Training organisations and their perceptions of graduate work skills

Australian Journal of Medical Science

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 122-130

  Streitberg, George S ^a   Angel, Lyndall ^b   Sikaris, Kenneth ^c   Bwititi, Phillip ^b  

^a MONASH MEDICAL CENTRE   (Australia)

^b CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c Melbourne Pathology ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

Automation; Expert systems; Graduate staff

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL SUPERVISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SKILL; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TRAINING; WORKLOAD;

EID: 79952827750     PISSN: 10381643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AAPOR. 2008. The American Association for Public Opinion Research Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Lenexa, Kansas, The American Association for Public Opinion Research.
2. AQF Advisory Board. 2007. The Australian Qualifications Framework Implementation Handbook. 4th Ed. AQF Advisory Board.
3. Badrick T. 2007. Is there a future for medical scientists and their associations? Aust J Med Sci 28: 3-14. (Pubitemid 46447619)
4. Beck S, Briden M, Epner PL. 2008. Practice levels and educational needs for clinical laboratory personnel. Clin Lab Sci 21: 68-77.
5. Carter. 2006. Report of the Review of NHS Pathology Services in England, Department of Health: 1-89.
6. Castillo J, Lien J, Steiner J. 1997. Integrated regional laboratory systems: implications for staffing and skill mix requirements. Clin Lab Manage Rev 11: 6-14.
7. De Rada VD. 2005. The effect of follow-up mailings on the response rate and response quality in mail surveys. Qual Quant 39: 1-18. (Pubitemid 40526419)
8. Dominiczak MH. 1999. Laboratory medicine: the need for a broader view - the "multiple bundle" model of clinical laboratory function. Clin Chem Lab Med 37: 97-100. (Pubitemid 29139774)
9. Heberlein TA, Baumgartner RA. 1978). Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published Literature. Am Sociol Rev 43: 447-462.
10. Hoffmann GE. 1998). Concepts for the third generation of laboratory systems. Clini Chim Acta 278: 203-216. (Pubitemid 29050844)
11. Kent G. 1999. Automation & Core Labs - Lessons Learned. Clin Biochem News: 15-16.
12. McCoy M, Hargie O. 2007. Effects of personalization and envelope color on response rate, speed and quality among a business population. Industr Market Manage 36: 799-809.
13. McGregor L, Moriarty H. 2003. The professional status of medical scientists in Australia: a nationwide survey of medical scientists, other health professionals and the general public. Aust J Med Sci 24: 140-155. (Pubitemid 36988435)
14. Nardella D. 2003. Review of the Victorian Pathology Services Accreditation Act 1984: Final Report. Melbourne, Victorian Government Department of Human Services: 1-69.
15. NPAAC 2007. Requirements for the Supervision of Pathology Laboratories (2007 Edition). Canberra, National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council.
16. PAC 2009. Scope of Practice of the Scientific Workforce of the Pathology Laboratory. Accessed 30 November 2010.
17. Paxton A. 2008. Flexing connectivity muscle with middleware. CAP Today, March. College of American Pathologists.
18. Snyder J. 1992. Technician or technologist? Sorting out overlapping roles in the lab. Med Lab Observ 24 (June): 36-36,39-41.
19. Working-Party 2005. A Model for Determining Minimum Senior Staffing in Departments of Clinical Biochemistry (Chemical Pathology):1-10. http://acb.org.uk/federation/information/conditions/staffing.htm. Accessed 19 March 2006