Magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid stent patency

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 261-263

  Rizzo, Julie A ^a   Dodge, Angela ^a   White, Paul ^a   Martin, Eric D ^a  

^a EISENHOWER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

carotid stent; imaging; magnetic resonance angiography

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR;

AGED; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ARTERY LESION; ARTICLE; BLURRED VISION; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CASE REPORT; DEVICE THERAPY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; GAIT DISORDER; HUMAN; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NAUSEA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; VASCULAR PATENCY;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY; CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL; CAROTID STENOSIS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 79952745037     PISSN: 15310035     EISSN: 15310027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1531003511400428     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Veith FJ, Amor M., Ohki T., et al. Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders. J Vasc Surg. 2001 ; 33 (2suppl). S111 - S116.
2. Cumbie T., Rosero EB, Valentine RJ, Modrall JG, Clagett GP, Timaran CH Utility and accuracy of duplex ultrasonography in evaluating in-stent restenosis after carotid stenting. Am J Surg. 2008 ; 196: 623-628.
3. Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, Mail WP, Eikelboom BC, Kappelle LJ, von der Graaf Y. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Surg. 2002 ; 36: 806-813. (Pubitemid 41122980)
4. Back MR, Wilson JS, Rushing G., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotic endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2000 ; 32: 429-440.
5. Patel MR, Kuntz KM, Klufas RA, Kim D., Kramer J., Polak JF Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography ? Stroke. 1995 ; 26: 1753-1758.
6. Buecker A., Spuentrup E., Ruebben A., Gunther RW Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent. Circulation. 2002 ; 105: 1772-1775. (Pubitemid 34408884)
7. Lenhart M., Volk M., Manke C., et al. Stent Appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents. Radiology. 2000 ; 217: 173-178. (Pubitemid 33097598)
8. Maintz D., Kugel H., Schellhammer F. In vitro evaluation of intra-vascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography. Invest Radiol. 2001 ; 36: 218-224. (Pubitemid 32295624)
9. Meyer JM, Buecker A., Schuermann K. MR evaluation of stent patency: in vitro test of 22 metallic stents and the possibility of determining their patency by MR angiography. Invest Radiol. 2000 ; 35: 739-746. (Pubitemid 32039037)
10. Liu H., Martin AJ, Truwit CL Interventional MRI at high-field (1.5 T): needle artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998 ; 8: 214-219. (Pubitemid 28099581)
11. Kwon BJ, Jung C., Sheen SH, Cho JH, Han MH CT angiography of stented carotid arteries: comparison with Doppler ultrasonography. J Endovasc Ther. 2007 ; 14: 489-497. (Pubitemid 350154995)