What lies beyond same-sex marriage? Marriage, reproductive freedom and future persons in liberal public justification

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 39-58

  March, Andrew F ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952883709     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00471.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Maura I. Strassberg, ‘Distinctions of form or substance: Monogamy, polygamy and same-sex marriage’, North Carolina Law Review 75 (1997): 1501–1624
2. James M. Donovan, ‘Rock-salting the slippery slope: Why same-sex marriage is not a commitment to polygamous marriage’, Northern Kentucky Law Review 29,3 (2002): 521–590
3. Ruth K. Khalsa, ‘Polygamy as a red herring in the same-sex marriage debate’, Duke Law Journal 54 (2004–2005): 1665–1693.
4. Andrew F. March, ‘Is there a right to polygamy? Marriage, equality and subsidizing families in liberal public justification’, Journal of Moral Philosophy (forthcoming, 2010).
5. T. M. Scanlon, ‘The diversity of objections to inequality’, in The Difficulty of Tolerance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 202–218.
6. Andrew Stivers and Andrew Valls, ‘Same-sex marriage and the regulation of language’, Politics Philosophy Economics 6,2 (2007): 237–253.
7. Tamara Metz, ‘The liberal case for disestablishing marriage’, Contemporary Political Theory 6 (2007): 196–217.
8. Martha C. Nussbaum, Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004)
9. Jonathan Haidt, Paul Rozin, Clark McCauley & Sumio Imada, ‘Body, psyche, and culture: The relationship of disgust to morality’, Psychology and Developing Societies 9,1 (1997): 107–131
10. Stephen Macedo, ‘Homosexuality and the conservative mind’, Georgetown Law Journal 84,2 (1995): 261–300, at pp. 278–9.
11. Carolyn S. Bratt, ‘Incest statues and the fundamental right of marriage: Is Oedipus free to marry?’ Family Law Quarterly 18 (1984–5): 257–309, at pp. 298–9.
12. Allen Buchanan, ‘Institutions, beliefs and ethics: Eugenics as a case study’, Journal of Political Philosophy 15,1 (2007): 22–45.
13. Cynthia A. Stark, ‘How to include the severely disabled in a contractarian theory of justice’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 15,2 (2007): 127–145.
14. Dan W. Brock, ‘Shaping future children: Parental rights and societal interests’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 13,4 (2005): 377–398, at pp. 386–391
15. Stephen Macedo, ‘Transformative constitutionalism and the case of religion: Defending the moderate hegemony of liberalism’, Political Theory, 26,1 (1998): 56–80
16. Robin L. Bennett, Kathryn S. French, Robert G. Resta & Debra L. Doyle, ‘Genetic counseling and screening of consanguineous couples and their offspring: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors’, Journal of Genetic Counseling 11,2 (2002): 97–119, at p. 104.
17. Robin L. Bennett, Kathryn S. French, Robert G. Resta & Debra L. Doyle, ‘Genetic counseling and screening of consanguineous couples and their offspring: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors’, Journal of Genetic Counseling 11,2 (2002): p. 107
18. Gregory S. Kavka, ‘The paradox of future individuals’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 11,2 (1982): 93–112
19. James Woodward, ‘The non-identity problem’, Ethics 96 (1986): 804–831
20. Jeff McMahan, ‘Wrongful life: Paradoxes in the morality of causing people to exist’, in J. L. Coleman & C.W. Morris (eds) Rational Commitment and Social Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)
21. Matthew Hanser, ‘Harming future people’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 19,1 (1990): 47–70
22. Dan Brock, ‘The non-identity problem and genetic harms:The case of wrongful handicaps’, Bioethics 9 (1995): 269–75
23. Seana Valentine Shiffrin, ‘Wrongful life, procreative responsibility, and the significance of harm’, Legal Theory 5,2 (1999): 117–48
24. Elisabeth Harman, ‘Can we harm and benefit in creating?’ Philosophical Perspectives, 18 (2004): 89–113.
25. Robert Sparrow, ‘Defending deaf culture:The case of cochlear implants’, Journal of Political Philosophy 13,2 (2005): 135–152
26. Guy Kahane, ‘Non-identity, self-defeat, and attitudes to future children’, Philosophical Studies 145,2 (2009): 193–214.
27. Robert L. Hayman Jr., ‘Presumptions of justice: Law, politics and the mentally retarded parent’, Harvard Law Review 103,6 (1990): 1201–1271
28. Allen Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels & Daniel Wikler, From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 246
29. Dov Fox, ‘The illiberality of ‘liberal eugenics’,’ Ratio 20,1 (2007): 1–25