Enabling multi-faceted measures of success for protected area management in Trinidad and Tobago

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 185-195

  Granderson, Ainka A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Caribbean; Conservation; Evaluation; Protected area; Stakeholder participation; Success; Sustainable development; Trinidad and Tobago

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PROTECTED AREA; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CENTRAL AMERICA; CONSUMER; ECOLOGY; EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; POLICY; POLITICS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO;

BIODIVERSITY; CARIBBEAN REGION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; ECOLOGY; EDUCATION; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONS; POLITICS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO;

TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO;

EID: 79952858716     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Axford J.C., Hockings M.T., Carter R.W. What constitutes success in Pacific island community conserved areas?. Ecology and Society 2008, 13(2):45.
2. Developing focus group research: Politics, research and practice 1999, Sage, London, UK. R. Barbour, J. Kitzinger (Eds.).
3. Barr K.H. Geological outline. The natural resources of Trinidad and Tobago 1981, 13-22. Edward Arnold Publishers, London, UK. P.R. Bacon, G.C. Cooper (Eds.).
4. Brisolara S. The history of participatory evaluation and current debates in the field. New Directions for Evaluation 1998, 80:25-41.
5. Brown K. Innovations for conservation and development. The Geographic Journal 2002, 168(1):6-17.
6. Brown K., Tompkins E., Adger W.N. Trade-off analysis for participatory coastal zone decision-making 2001, Overseas Development Group/University of East Anglia.
7. Caribbean Forest Conservation Association (CFCA) National parks draft management and physical plan and additional studies: Final report 1998, Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago and World Bank, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad.
8. Chambers R. Whose reality counts? Putting the first last 1997, Intermediate Technology, London, UK.
9. Cifuentes M., Izurieta A., de Faria H. Measuring protected area management effectiveness 2000, IUCN/World Wildlife Fund, Turrialba, Costa Rica.
10. Conley A., Moote M.A. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 2003, 16:371-386.
11. Convention on Biological Diversity Programme of work on protected areas 2004, Retrieved from http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7765.
12. Cousins J.B., Whitmore E. Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation 1998, 80:5-23.
13. Daigneault P., Jacob S. Toward accurate measurement of participation: Rethinking the conceptualization and operationalization of participatory evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 2009, 30(3):330-348.
14. Danielson F., Burgess N.D., Balmford A., Donald P.F., Funder M., Jones J.P.G., et al. Local participation in natural resource monitoring: A characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology 2009, 23(1):31-42.
15. DeGroff A., Cargo M. Policy implementation: Implications for evaluation. Knowledge utilization, diffusion, implementation, transfer, and translation: Implications for evaluation 2009, New Directions for Evaluation, 124, 47-60. J.M. Ottoson, P. Hawe (Eds.).
16. Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) Rules 2001, Trinidad and Tobago Environmental Management Authority, Ministry of Public Utilities and the Environment.
17. Ervin J. WWF rapid assessment and prioritization of protected area management (RAPPAM) methodology 2003, World Wildlife Fund, Gland, Switzerland.
18. Estrella M., Gaventa J. Who counts reality? Participatory monitoring and evaluation: A literature review. IDS working paper, 70 1998.
19. Esty D.C., Levy M., Srebotnjak T., de Sherbinin A. Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship 2005, Yale Centre for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven.
20. Fairhead J., Leach M. Science, society and power: Environmental knowledge and policy in West Africa and the Caribbean 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York.
21. Ferraro P.J., Pattanayak S.K. Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biology 2006, 4(4):105.
22. Granderson A. Report on workshop on measuring the success and feasibility of participatory management of protected areas held on July 25, 2006 at the Environmental Management Authority 2007.
23. Granderson A. Report on focus group on measuring the success and feasibility of participatory management of protected areas held on December 21, 2006 at the Environmental Management Authority 2007.
24. Gurevitch J., Curtis P.S., Jones M.H. Meta-analysis in ecology. Advances in Ecological Research 2001, 32:199-247.
25. Henwood K.L., Lang I. Qualitative research resources: A consultation with UK social scientists 2003, Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon, UK.
26. Hockings M. Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. Bioscience 2003, 53(9):823-832.
27. Hockings M., James R., Stolton S., Dudley N., Mathur V., Makomobo J., et al. Enhancing our heritage toolkit: Assessing management effectiveness of natural World Heritage sites. World Heritage Papers, 23 2008, UNESCO.
28. Hockings M., Stolton S., Dudley N. Evaluating effectiveness: A framework for assessing the management effectiveness of protected areas 2006, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
29. Hockings M., Stolton S., Dudley N., James R. Data credibility: What are the " right" data for evaluating management effectiveness of protected areas?. Environmental program and policy evaluation: Addressing methodological challenges 2009, New Directions for Evaluation, 122, 53-63. M. Birnbaum, P. Mickwitz (Eds.).
30. Homer F. Trinidad and Tobago 3rd national report to the conferences of the parties. Convention on biological diversity 2005, Ministry of Public Utilities and the Environment, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad.
31. Huberman M. Research utilization: The state of the art. Knowledge and Policy 1994, 7(4):13-33.
32. Huberman M., Cox P. Evaluation utilization: Building links between action and reflection. Studies in Educational Evaluation 1990, 16:157-179.
33. Institute of Marine Affairs (IMA) Draft technical report for the Nariva management plan: Wetlands ecology. Document prepared for the Ministry of Agriculture, Land and Marine Resources, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad 1999.
34. King J.A. Participatory evaluation. Encyclopedia of evaluation 2005, 291-294. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. S. Mathison (Ed.).
35. Krishnarayan V., Geoghegan T., Renard Y. Assessing capacity for participatory natural resource management. CANARI 2002.
36. Leverington F., Hockings M., Lemos Costa K. Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas. Report for project " Global study into management effectiveness of protected areas." 2008, IUCN, TNC, University of Queensland, WWF Australia.
37. Leviton L.C., Hughes E.F.X. Research on the utilization of evaluations: A review and synthesis. Evaluation Review 1981, 5:525-547.
38. Litoselliti L. Using focus groups in research 2003, Continuum, London, UK.
39. Mathie A., Green J.C. Stakeholder participation in evaluation: How important is diversity?. Evaluation and Program Planning 1997, 20:279-285.
40. Moote M.A., McClaran M.P., Chickering D.K. Theory in practice: Applying participatory democracy theory to public land planning. Environmental Management 1997, 21(6):877-889.
41. Murray G.D. Multifaceted measures of success in two Mexican marine protected areas. Society and Natural Resources 2005, 18:889-905.
42. Pagdee A., Kim Y., Daugherty P.J. What makes community forest management successful: A meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources 2006, 19(1):33-52.
43. Parkinson S. Power and perceptions in participatory monitoring and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning 2009, 32:229-237.
44. Pomeroy R.S., Parks J.E., Watson L.M. How is your MPA doing? A guidebook of natural and social indicators for evaluating marine protected area management effectiveness 2004, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
45. Managing natural resources for sustainable livelihoods: Uniting science and participation 2003, Earthscan, IDRC, London, UK. B. Pound, S. Snapp, C. McDougall, A. Braun (Eds.).
46. Rossi P.H., Lipsey M.W., Freeman H.E. Evaluation: A systematic approach 2004, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 7th ed.
47. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values 2000, 25(3):3-29.
48. Saterson K.A., Christensen N.L., Jackson R.B., Kramer R.A., Pimm S.L., Smith M.D., et al. Disconnects in evaluating the relative effectiveness of conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 2004, 18(3):597-599.
49. Spradley J.P. Participant Observation 1980, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
50. Stem C., Margoluis R., Salafsky N., Brown M. Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: A review of trends and approaches. Conservation Biology 2005, 19(2):295-309.
51. The Nature Conservancy (TNC) The parks in peril site consolidation scorecard. Parks in Peril Program 2006.
52. Tompkins E., Adger W.N., Brown K. Institutional networks for inclusive coastal management in Trinidad and Tobago. Environment and Planning A 2002, 34:1095-1111.
53. Weaver L., Cousins J.B. Unpacking the participatory process. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation 2004, 1:19-40.