphosyntax, prosody and linking elements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 (9), 1647-1668.
25. Krueger, J. (1977). Tuvan manual (Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series Vol. 126). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26. Lees, R. (1961). The phonology of modern standard Turkish. (Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series, Vol. 6). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
27. Lewis, G.L. ([1967] 2001). Turkish grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Özsoy, S. (2004). Dişişleri eski bakani ve Türkçe'nin yeni yapisi. In Z. Toksa (Ed.), Kaf Daǧi'nin ötesine varmak, Günay Kut Armaǧani, Vol. 3. (=Journal of Turkish Studies: Türklük Bilgisi Araştirmalari 28 (1)) (pp. 247-256). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
29. th International Morphology Meeting, Wien.
30. Ralli, A. (2008). Compound markers and parametric variation. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61 (1), 19-38.
31. Spencer, A. (1991). Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Schaaik, G. van (2002). The noun in Turkish: its argument structure and the compounding straitjacket. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
33. Schroeder, C. (1999). The Turkish nominal phrase in spoken discourse. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
34. Stachowski, M. & Menz A. (1998). Yakut. In L. Johanson & É.Á. Csató (Eds.), The Turkic languages (pp. 417-433). London: Routledge.
35. Uygun, D. (2009). Lexical categories in Turkish. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Boǧaziçi University.
36. Wälchli, B. (2005). Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Yükseker, H. (1987). Turkish nominal compounds. In P. Avery and H. Yükseker (Eds.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 7 (pp. 83-103). Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.
38. Yükseker, H. (1998). Possessive constructions in Turkish. In L. Johanson, É.Á. Csató, V. Locke, A. Menz & D. Winterling (Eds.), The Mainz meeting, Proceedings of the 11th International Meeting on Turkish Linguistics (pp. 458-477). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.