Conductive keratoplasty for the treatment of presbyopia: Comparative study between post- and non-LASIK eyes

Clinical Ophthalmology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 231-237

  Tomita, Minoru ^a   Watabe, Miyuki ^a   Ito, Mitsutoshi ^a   Tsuru, Tadahiko ^a  

^a Shinagawa LASIK Center   (Japan)

Author keywords

CK; Conductive keratoplasty; Post LASIK; Presbyopia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE EXAMINATION; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMILEUSIS; KERATOPLASTY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PREDICTION; PRESBYOPIA; RISK ASSESSMENT; THERAPY EFFECT; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 79952823657     PISSN: 11775467     EISSN: 11775483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S16791     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Guputa N, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn S. Visual comparison of multifocal lens to monovision. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86:E98-E105.
2. Reilly CD, Lee WB, Alvarenga L, et al. Surgical monovision and monovision reversal in LASIK. Cornea. 2006;25:136-138.
3. Braun EHP, Lee J, Steinert RF. Monovision in LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1196-1202.
4. Telandro A. The pseudoaccommodative cornea multifocal ablation with a center-distance pattern: a Review. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25(Suppl):S156-S159.
5. El Danasoury AM, Gamaly TO, Hantera M. Multizone. LASIK with peripheral near zone for correction of presbyopia in myopic and hyperopic eyes: 1-year results. J Refract Surg. 2009;25: 296-305.
6. Uy E, Go R. Pseudoaccommodative cornea treatment using the NIDEK EC-5000 CXIII excimer laser in myopic and hyperopic presbyopes. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(Suppl):S148-S155.
7. McDonald MB, Hersh PS, Manche EE, et al, and the Conductive Keratoplasty United States Investigators Group. Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia: US clinical trial 1-year results on 355 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2002;109: 1978-1989.
8. Alió JL, Claramonte PJ, Cáliz A, Ramzy MI. Corneal modeling of keratoconus by conductive keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:190-197.
9. Naoumidi TL, Kounis GA, Astyrakakis NI, et al. Two-year follow-up of conductive keratoplasty for the treatment of hyperopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:732-741.
10. McDonald MB, Durrie D, Asbell P, et al. Treatment of presbyopia with conductive keratoplasty® six-month results of the 1-year United States FDA clinical trial. Cornea. 2004;23:661-668.
11. Stahl JE. Conductive keratoplasty for presbyopia: 1-year results. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:137-144.
12. Stahl JE. Conductive keratoplasty for presbyopia: 3-year results. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:905-910.
13. Alió JL, Ramzy MI, Galal A, Claramonte PJ. Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of residual hyperopia after LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:698-704.
14. Seiler T, Koufala K, Richter G. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 1998;14:312-317.
15. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea. 2009;28:765-769.
16. Comaish IF, Lawless MA. Conductive keratoplasty to correct residual hyperopia after corneal surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:202-206.
17. Hersh PS, Fry KL, Chandrashekhar R, Fikaris DS. Conductive keratoplasty to treat complications of LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1941-1947.
18. Daivis EA, Fahmy AM. Stage III diffuse lamellar keratitis following conductive keratoplasty over a LASIK flap. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1141-1143.
19. Kymionis GD, Titze P, Markomanolakis MM, et al. Corneal perforation after conductive keratoplasty with previous refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2452-2454.
20. Pallikaris IG, Naoumidi TL, Astyrakakis NI. Long-term results of conductive keratoplasty for low to moderate hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1520-1529.