Application of a finite-volume method in the simulation of chromatographic systems: Effects of flux limiters

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1739-1748

  Medi, Bijan ^a   Amanullah, Mohammad ^a  

^a Nanyang Technological University   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS; CHROMATOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL TIME; ELUTION PROFILES; FINITE DIFFERENCE; FINITE-VOLUME; FLUX LIMITERS; MODEL EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL SCHEME; SHOCK FRONTS; SIMULATION RESULT; SOLUTION TECHNIQUES; VAN LEER FLUX;

CHROMATOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE VOLUME METHOD;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 79952779371     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie100617c     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Juza, M.; Mazzotti, M.; Morbidelli, M. Simulated Moving-Bed Chromatography and Its Application to Chirotechnology Trends Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 108
2. Seidel-Morgenstern, A.; Kessler, L. C.; Kaspereit, M. New Developments in Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography Chem. Eng. Technol. 2008, 31, 826
3. Golshan-Shirazi, S.; Guiochon, G. Solutions of the Equilibrium and Semi-Equilibrium Models of Chromatography J. Chromatogr. 1990, 506, 495
4. Zhong, G. M.; Guiochon, G. Analytical Solution for the Linear Ideal Model of Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996, 51, 4307
5. Guiochon, G.; Fellinger, A.; Shirazi, D. G.; Katti, A. M. Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography, 2 nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, 2006.
6. Klatt, K. U.; Hanisch, F.; Dunnebier, G.; Engell, S. Model-Based Optimization and Control of Chromatographic Processes Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 1119
7. Amanullah, M.; Grossmann, C.; Mazzotti, M.; Morari, M.; Morbidelli, M. Experimental Implementation of Automatic Cycle to Cycle Control of a Chiral Simulated Moving Bed Separation J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1165, 100
8. Mota, J. P. B.; Araùjo, J. M. M.; Rodrigues, R. C. R. Optimal Design of Simulated Moving-Bed Processes under Flow Rate Uncertainty AlChE J. 2007, 53, 2630
9. Webley, P. A.; He, J. Fast Solution-Adaptive Finite Volume Method for PSA/VSA Cycle Simulation; 1 Single Step Simulation Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 23, 1701
10. Ray, A. K.; Weifang, Y.; Hidajat, K. Optimization of Reactive Simulated Moving Bed and Varicol Systems for Hydrolysis of Methyl Acetate Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 112, 57
11. Amanullah, M.; Abel, S.; Mazzotti, M. Separation of Trogers Base Enantiomers through a Combination of Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography and Crystallization Adsorption 2005, 11, 893
12. Amanullah, M.; Mazzotti, M. Optimization of a Hybrid Chromatography- Crystallization Process for the Separation of Trogers Base Enantiomers J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1107, 36
13. Wenda, C.; Rajendran, A. Enantioseparation of Flurbiprofen on Amylose-Derived Chiral Stationary Phase by Supercritical Fluid Chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 8750
14. Finlayson, B. A. Numerical Methods for Problems with Moving Fronts; Ravenna Park Publishing: Seattle, WA, 1992.
15. Gu, T.; Truei, Y. H.; Tsai, G. J.; Tsao, G. T. Modeling of Gradient Elution in Multicomponent Nonlinear Chromatography Chem. Eng. Sci. 1992, 47, 253
16. Boris, J. P.; Book, D. L. Flux-Corrected Transport. 1. SHASTA, a Fluid Transport Algorithm That Works J. Comput. Phys. 1973, 11, 38
17. van Leer, B. Towards Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme. 2. Monotonicity and Conservation Combined in a Second-Order Scheme J. Comput. Phys. 1974, 14, 361
18. Versteeg, H. K.; Malalasekra, W. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, 2 nd ed.; Pearson Education Limited: Harlow, U.K., 2007.
19. Harten, A. High-Resolution Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws J. Comput. Phys. 1983, 49, 357
20. Sweby, P. K. High Resolution Schemes Using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1984, 21, 995
21. Osher, S.; Chakravarthy, S. High Resolution Schemes and the Entropy Condition SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1984, 21, 955
22. Nessyahu, H.; Tadmor, E. Non-Oscillatory Central Differencing for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws J. Comput. Phys. 1990, 87, 408
23. Kurganov, A.; Tadmor, E. New High-Resolution Central Schemes for Nonlinear Conservation Laws and Convection-Diffusion Equations J. Comput. Phys. 2000, 160, 241
24. LeVeque, R. J. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems; Cambridge University Press: New York, 2002.
25. Kaczmarski, K.; Antos, D. Fast Finite Difference Method for Solving Multicomponent Adsorption-Chromatography Models Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 1271
26. Francotte, E.; Richert, P.; Mazzotti, M.; Morbidelli, M. Simulated Moving Bed Chromatographic Resolution of a Chiral Antitussive J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 796, 239
27. Zabka, M.; Minceva, M.; Gomes, P. S.; Rodrigues, A. E. Chiral Separation of R, S -a-Tetralol by Simulated Moving Bed Sep. Sci. Technol. 2008, 43, 727
28. van Leer, B. Towards Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme. 4. New Approach to Numerical Convection J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23, 276
29. Roe, P. L. Characteristic-Based Schemes for the Euler Equations Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1986, 18, 337
30. Koren, B. A Robust Upwind Discretization Method for Advection, Diffusion and Source Terms. In Numerical Methods for Advection-Diffusion Problems; Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics; Vreugdenhil, C. B.; Koren, B., Eds.; Vieweg & Sohn: Braunschweig, Germany, 1993; Vol. 45, pp 117 - 138.
31. Poulain, C. A.; Finlayson, B. A. Comparison of Numerical Methods Applied to Non-Linear Adsorption Columns Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 1993, 17, 839