Human performance on negative slope schedules of points exchangeable for money: A failure of molar maximization

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 241-260

  Jacobs, Eric A ^a   Hackenberg, Timothy D ^b  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult humans; Feedback functions; Matching; Maximization; Negative slope schedules; Panel press; Variable interval schedules

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REINFORCEMENT;

ADULT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; TOKEN ECONOMY;

EID: 0034181743     PISSN: 00225002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-241     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 137-153.
2. Baum, W. M. (1992). In search of the feedback function for variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 365-375.
3. Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., & Bevan, P. (1976). Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 135-141.
4. Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., & Bevan, P. (1977). Effect of punishment on human variable-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 275-279.
5. Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., & Bevan, P. (1979). The effect of punishment on free-operant choice in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 71-81.
6. Ettinger, R. H., Reid, A. K., & Staddon, J. E. R. (1987). Sensitivity to molar feedback functions: A test of molar optimality theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 366-375.
7. Fleshier, M., & Hoffman, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 529-530.
8. Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243-266.
9. Herrnstein, R. J., Loewenstein, G. E. Prelec, D., & Vaughan, W., Jr. (1993). Utility maximization and melioration: Internalities in individual choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 149-185.
10. Heyman, G. M., & Tanz, L. (1995). How to teach a pigeon to maximize overall reinforcement rate. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 277-297.
11. Home, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1993). Determinants of human performance on concurrent schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 29-60.
12. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
13. Kudadjie-Gyamfi, E., & Rachlin, H. (1996). Temporal patterning in choice among delayed outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 61-67.
14. Madden, G. J., & Perone, M. (1999). Human sensitivity to concurrent schedules of reinforcement: Effects of observing schedule-correlated stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 303-318.
15. Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. McDowell, J. J, & Wood, H. M. (1984). Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: Changes in Herrnstein's k as a function of changes in reinforcer magnitude. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 183-192.
17. Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233-244.
18. Reed, P., & Schachtman, T. R. (1991). Instrumental performance on negative schedules. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 177-197.
19. Silberberg, A., Warren-Boulton, F. R., & Asano, T. (1988). Maximizing present value: A model to explain why moderate response rates obtain on variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 331-338.
20. Vaughan, W., Jr. (1982). Choice and the Rescorla-Wagner model. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 2. Matching and maximizing accounts (pp. 263-279). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
21. Vaughan, W., Jr., & Miller, H. L., Jr. (1984). Optimization versus response-strength accounts of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 337-348.