Information use in conceptual design: Existing taxonomies and new approaches

International Journal of Design

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 53-65

  Wodehouse, Andrew J ^a   Ion, William J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collaborative design; Conceptual design; Design information; Design methods; Digital libraries

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952892723     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16(1), 3-9.
2. Benami, O., & Jin, Y. (2002). Creative stimulation in conceptual design. Paper presented at the ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Confereces and Computer and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Canada.
3. Broens, R. C. J. A. M., & de Vries, M. J. (2003). Classifying technological knowledge for presentation to mechanical engineering designers. Design Studies, 24(5), 457-471.
4. Chuang, Y., & Chen, L. L. (2008). How to rate 100 visual stimuli efficiently. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 31-43.
5. Court, A. W., Culley, S. J., & McMahon, C. A. (1996). Information access diagrams: A technique for analyzing the usage of design information. Journal of Engineering Design, 7(1), 55-75.
6. Cross, N. (1994). Engineering design methods, strategies for product design. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427-441.
8. de Vries, M. J. (2005). Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
9. Dorst, K. (2003). The problem of design problems. In N. Cross & E. Edmonds (Eds.), Expertise in design (pp. 135-147). Sydney: Creativity and Cognition Studio Press.
10. Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.
11. Eliot, T. S. (1965). Selected poems. London: Faber and Faber.
12. Gero, J. S., & McNeill, T. (1998). An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies, 19(1), 21-61.
13. Gibson, C. B., & Cohen, S. G. (2003). Virtual teams that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123-143.
15. Hellfritz, H. (1978). Innovation via galeriemethode [Innovation via the art gallery method]. Koenistein im Taunus, Germany: Eigenverlag.
16. Hicks, B. J., Culley, S. J., Allen, R. D., & Mullineux, G. (2002). A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design. International Journal of Information Management, 22(4), 263-280.
17. Horváth, I., Kuczogi, G. Y., & Vergeest, J. S. (1998). Development and application of design concept, ontologies for contextual conceptualization. Paper presented at the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, New York, NY.
18. Howard, T. (2008). Information management for creative stimuli in engineering design. Bath, UK: University of Bath.
19. Hubka, V., & Eder, W. E. (1988). Theory of technical systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
20. Hummels, C., & Frens, J. (2008, September 4). Designing for the unknown: A design process for the future generation of highly interactive systems and products. Paper presented at the Engineering and Product Design Education, Barcelona, Spain.
21. th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Extended abstracts, pp. 2655-2658). New Yrok: ACM.
22. Kappel, T. A., & Rubenstein, A. H. (1999). Creativity in design: The contribution of information technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46(2), 132-143.
23. Kelley, T., & Littman, J. (2001). The art of innovation. London: Profile Books.
24. Kulkarni, S., Summers, J. D., Vargas-Hernandez, N., & Shah, J. J. (2001). Collaborative sketching (c-sketch) An idea generation technique for engineering design. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(3), 168-198.
25. Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Collaboration patterns in computer supported collaborative designing. Design Studies, 25(4), 351-371.
26. Liu, T., & Xu, X. W. (2001). A review of web-based product data management systems. Computers in Industry, 44(3), 251-262.
27. Malone, T. W. (1983). How do people organize their desks? Implications for the design of office information systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1(1), 99-112.
28. Mander, R., Salomon, G., & Wong, Y. Y. (1992). A "pile" metaphor for supporting casual organization of information. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 627-634). New York: ACM.
29. Mckoy, F. L., Vargas-Hernández, N., Summers, J. D. & Shah, J. J. (2001). Influence of design representation on effectiveness of idea generation. Paper presented at the ASME 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
30. Muller, W., & Pasman, G. (1996). Typology and the organization of design knowledge. Design Studies, 17(2), 111-130.
31. Osborn, A. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
32. Restrepo, J., & Christiaans, H. (2004). Problem structuring and information access in design. Journal of Design Research, 4(2). 1551-1569.
33. Rohrbach, B. (1969). Kreativ nach regeln. Absatzwirtschaft, 12, 73-75.
34. Ropohl, G. (1997). Knowledge types in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1/2), 65-72.
35. Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163-180.
36. Schutze, M., Sachse, P., & Romer, A. (2003). Support value of sketching in the design process. Research in Engineering Design, 14(2), 89-97.
37. Shah, J. J., Kulkarni, S. V., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4), 377-385.
38. Shah, J. J., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111-134.
39. Shedroff, N. (1999). Information interaction design: An unified field theory of design. In R. Jacobsen (Ed.), Information design (pp. 267-292). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Sim, S. K., & Duffy, A. H. B. (2003). Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities. Research in Engineering Design, 14(4), 200-223.
41. Smith, S. M., Kohn, N. W., & Shah, J. (2008, October 3). What you see is what you get: effects of provocative stimuli in creative invention. Paper presented at the NSF International Workshop on Studying Design Creativity, Provence, France.
42. Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 685-718.
43. Tergan, S.-O. (2005). Digital concept maps for managing knowledge and information. In S.-O. Tergan & T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge and information visualization (pp. 185-204). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
44. Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (1995). Product design and development (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore, MA: John Hopkins.
46. Wodehouse, A. J., & Ion, W. J. (2010). Digital information support for concept design. CoDesign, 6(1), 3-23.
47. Wodehouse, A. J., & Ion, W. J. (2010). The integration of information and ideas: Creating linkages through a novel concept design method. Parsons Journal for Information Mapping, 2(2). Retrieved August, 2010, from http://piim.newschool.edu/journal/issues/2010/02/
48. Zins, C. (2007). Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(4), 479-493.