The history of participatory evaluation and current debates in the field

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 1998, Issue 80, 1998, Pages 25-41

  Brisolara, Sharon ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960732761     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1115     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Alkin, M., and Law, A., “A Conversation on Evaluation Utilization.“Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2 (3), 73-79.
2. Argyris, C., Putnam, R. and McLain Smith, D. (eds.) Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
3. Bender, F.L. (ed.).Karl Marx: Essential Writings.(2nd ed.).Boulder: Westview Press, 1986, pp. 152-155.
4. Benhabib, S., “Epistemologies of Postmodernism: A Rejoinder to Jean Francois Lyotard.“In L. J.Nicholson (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism, New York: Routledge, 1990.
5. Bernstein, R.J., Praxis and Action: Contemporary Philosophies of Human Activity.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1971.
6. Brown, L. D., and Tandon, R., “Ideology and Political Economy in Inquiry: Action Research and Participatory Research.“Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1983, 18, 227-294.
7. Brunner, I., and Guzman, A., “Participatory Evaluation: A Tool to Assess Projects and Empower People.“In R. F. Connor., and M. Hendricks., (eds.), International Innovations in Evaluation Methodology. New Directions for Evaluation, no. 42. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989.
8. Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C., Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research.Skokie, Ill.: Rand McNally, 1963.
9. Chambers, R., “The Origins and Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal.“World Development, 1994, 22(7), 953-969.
10. Chambers, R., Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last.London: Intermediate Technology Publications, 1997.
11. Chelimsky, E., “The Politics of Program Evaluation.“In D. S. Cordray., H. S. Bloom., and R. J. Light., (eds.), Evaluation Practice in Review. New Directions for Evaluation, no. 34. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
12. Chen, H., and Rossi, P. (eds.).Using Theory to Improve Program and Policy Evaluations.Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1992.
13. Cousins, J. B., and Earl, L. M. (eds.).Participatory Evaluation in Education: Studies in Evaluation Use and Organizational Learning.London: Falmer, 1995.
14. Cousins, J. B., and Leithwood, K. A., “Current Empirical Research on Evaluation Utilization.“Review of Educational Research, 1986, 56(3), 331-364.
15. Cracknell, B., “Evaluating Development Aid: Strengths and Weaknesses.“Evaluation, 1996, 2(1), 23-34.
16. D’arcy de Oliveira, R., and D’arcy de Oliveira, M., The Militant Observer: A Sociological Alternative.Geneva: Institut d’Action Culturelle, 1975.
17. Dewey, J., Logic: The Theory of Inquiry.New York: Henry Holt, 1938.
18. Dewey, J., Reconstructions in Philosophy.Boston: Beacon Press, 1960. (Originally published 1920.)
19. Elliot, J., Action Research for Educational Change.Bristol, Pa.: Open University Press, 1991.
20. Fals-Borda, O., “The Application of Participatory Action-Research in Latin America.“International Sociology, 1987, 2(4), 329-347.
21. Fals-Borda, O., and Rahman, M., Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research.New York: Apex Press, 1991.
22. Fay, B., Critical Social Science: Liberation and Its Limits.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1987.
23. Fetterman, D. M., Speaking the Language of Power: Communication, Collaboration, and Advocacy (Translating Ethnography into Action).London: Falmer, 1993.
24. Fine, M., and Vanderslice, V., “Reflections on Qualitative Research.“In E.Posavac (ed.) Methodological Issues in Applied Social Psychology.New York: Plenum, 1992.
25. Firestone, W. A., “Accommodation: Toward a Paradigm-Praxis Dialectic.“In Y.Lincoln and E.Guba (eds.), Paradigm Dialog.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1990.
26. Fonow, M. M., and Cook, J. A., “Back to the Future: A Look at the Second Wave of Feminist Epistemology and Methodology.“In M. M.Fonow and J. A.Cook (eds.), Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research.Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.
27. Foucault, M., Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Writings 1972-1977(C.Gordon, ed.). New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.
28. Freire, P., La Educación como práctica de la libertad.Montevideo: Tierra Nueva, 1965.
29. Freire, P., Pedagogy of the Oppressed.New York: Continuum, 1990.
30. Frost, P., Moore, L. F., Rees, M. L., Lundby, C. C., and Martin, J., Reframing Organizational Culture.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1991.
31. Gaventa, J., Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
32. Gaventa, J., “The Powerful, the Powerless, and the Experts: Knowledge Struggles in an Information Age.“In P.Park, M.Brydon-Miller, B.Hall, and T.Jackson (eds.), Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada, Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) Press, 1993, pp. 21-40.
33. Gaventa, J., and Horton, B., “A Citizen’s Research Project in Appalachia, USA.“In An Approach to Education Presented Through a Collection of Writings.New Market, Tenn: Highlander Research and Education Center, 1989, pp. 220-229.
34. Geertz, C., The Interpretation of Cultures.New York: Basic Books, 1973.
35. Gerace Larufa, F., Comunicación horizontal.Lima: Libraria Studium, 1973.
36. Greene, J. G., “Stakeholder Participation and Utilization in Program Evaluation.“Evaluation Review, 1988, 12(2), 91-116.
37. Greene, J.C., “Qualitative Evaluation and Scientific Citizenship: Reflections and Refractions." Evaluation.London: Sage, 1996, pp. 277-289.
38. Greene, J. G., “Evaluation as Advocacy.“Evaluation Practice, 1997, 18(1), 25-35.
39. Habermas, J., Knowledge and Human Interests (J. Shapiro, trans.). Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.
40. Hall, B., “Knowledge as a Commodity and Participatory Research.“Prospects, 9 (4), 1979.
41. Hall, B. L., “Participatory Research, Popular Knowledge and Power: A Personal Reflection.“Convergence, 1981, 14(3), 6-19.
42. Hall, B. L., “From Margins to Center? The Development and Purpose of Participatory Research.“American Sociologist, winter 1992, pp. 15-28.
43. Harding, S., Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991.
44. Heshusius, L., “Freeing Ourselves from Objectivity: Managing Subjectivity or Turning Toward a Participatory Mode of Consciousness.“Educational Researcher, 1994, 23(3), 15-22.
45. Howe, K. R., and Eisenhart, M., “Standards for Qualitative (and Quantitative) Research: A Prolegomenon.“Educational Researcher, 1990, 19(4), 2-9.
46. Jackson, E. T., “Environmental Assessment in Big Trout Lake, Canada.“Paper presented at the International Forum on Participatory Research, Ljubljana, Yugoslavia, 1980.
47. Jaggar, A. M., “Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology.“In A. M.Jaggar, and S.Bordo (eds.), Gender, Body, Knowledge.New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1989.
48. Kidder, L. H., and Fine, M., “Making Sense of Injustice: Social Explanations, Social Action, and the Role of the Social Scientist.“In E.Seidman and J.Rappaport (eds.), Redefining Social Problems.New York: Plenum, 1986.
49. Kidder, L. H., and Fine, M., “Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: When Stories Converge.“In M. M. Mark., and R. L. Shotland., (eds.), Multiple Methods in Program Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, no. 35. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
50. Lather, P., “Research as Praxis.“Harvard Educational Review, Aug. 1986, 56 (3), 257-277.
51. Lather, P., Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy Within the Postmodern.New York: Routledge, 1991.
52. Lewin, K., “Action Research and Minority Problems.“Journal of Social Issues, 1946, 2, 34-46.
53. Lincoln, Y., and Guba, E., Naturalistic Inquiry.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1985.
54. Lukes, S., Power: A Radical View.London: Macmillan, 1974.
55. MacDonald, B., “Evaluation and the Control of Education.“In D. A.Tawney (ed.), Curriculum Evaluation Today: Trends and Implications.Schools Council Research Studies. London: Macmillan, 1976.
56. Maguire, P., Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach.Amherst: Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts, 1987.
57. marino, d., Wild Garden: Art, Education, and the Culture of Resistance.Toronto: Between the Lines, 1997.
58. Mark, M. M., and Shotland, R. L., “Stakeholder-Based Evaluation and Value Judgments: The Role of Perceived Power and Legitimacy in the Selection of Stakeholder Groups." Evaluation Review, 1985, 9, 605-626.
59. Marx, K., Theses on Feuerbach. (Originally published 1845.)
60. McLellan, D. (ed.).Karl Marx: Selected Writing.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
61. McTaggart, R., Action Research: A Short Modern History.Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press, 1991.
62. Noffke, S., “Action Research: Towards the Next Generation.“Educational Action Research, 1994, 2(1), 9-21.
63. Papineau, D., and Kiely, M. C., “Participatory Evaluation in a Community Organization: Fostering Stakeholder Empowerment and Utilization.“Evaluation and Program Planning, Feb. 1996, 19 (1), 79-94.
64. Patton, M. Q., Utilization-Focused Evaluation.(3rd ed.)Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1997.
65. Preskill, H., “The Cultural Lens: Bringing Utilization into Focus.“In C. L.Larson and H.Preskill (eds.), Organizations in Transition: Opportunities and Challenges for Evaluation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
66. Pursley, L. A., “Empowerment and Utilization Through Participatory Evaluation.“Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Human Service Studies, Cornell University, 1996.
67. Rabinow, P., and Sullivan, W. M., Interpretive Social Science: A Reader.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.
68. Rahnema, M., “Participatory Action Research: The ‘Last Temptation’ of Saint Development.“Alternatives, 1990, 15, 199-226.
69. Reason, P. (ed.).Human Inquiry into Action: Developments in New Paradigm Research.London: Sage, 1988.
70. Reichardt, C. S., and Cook, T. D., “Beyond Qualitative Versus Quantitative Methods.“In T. D.Cook and C. S.Reichardt (eds.), Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1979.
71. Reinharz, S., Feminist Methods in Social Research.New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
72. Rossman, G. B., and Wilson, B. L., “Numbers and Words: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in a Single Large Scale Evaluation Study.“Evaluation Review, 1985, 9, 627-643.
73. Rowan, J., and Reason, P., “On Making Sense.“In P.Reason and J.Rowan (eds.), Human Inquiry: A Source Book of New Paradigm Research.New York: Wiley, 1981.
74. Rugh, J., Self-Evaluation: Ideas for Participatory Evaluation of Rural Community Development Projects.Oklahoma City: World Neighbors, 1984.
75. Schwandt, T. A., “Evaluation as Moral Critique.“In C. L. Larson., and H. Preskill., (eds.), Organizations in Transition: Opportunities and Challenges for Evaluation. New Directions in Evaluation, no. 49. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
76. Stake, R. E., “To Evaluate an Arts Program.“In R. E.Stake (ed.), Evaluating Arts Education: A Responsive Approach.Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1975.
77. Stanley, L., and Wise, S., “Feminist Research, Feminist Consciousness, and Experiences of Sexism.“In M. M.Fonow and J. A.Cook (eds.), Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research.Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.
78. Stenhouse, L., An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development.London: Heinemann, 1975.
79. Studer, S., “A Validity Study of a Measure of ‘Readiness to Accept Program Evaluation.'" Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1978.
80. Stufflebeam, D. L., “An Introduction to the PDK Book.“In B.Worthern and J. R.Sanders (eds.), Educational Evaluation: Theory and Practice.Worthington: Jones, 1973.
81. Thomas, J., Doing Critical Ethnography.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1993.
82. Thompson, R. J., “Evaluator as Power Broker: Issues in Maghreb.“In R. F. Conner., and M. Hendricks., (eds.), International Innovations in Evaluation Methodology. New Directions for Evaluation, no. 42. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989.
83. Tikunoff, W. J., Ward, B. A., and Griffin, G. A., Interactive Research and Development on Teaching: Final Report.San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Education Research and Development, 1979.
84. Trochim, W.M.K., “Pattern Matching, Construct Validity, and Conceptualization in Program Evaluation.“Evaluation and Program Planning, 1985, 9, 575-604.
85. Warry, W., “The Eleventh Thesis: Applied Anthropology as Practice.“Human Organization, 1992, 51(2), 155-163.
86. Weiler, K., “Freire and a Feminist Pedagogy of Difference.“Harvard Educational Review, 1991, 61(4), 449-474.
87. Weiss, C. H., “Utilization of Evaluation: Toward Comparative Study.“In C. H.Weiss (ed.), Evaluating Action Programs: Readings in Social Action and Education.Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1972.
88. Weiss, C. H., “Where Politics and Evaluation Research Meet.“Evaluation, 1973, 1 (3), 37-45.
89. Weiss, H. B., and Greene, J. C., “An Empowerment Partnership for Family Support and Education Programs and Evaluation.“Family and Science Review, 1992, 5, 131-149.
90. Whitmore, E., “Evaluation and Empowerment: A Case Example.“Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Evaluation, New Orleans, 1988.
91. Whitmore, E., and Kerans, P., “Participation, Empowerment and Welfare.“Canadian Review of Social Policy, 1988, 22, 51-60.
92. Whyte, W. F., Participatory Action Research.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1991.