Troubling methodology

Health Psychology Review

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 48-54

  Chamberlain, Kerry ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952776461     PISSN: 17437199     EISSN: 17437202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2010.520113     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
2. Brocki, J., & Wearden, A. (2006). A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology & Health, 21, 87-108.
3. Colaizzi, P.E. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R.S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48-71). New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Dowling, M. (2007). From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 131-142.
6. Finlay, L. (2009). Debating phenomenological research methods. Phenomenology & Practice, 3, 6-25.
7. Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Giorgi, A. (1995). Phenomenological psychology. In J.A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 24-42). London: Sage.
9. Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28, 235-260.
10. Kaplan, D.M. (2003). Ricoeur's critical theory. New York: SUNY Press.
11. King, N., Finlay, L., Ashworth, P., Smith, J.A., Langdridge, D., & Butt, T. (2008). "Can't really trust that, so what can I trust?": A polyvocal, qualitative analysis of the psychology of mistrust. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5, 80-102.
12. Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method. Harlow, Essex: Pearson.
13. Norlyk, A., & Harder, I. (2010). What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 420-431.
14. Parker, I. (2005). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
15. Poteete, A., Janssen, M., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Smith, J.A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology & Health, 11, 261-271.
17. Smith, J.A. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis & its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 39-54.
18. Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., & Osborn, M. (1997). Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the psychology of health and illness. In L. Yardley (Ed.), Material discourses of health and illness (pp. 68-91). London: Routledge.
19. Smith, J.A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods (pp. 218-240). London: Sage.
20. Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J.A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53-80). London: Sage.
21. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Thorne, S., Reimer Kirkham, S., & O'Flynn-Magee, K. (2004). The analytic challenge in interpretive description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2004, 3(1), 1-11.
23. van Manen, M. (1997). Researching the lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). ON, Canada: Althouse Press.
24. Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
25. Wilson, H.S., & Hutchinson, S.A. (1996). Methodological mistakes in grounded theory. Nursing Research, 45, 122-124.