Chance-constrained multi-objective programming for optimal multi-layer aquifer remediation design

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 417-432

  Singh, Thangjam Somch ^a   Chakrabarty, Dibakar ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SILCHAR   (India)

Author keywords

evolutionary algorithms; groundwater; multi objective optimization; numerical models; remedial action

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER REMEDIATION; CHANCE-CONSTRAINED; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; GROUND WATER REMEDIATION; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; NUMERICAL MODELS; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS; PRIMARY OBJECTIVE; RELIABILITY PREDICTION; REMEDIAL ACTIONS; REMEDIATION COSTS; REMEDIATION DESIGN; UNCERTAIN DESIGN PARAMETERS;

AQUIFERS; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; DECISION MAKING; DESIGN; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; NUMERICAL METHODS; POLLUTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 79952748857     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: 10290273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2010.491548     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ahlfeld, D. P., Mulvey, J. M., Pinder, G. F. and Wood, E. F., 1988. Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory: 1. Model development. Water Resources Research, 24, 431-441.
2. Ahlfeld, D. P. and Mulligan, A. E., 2000. Optimal management of flow in groundwater systems. California:Academic Press, 185 pp.
3. Bayer, P. and Finkel, M., 2007. Optimization of concentration control by evolution strategies: Formulation, application, and assessment of remedial solutions. Water Resources Research, 43, 1-19.
4. Chan, N., 1994. Partial infeasibility method for chance-constrained aquifer management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 120, 70-89.
5. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., 1963. Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisfying under chance constraints. Operational Research, 11, 18-39.
6. Culver, T. B. and Shenk, G. W., 1998. Dynamic optimal groundwater remediation by granular activated carbon. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127, 316-323.
7. Culver, T. B. and Shoemaker, C. A., 1992. Dynamic optimal control for groundwater remediation with flexible management periods. Water Resources Research, 28, 629-641.
8. Deb, K., 2001. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
9. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. and Meyarivan, T., 2002. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions of Evolutionary Computations, 6, 182-197. (Pubitemid 34555372)
10. Dougherty, D. E. and Marryott, R. A., 1991. Optimal groundwater management: 1. Simulated annealing. Water Resources Research, 27, 2497-2508.
11. Erickson, M., Mayer, A. and Horn, J., 2002. Multi-objective optimal design of groundwater remediation systems: application of the niched Pareto genetic algorithm (NPGA). Advances in Water Resources, 25, 51-65. (Pubitemid 34068217)
12. Haggerty, R. and Gorelick, S. M., 1994. Design of multiple contaminant remediation: Sensitivity to rate-limited mass transfer. Water Resources Research, 30, 435-446.
13. Harbaugh, A. W. Banta, E. R. Hill, M. C., and McDonald, M. G. 2000. User's documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U. S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flow model. U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report 00-92.
14. Hsiao, C.-T. and Chang, L.-C., 2002. Dynamic optimal groundwater management with inclusion of fixed costs. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 128, 57-65. (Pubitemid 34099432)
15. Huang, C. and Mayer, A. S., 1997. Pump-and-treat optimization using well locations and pumping rates as decision variables. Water Resources Research, 33, 1001-1012.
16. Karatzas, G. P. and Pinder, G. F., 1996. The solution of groundwater quality management problems with nonconvex feasible region using a cutting plane optimization technique. Water Resources Research, 32, 1091-1100. (Pubitemid 26309846)
17. rd edn. [online]. Available from: http://orsc.edu.cn/liu/up.pdf [Accessed 21 October 2009].
18. McKinney, D. C. and Lin, M.-D., 1994. Genetic algorithms solution of groundwater management models. Water Resources Research, 30, 1897-1906. (Pubitemid 283608)
19. McKinney, D. C. and Lin, M.-D., 1996. Pump-and-treat ground-water remediation system optimization. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 122, 128-136.
20. Morgan, D. R., Eheart, J. W. and Valocchi, A. J., 1993. Aquifer remediation design under uncertainty using a new chance constrained programming technique. Water Resources Research, 29, 551-561. (Pubitemid 23382835)
21. Prom-on, P. and Kheawhom, S., 2006. Paper title. Technology and innovation development conference (TISD2006), 25-26 January, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Guidelines for selection of Genetic Parameters in Multi-objective Problems, Bangkok, 33-37.
22. Ren, X. and Minsker, B., 2005. Which groundwater remediation objective is better: A realistic one or a simple one? Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 131, 351-361.
23. Sawyer, C. S. and Lin, Y., 1998. Mixed-integer chance-constrained models for groundwater remediation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 124, 285-294. (Pubitemid 28555931)
24. Singh, A. and Minsker, B., 2008. Uncertainty-based multiobjective optimization of groundwater remediation design. Water Resources Research, 44, 1-20.
25. Smalley, J. B., Minsker, B. S. and Goldberg, D. E., 2000. Risk-based in situ bioremediation design. Water Resources Research, 36, 3043-3052.
26. Wagner, B. J., 1999. Evaluating data worth for groundwater management under uncertainty. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 125, 281-288.
27. Wagner, B. J. and Gorelick, S. M., 1987. Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty. Water Resources Research, 23, 1162-1174.
28. Wang, M. and Zheng, C., 1997. Optimal remediation policy selection under general condition. Ground Water, 35, 757-764. (Pubitemid 127493084)
29. Zheng, C. and Wang, 1999. MT3DMS:A modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion, and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems. Report to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Contract Report SERDP-99-1, December 1999.
30. Zheng, C. and Wang, P. P., 2002. A field demonstration of the simulation optimization approach for remediation system design. Ground Water, 40, 258-265. (Pubitemid 34494853)