Sensory characterisation enabled the first classification of dessert bananas

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 992-1000

  Bugaud, Christophe ^a   Deverge, Emeline ^b   Daribo, Marie Odette ^a   Ribeyre, Fabienne ^c   Fils Lycaon, Bernard ^d   Mbéguié A Mbéguié, Didier ^a  

^a UMR QUALISUD   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^c CIRAD   (France)

^d CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Classification; Cultivar; Hybrid; Musa; Sensory profile analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BANANA; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FRUIT; HARDNESS; HUMAN; MARTINIQUE; NOMENCLATURE; ODOR; PH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; SENSATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TASTE;

FRUIT; HARDNESS; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MARTINIQUE; MUSA; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA; SENSATION; SMELL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TASTE; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

MUSA;

EID: 79952749175     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4270     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Stover RH and Simmonds NW, Bananas. Longman, London (1987).
2. Loeillet D, Le marché international bananier: une gamme de produits très étroite, in Bananas and Food Security, ed. by Picq C, Fouré E and Frison EA. INIBAP, Montpellier, pp. 567-576 (1999).
3. Ortiz R, Ferris RSB and Vuylsteke D, Banana and plantain breeding, in Banana and Plantains, ed. by Gowen S. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 110-146 (1995).
4. Salvador A, Sanz T and Fiszman SM, Changes in colour and texture and their relationship with eating quality during storage of two different dessert bananas. Postharv Biol Technol 43: 319-325 (2007).
5. Cano MP, de Ancos B, Matallana MC, Camara M, Reglero G and Tabera J, Differences among Spanish and Latin-American banana cultivars: morphological, chemical and sensory characteristics. Food Chem 59: 411-419 (1997).
6. Dadzie BK, Post-harvest Characteristics of Black Sigatoka Resistant Banana, Cooking Banana and Plantain Hybrids. International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain, Montpellier (1998).
7. Eyabi G, Samalang P, Ehabe E and Numfor FA, Chemical and organoleptic quality of figs from selected sweet bananas (Musa spp.). J Food Technol Afr 5: 70-72 (2000).
8. Scriven FM, Gek CO and Wills RBH, Sensory differences between bananas ripened without and with ethylene. HortScience 24: 983-984 (1989).
9. Bugaud C, Alter P, Daribo MO and Brillouet JM, Comparison of the physico-chemical characteristics of a new triploid banana hybrid, FLHORBAN 920, and the Cavendish variety. J Sci Food Agric 89: 407-413 (2009).
10. Chillet M, de Lapeyre de Bellaire L, Hubert O and Mbeguie-A-Mbeguie D, Measurement of banana green life. Fruits 63: 125-127 (2008).
11. Bugaud C, Daribo MO, Beauté MP, Telle N and Dubois C, Relative importance of location and period of banana bunch growth in carbohydrate content and mineral composition of fruit. Fruits 64: 63-74 (2009).
12. Bugaud C, Daribo MO and Dubois C, Climatic conditions affect the texture and colour of Cavendish bananas (Grande Naine cultivar). Sci Hort 113: 238-243 (2007).
13. Williams EJ, Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Aust J Sci Res 2: 149-168 (1949).
14. Bugaud C, Chillet A, Beauté MP and Dubois C, Physicochemical analysis of mountain bananas from the French West Indies. Sci Hort 108: 167-172 (2006).
15. Bi J, Agreement and reliability assessments for performance of sensory descriptive panel. J Sens Stud 18: 61-76 (2003).
16. Bianchi G, Zerbini PE and Rizzolo A, Short-term training and assessment for performance of a sensory descriptive panel for the olfactometric analysis of aroma extracts. J Sens Stud 24: 149-165 (2009).
17. Bi J, Sensory Discrimination Tests and Measurements-Statistical Principles, Procedures and Tables. Blackwell, Ames, Iowa, USA (2006).
18. Karlsen AM, Aaby K, Sivertsen H, Baardseth P and Ellekjaer MR, Instrumental and sensory analysis of fresh Norwegian and imported apples. Food Qual Prefer 10: 305-314 (1999).
19. Ahmad S, Thompson AK, Ahmad HI and Asghar AA, Effect of temperature on the ripening behavior and quality of banana fruit. Int J Agric Biol 3: 224-227 (2001).
20. Esti M, Messia MC, Bertocchi P, Sinesio F, Moneta E, Nicotra A, et al, Chemical compounds and sensory assessment of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis (Planch.) var. chinensis): electrochemical and multivariate analyses. Food Chem 61: 293-300 (1998).
21. Esti M, Messia MC, Sinesio F, Nicotra A, Conte L, La Notte E, et al, Quality evaluation of peaches and nectarines by electrochemical and multivariate analyses: relationships between analytical measurements and sensory attributes. Food Chem 60: 659-666 (1997).
22. Stevens MA, Kader AA and Albright M, Potential for increasing tomato flavor via increased sugar and acid content. J Am Soc Hort Sci 104: 40-42 (1979).
23. Colaric M, Veberic R, Stampar F and Hudina M, Evaluation of peach and nectarine fruit quality and correlations between sensory and chemical attributes. J Sci Food Agric 85: 2611-2616 (2005).
24. Bonnans S and Noble AC, Effect of sweetener type and of sweetener and acid levels on temporal perception of sweetness, sourness and fruitiness. Chem Sens 18: 273-283 (1993).
25. Schifferstein HNJ and Frijters JER, Sensory integration in citric acid/sucrose mixtures. Chem Sens 15: 87-109 (1990).
26. Prescott J, Flavour as a psychological construct: implications for perceiving and measuring the sensory qualities of foods. Food Qual Prefer 10: 349-356 (1999).
27. Stevenson RJ, Prescott J and Boakes RA, Confusing tastes and smells: how odours can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes. Chem Sens 24: 627-635 (1999).
28. Barnell HR and Barnell E, Studies in tropical fruits: XVI. The distribution of tannins within the banana and the changes in their condition and amount during ripening. Ann Bot 33: 77-99 (1945).
29. Kyamuhangire W, Krekling T, Reed E and Pehrson R, The microstructure and tannin content of banana fruit and their likely influence on juice extraction. J Sci Food Agric 86: 1908-1915 (2006).