Steady-state simulation and optimization of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant with CO2 capture

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1674-1690

  Bhattacharyya, Debangsu ^a,b   Turton, Richard ^a,b   Zitney, Stephen E ^b  

^a West Virginia University   (United States)

^b NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COAL RESOURCES; COAL UTILIZATION; DECISION VARIABLES; DESIGN APPROACHES; DESIGN DECISIONS; DESIGN PHASE; DESIGN VARIABLES; DIMETHYL ETHERS; GLOBAL DESIGN; IMPROVING EFFICIENCY; INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE PLANTS; INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANTS; NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY; OPERATING CONDITION; OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY; OPTIMAL COMBINATION; OPTIMUM VALUE; PLANT EFFICIENCY; PLANT-WIDE OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS SIMULATORS; SOUR WATER; STEADY-STATE SIMULATIONS; TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS; THERMAL EFFICIENCY; TOPDOWN; WATER-GAS SHIFTS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON MONOXIDE; COAL DEPOSITS; COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANTS; DECISION MAKING; GASIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYETHYLENE OXIDES;

DESIGN;

EID: 79952802381     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie101502d     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy power plants study, Volume 1: Bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity; DOE/NETL-2007/1281; National Energy Technology Laboratory, August 2007; http://www.netl.doe.gov.
2. 2 washing Energy Convers. Manage. 1995, 36, 797-800
3. Ratafia-Brown, J. A.; Manfredo, L. M.; Hoffmann, J. W.; Ramezan, M.; Stiegel, G. J. An environmental assessment of IGCC power systems. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Sep 23-27, 2002.
4. Amick, P. The Wabash River IGCC project repowering coal fired power plants. GTC Gasification Workshop for Environmental Regulators; Tampa, FL, 2001.
5. Minchener, A. J. Coal gasificantion for advanced power generation Fuel 2005, 84, 2222-2235
6. Shilling, N.; Lee, D. IGCC-Clean power generation alternative for solid fuels. Proceedings of the PowerGen Asia 2003 Conference, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Sep 23-25, 2003.
7. Abadie, L. M.; Chamorro, J. M. Valuing Flexibility: The case of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plant Energy Economics 2008, 30, 1850-1881 (Pubitemid 351663969)
8. 2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part B: Economic analysis Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2005, 30, 769-784 (Pubitemid 40430611)
9. 2 abatement Energy Convers. Manage. 1997, 38, S153-S158
10. 2 avoidance Energy Convers. Manage. 2006, 47, 2250-2259
11. 2 removal. Report No. 1000316. EPRI: Palo Alto, CA; U. S. Department of Energy- Office of Fossil Energy, Germantown, MD; U.S. Department of Energy/NETL, Pittsburgh, PA: 2000.1000316, 2000.
12. 2 emission abatement in IGCC power plants by semiclosed cycles: Part A-with oxygen-blown combustion J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power-Trans. ASME 1999, 121, 635-641 (Pubitemid 129652444)
13. 2 emission IGCCs J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power-Trans. ASME 1999, 121, 295-305
14. 2 capture Int. J. Appl. Thermodyn. 1999, 2, 165-175
15. Mathieu, P. Zero emission technologies: An option for climate change mitigation Int. J. Green Energy 2005, 2, 193-199
16. Ulizar, I.; Pilidis, P. Handling of a semiclosed cycle gas turbine with a carbon dioxide-argon working fluid J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power-Trans. ASME 2000, 122, 437-441
17. 2 capture using integrated air separation and flue gas recycling Energy Convers. Manage. 1996, 37, 903-908 (Pubitemid 126356667)
18. Kunze, C.; Spliethoff, H. Modeling of an IGCC plant with carbon capture for 2020 Fuel Process. Technol. 2010, 91, 934-941
19. Frey, H. C.; Zhu, Y. Improved system integration for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) systems Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 1693-1699 (Pubitemid 43376414)
20. Anand, A. K.; Cook, C. S.; Corman, J. C.; Smith, A. R. New technology trends for improved IGCC system performance J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power-Trans. ASME 1996, 118, 732-736 (Pubitemid 126588217)
21. 2 emssions for an IGCC power generation system: Effect of variations in gasifier and system operating conditions Energy Convers. Manage. 2009, 50, 1915-1923
22. Emun, F.; Gadalla, M.; Majozi, T.; Boer, D. Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) process simulation and optimization Comput. Chem. Eng. 2010, 34, 331-338
23. Bahri, P. A.; Bandoni, A.; Romagnoli, J. Operability assessment of chemical plants Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, s787-s792
24. Bahri, P. A.; Bandoni, A.; Romagnoli, J. Integrated flexibility and controllability analysis in design of chemical processes AIChE J. 1996, 43, 997-1015
25. Pennline, H. W.; Luebke, D. R.; Jones, K. L.; Myers, C. R.; Morsi, B. I.; Heintz, Y. J.; Ilconich, J. B. Progress in carbon dioxide capture and separation research for gasification-based power generation point sources Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89, 897-907
26. Casleton, K. H.; Breault, R. W.; Richards, G. A. System issues and tradeoffs associated with syngas production and combustion Combust. Sci. Technol. 2008, 180, 1013-1052
27. 2 removal systems for fossil-fuelled power plant processes Energy Convers. Manage. 1997, 38, S173-S178
28. 2 capture Fuel 2008, 87, 14-24 (Pubitemid 350087927)
29. 2 capture Energy Convers. Manage. 1997, 38, S37-S42
30. 2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promision conversion and capture technologies Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2006, 32, 215-246 (Pubitemid 43238313)
31. Kohl, A.; Nielsen, R. Gas purification, 5th ed.; Gulf Professional Publishing: Houston, TX, 1997.
32. Bucklin, R. W.; Schendel, R. L. Comparison of physical solvents used for gas processing. In Acid and sour gas treating processes; Newman, S. A., Ed.; Gulf. Pub. Co.: Houston, TX, 1985.
33. Swenyint, J. W. Gas treating with a physical solvent. In Newman, S. A., Ed.; Acid and sour gas treating processes; Gulf. Pub. Co.: Houston, TX, 1985.
34. 2 capture using physical absorption, membrane reactors and chemical looping Fuel 2009, 88, 2463-2472
35. Aspen Plus 2006.5; Aspen Technology, Inc.: Cambridge, MA; www.aspentech.com.
36. Mcdaniel, J. E.; Shelnut, C. A.; Berry, T. E. Tampa Electric Company Polk power station IGCC Project Project status. Gasification Technologies Conference, San Francisco, CA, 1998.
37. 2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: performance and emissions Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2005, 30, 747-767
38. Kovacik, G.; Oǔztöreli, M.; Chambers, A.; Özüm, B. Equilibrium calculations in coal gasification Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1990, 15, 125-131
39. Govind, R.; Shah, J. Modeling and simulation of an entrained flow coal gasifier AIChE J. 1984, 30 (1) 79-92 (Pubitemid 14532503)
40. Liu, G. S.; Rezaei, H. R.; Lucas, J. A.; Harris, D. J.; Wall, T. F. Modelling of a pressurised entrained flow coal gasifier: the effect of reaction kinetics and char structure Fuel 2000, 79, 1767-1779
41. Wu, H.; Wall, T.; Liu, G.; Bryant, G. Ash liberation from included minerals during combustion of pulverized coal: The relationship with char structure and burnout Energy Fuels 1999, 13, 1197-1202 (Pubitemid 30513789)
42. Bailey, J. G.; Tate, A.; Diessel, C. F. K.; Wall, T. F. A char morphology sysytem with applications to coal combustion Fuel 1990, 69, 225-239 (Pubitemid 20707806)
43. Rees, O. Composition of the ash of Illinois coals; Illinois State Geological Survey: Champaign, IL, 1964, Circular 365.
44. Tampa electric POLK power Station Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Project, Final Technical Report; 2002, Tampa Electric Company, Tampa, FL, http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/cctc/cctdp/bibliography.
45. Robinson, P. J.; Luyben, W. L. Simple dynamic gasifier model that runs in Aspen Dynamics Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 7784-7792
46. Ohliger, A. A. Texacos use of infrared on process gasifier systems as a predictive maintenance tool and the effects of wind on infrared survey accuracy. InfraMation 2000 Proceedings, Orlando, FL, 2000.
47. Overstreet, A. D. A screening study of a new Water-gas Shift catalyst. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Blacksburg, VA, 1974.
48. Berispek, V. Studies of an alkali impregnated Cobalt-Molybdate catalyst for the Water-Gas Shift and the Methanation reactions; M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Blacksburg, VA, 1975.
49. Rase, H. F. Chemical reactor design for process plants, Vol. Two: Case studies and design data; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1977.
50. Carbo, M. C.; Jansen, D.; Boon, J.; Dijkstra, J. W.; van den Brink, R. W.; Verkooijen, A. H. M. Staged water-gas shift configuration: Key to efficiency penalty reduction during precombustion decarbonisation in IGCC Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 661-668
51. Krevelen, D. W. V.; Hoftijzer, P. J.; Huntjens, F. Y. Composition and vapor pressures of aqueous solutions of ammonia, carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-bas 1949, 68, 191-216
52. Edwards, T. J.; Newman, J.; Prausnitz, J. M. Thermodynamics of aquesous solutions containing volatile weak electrolytes AIChE J. 1975, 21, 248-259
53. 2O vapor-liquid equilibria Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1978, 17, 220-230 (Pubitemid 8618661)
54. 2 capture. Gasification Technologies Conference, San Francisco, CA 2007.
55. Ciferno, J.; Newby, R. Carbon Sequestration System Analysis, Technical Note no. 10. May 2006, pp 1 - 10; National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, http://www.netl.doe.gov.
56. 2 with other Impurities for Coal and Heavy Fuel-Fired Power Plant Flue Gases. IEA Green House Gas reports, PH4/32; International Energy Agency, UK, December, 2004.
57. Gross, J.; Sadowski, G. Perturbed-chain SAFT: An equation of state based on a perturbation theory for chain molecules Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 1244-1260 (Pubitemid 32183017)
58. 2 capture process by Selexol; 2008, pp 1 - 22; www.aspentech.com.
59. Xu, Y.; Schutte, R. P.; Hepler, L. G. Solubilities of Carbon Dioxide, Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfur Dioxide in physical solvents Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1992, 70, 569-573
60. 2 constrained environment. Proceedings of the Gasification Technology Conference, San Francisco, CA, Oct 13-14, 2003.
61. Brooks, F. GE gas turbine performance characteristics, GER-3567H; http://www.gepower.com.
62. Todd, D. M. Gas turbine improvements enhance IGCC viability. Gasification Technologies Conference, San Francisco, CA, Oct 8-11, 2000.