Pump-and-treat optimization using well locations and pumping rates as decision variables

Water Resources Research

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 1001-1012

  Huang, Changlin ^a   Mayer, Alex S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Michigan Technological University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; LOCATION; OPTIMIZATION; POROUS MATERIALS;

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS; CONVERGENCE BEHAVIORS; COST-EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS; GROUND WATER REMEDIATION; HETEROGENEOUS POROUS MEDIA; LINEAR OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; NONLINEAR FORMULATION; OPTIMIZATION FORMULATIONS;

PUMPS;

AQUIFERS; GROUNDWATER; POROUS MEDIA; REMEDIATION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION; MODEL; PUMP AND TREAT; PUMPING RATE; REMEDIATION; WELL LOCATION;

EID: 0030816075     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/97WR00366     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ahlfeld, D. P., Two-stage groundwater remediation design, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 116(4), 517-529, 1990.
2. Ahlfeld, D. P., and C. S. Sawyer, Well location in capture zone design using simulation and optimization techniques, Ground Water, 28(4), 507-512, 1990.
3. Bear, J., Hydraulics of Groundwater, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.
4. Chang, L. C., C. A. Shoemaker, and P. L.-F. Liu, Optimal time-varying pumping rates for groundwater remediation: Application of a constrained optimal control algorithm, Water Resour. Res., 28(12), 3157-3174, 1992.
5. Culver, T., and C. A. Shoemaker, Dynamic optimal control for groundwater remediation with flexible management periods, Water Resour. Res., 28(3), 629-641, 1992.
6. Davis, M. W., Production of conditional simulation via the LU triangular decomposition of the co-variance matrix, Math. Geol., 19(2), 91-98, 1987.
7. DeJong, K. A., An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Mich., Ann Arbor, 1975.
8. Dougherty, D. E., and R. Marryott, Optimal groundwater management, 1, Simulated annealing, Water Resour. Res., 27(10), 2493-2508, 1991.
9. Goldberg, D. E., Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1989.
10. Gorelick, S. M., A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods, Water Resour. Res., 19(2), 305-319, 1983.
11. Gorelick, S. M., C. I. Voss, P. E. Gill, W. Murray, M. A. Saunders, and M. H. Wright, Aquifer reclamation design: The use of contaminant transport simulation combined with nonlinear programming, Water Resour. Res., 20(4), 415-427, 1984.
12. Hoffman, F., Ground-water remediation using "Smart Pump and Treat," Ground Water, 31(1), 98-106, 1993.
13. Huang, C., and A. S. Mayer, Dynamic optimal control for groundwater remediation management using genetic algorithms, in Models for Assessing and Monitoring Groundwater Quality, IAHS Publ. 227, 1995.
14. Karatzas, G. P., and G. F. Pinder, Cost minimization of groundwater contamination remediation at U.S. Air Force Plant 44, Eos Trans. AGU, 76(46), Fall Meet. Suppl., 1995.
15. Karatzas, G. P., and G. F. Pinder, The solution of groundwater quality management problems with a nonconvex feasible region using a cutting plane technique, Water Resour. Res., 32(4), 1091-1100, 1996.
16. Marryott, R. A., and D. E. Dougherty, Optimal groundwater management, 2, Application of simulated annealing to a field-scale contamination site, Water Resour. Res., 29(4), 847-860, 1993.
17. McDonald, M. G., and A. W. Harbaugh, A modular three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model, Chap. A1, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep. 83-875, 1983.
18. McKinney, D. C., and M. Lin, Genetic algorithms solution of groundwater management models, Water Resour. Res., 30(6), 1897-1906, 1994.
19. McKinney, D. C., G. B. Gates, and M. Lin, Groundwater resource management models: A comparison of genetic algorithms and non-linear programming, in Computational Methods in Water Resources X, vol. 2, pp. 859-866, Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., 1994.
20. Rabideau, A. J., and C. T. Miller, Two-dimensional modeling of aquifer remediation influenced by sorption non-equilibrium and hydraulic conductivity heterogeneity, Water Resour. Res., 30(5), 1457-1470, 1994.
21. Ritzel, B. J., J. W. Eheart, and S. Ranjithan, Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem, Water Resour. Res., 30(5), 1589-1604, 1994.
22. Rogers, L. L., and F. U. Dowla, Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel transport modeling, Water Resour. Res., 30(2), 457-482, 1994.
23. Wagner, B. J., Recent advances in simulation-optimization groundwater management modeling, Rev. Geophys., Supplement, U.S. Natl. Rep. Int. Union Geod. Geophys., 1991-1994, Rev. Geophys., 33, 1021-1028, 1995.
24. Wang, W., and D. P. Ahlfeld, Optimal groundwater remediation with well location as a decision variable: Model development, Water Resour. Res., 30(5), 1605-1618, 1994.
25. Zheng, C., MT3D: A modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems, R. S. Kerr Environ. Res. Lab., U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, Ada, Okla., 1990.