Gene Flow in Sugar Beet

Sugar Tech

Volumn 12, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 201-206

  Bartsch, Detlef ^a  

^a Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bolter control; Gene flow; Isolation distances; Seed production

Indexed keywords

BETA MACROCARPA; BETA TRIGYNA; BETA VULGARIS; BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS;

EID: 79952814936     PISSN: 09721525     EISSN: 09740740     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12355-010-0053-1     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Abe, J., G.-P. Guan, and Y. Shimamoto. 1997. A gene complex for annual habit in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Euphytica 94: 129-135.
2. Andersen, N. S., H. R. Siegismund, and R. B. Jørgensen. 2005. Low level of gene flow from cultivated beets (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris) into Danish populations of sea beet (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. maritima (L.) Arcangeli). Molecular Ecology 14: 1391-1405.
3. Arnaud, J. F., S. Fénart, C. Godé, S. Deledicque, P. Touzet, and J. Cuguen. 2009. Fine-scale geographical structure of genetic diversity in inland wild beet populations. Molecular Ecolology 18: 3201-3215.
4. Arnaud, J.-F., F. Viard, M. Delescluse, and J. Cuguen. 2003. Evidence for gene flow via seed dispersal from crop to wild relatives in Beta vulgaris (Chenopodiaceae): Consequences for the release of genetically modified crop species with weedy lineages. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270: 1565-1571.
5. Bartsch, D., J. Cuguen, E. Biancardi, and J. Sweet. 2003. Environmental implications of gene flow from sugar beet to wild beet-current status and future research needs. Environmental Biosafety Research 2: 105-115.
6. Bartsch, D., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1999. Genetic evidence for the origin of Californian wild beets (genus Beta). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 1120-1130.
7. Bartsch, D., M. Lehnen, J. Clegg, M. Pohl-Orf, I. Schuphan, and N. C. Ellstrand. 1999. Impact of gene flow from cultivated beet on genetic diversity of wild sea beet populations. Molecular Ecology 8: 1733-1741.
8. Bartsch, D., and G. Schmitz. 2002. Recent experience with biosafety research and role of post-market environmental monitoring in risk management of plant biotechnology derived crops. In Biotechnology, safety assessment, 3rd ed, ed. R. Fuchs, and J. Thomas, 13-38. San Diego: Academic Press.
9. Boudry, P., H. McCombie, and H. van Dijk. 2002. Vernalization requirement of wild beet Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: Among population variation and its adaptive significance. Journal of Ecology 90: 693-703.
10. Boudry, P., R. Wieber, P. Saumitou-Laprade, K. Pillen, H. van Dijk, and C. Jung. 1994. Identification of RFLP markers closely linked to the bolting gene B and their significance for the study of the annual habit in beets (Beta vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88: 852-858.
11. Büttner, B., S. F. Abou-Elwafa, W. Zhang, C. Jung, and A. E. Müller. 2010. A survey of EMS-induced biennial Beta vulgaris mutants reveals a novel bolting locus which is unlinked to the bolting gene. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121: 1117-1131.
12. Cain, M. L., B. G. Milligan, and A. E. Strand. 2000. Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations. American Journal of Botany 87: 1217-1227.
13. Colbach, N., H. Darmency, and Y. Tricault. 2010. Identifying key life-traits for the dynamics and gene flow in a weedy crop relative: Sensitivity analysis of the GENESYS simulation model for weed beet. Ecological Modelling 221: 225-237.
14. Cuguen, J., J. F. Arnaud, M. Delescluse, and F. Viard. 2003. Crop-wild interaction within the Beta vulgaris complex: A comparative analysis between seabeet and weed beet populations within the French sugarbeet production area. In Introgression from genetically modified plants into wild relatives, ed. H. C. M. Den Nijs, D. Bartsch, and J. Sweet, 183-201. Wallingford: CABI publishing.
15. Dale, M. F. B., and B. V. Ford-Lloyd. 1985. The significance of multigerm seedballs in the genus Beta. Watsonia 15: 265-267.
16. Darmency, H., E. K. Klein, T. G. De Garanbe, P.-H. Gouyon, M. Richard-Molard, and C. Muchembled. 2009. Pollen dispersal in sugar beet production fields. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118: 1083-1092.
17. Desplanque, B., N. Hautekeete, and H. van Dijk. 2002. Transgenic weed beets: Possible, probable, avoidable? Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 561-571.
18. Driessen, S., M. Pohl, and D. Bartsch. 2001. RAPD-PCR analysis of the genetic origin of sea beat (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) at Germany's Baltic sea coast. Basic and Applied Ecology 2: 341-349.
19. Ford-Lloyd, B. V., and J. G. Hawkes. 1986. Weed beets, their origin and classification. Acta Horticultura 82: 399-401.
20. Gressel, J. 2005. Introduction-the challenges of ferality. In Crop ferality and volunteerism, ed. J. Gressel, 1-7. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
21. Lavigne, C., E. K. Klein, and D. Couvet. 2002. Using seed purity data to estimate an average pollen mediated gene flow from crops to wild relatives. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 139-145.
22. Mücher, T., P. Hesse, M. Pohl-Orf, N. C. Ellstrand, and D. Bartsch. 2000. Characterization of weed beets in Germany and Italy. Journal of Sugar Beet Research 37: 19-38.
23. Nováková, K., M. Landová, J. Soukup, and J. Holec. 2006. Potential seed bank restoring of weed beet. In Proceedings of Conference Biotechnology, ed. Řehout, V., and Č. Budějovice, 474-476. Czech Republic.
24. OECD. 2001. Consensus document on the biology of Beta vulgaris L. (sugar beet). In Series on Harmonization of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No. 18. ENV/JM/MONO 11.
25. Pohl-Orf, M., U. Brand, S. Driessen, P. R. Hesse, and M. Lehnen. 1999. Overwintering of genetically modified sugar beet, Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris, as a source for dispersal of transgenic pollen. Euphytica 108: 181-186.
26. Sadeghian, S. Y., H. C. Becker, and E. Johansson. 1993. Inheritance of bolting in three sugar beet crosses after different periods of vernalization. Plant Breeding 104: 328-333.
27. Skaracis, G. N., and M. De Biaggi. 2005. Production of commercial varieties. In Genetics and breeding of sugar beet, ed. E. Biancardi, L. G. Campbell, G. N. Skaracis, and M. De Biaggi, 191-206. Enfield: Science publishers Inc.
28. Slyvchenko, O., and D. Bartsch. 2004. Introgression of cultivar beet genes to wild beet in the Ukraine. In Introgression from genetically modified plants into wild relatives and its consequences, ed. H. den Nijs, D. Bartsch, and J. Sweet, 173-182. Wallingford: CABI.
29. Soukup, J., and J. Holec. 2004. Crop/wild interaction within the Beta vulgaris complex: Agronomic aspects of weed beet in the Czech Republic. In Introgression from genetically modified plants into wild relatives, its consequences, ed. H. den Nijs, D. Bartsch, and J. Sweet, 203-218. Wallingford: CABI.
30. Soukup, J., J. Holec, P. Veijl, S. Skupinová, and P. Sedlák. 2002. Diversity and distribution of weed beet in the Czech Republic. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 18: 67-74.
31. Sukopp, U., M. Pohl, S. Driessen, and D. Bartsch. 2005. Feral beets-with help from the maritime wild? In Crop ferality and volunteerism, ed. J. Gressel, 45-57. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
32. van Dijk, H. 2004. Gene exchange between wild and crop in Beta vulgaris: How easy is hybridization and what will happen in later generations? In Introgression from genetically modified plants into wild relatives, its consequences, ed. H. den Nijs, D. Bartsch, and J. Sweet. Wallingford: CABI.
33. van Dijk, H., P. Boudry, H. McCombie, and P. Vernet. 1997. Flowering time in wild beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) along a latitudinal cline. Acta oecologia 18: 47-60.
34. van Dijk, H., and B. Desplanque. 1999. European Beta: Crops and their wild and weedy relatives. Plant evolution in man-made habitats. In Proc. Int. Symp. IOPB, 7th, Amsterdam, 257-270. Amsterdam: Hugo de Vries Laboratory.
35. van Geyt, J. P. C., W. Lange, M. Oleo, and T. S. M. De Bock. 1990. Natural variation within the genus Beta and its possible use for breeding sugar beet: A review. Euphytica 49: 57-76.
36. Vášová, Z. 1995. Plevelná řepa v cukrovce. Úroda 7: 36-37.
37. Viard, F., J. F. Arnaud, M. Delescluse, and J. Cuguen. 2004. Tracing back seed and pollen flow within the crop-wild Beta vulgaris complex: Genetic distinctiveness vs. hot spots of hybridization over a regional scale. Molecular Ecology 13: 357-1364.
38. Wehres, U. 2007. Untersuchungen zu potentiellen ökologischen Effekten von gentechnisch vermittelter Nematodenresistenz auf pflanzengenetische Ressourcen am Beispiel der Zuckerrüben-Wildform (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima). Dissertation RWTH Aachen. http://darwin. bth. rwth-aachen. de/opus3/volltexte/2007/2058/pdf/Wehres_Ute. pdf. Accessed 30 August 2010.