The effect of study design biases on the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting silicone breast implant ruptures: A meta-analysis

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 127, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1029-1044

  Song, Jae W ^a,b   Kim, Hyungjin Myra ^a,b   Bellfi, Lillian T ^a,b   Chung, Kevin C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILASTIC;

BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; RUPTURE;

BREAST IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; RUPTURE, SPONTANEOUS; SILICONE ELASTOMERS;

EID: 79952743613     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182043630     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Spiera H. Scleroderma after silicone augmentation mammoplasty. JAMA. 1988;260:236-238.
2. Silverstein MJ, Gierson ED, Gamagami P, Handel N, Waisman JR. Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in women augmented with silicone gel-filled implants. Cancer 1990;66:97-101. (Pubitemid 20197091)
3. Sanger JR, Matloub HS, Yousif NJ, Komorowski R. Silicone gel infiltration of a peripheral nerve and constrictive neuropathy following rupture of abreast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:949-952.
4. Hilts PJ. F. D. A. seeks halt in breast implants made of silicone. New York Times. January 7, 1992. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/1992/01/07/ science/fda-seeks-halt-in-breast-implantsmade-of-silicone.html?scp=1&sq=F. DA.%20Seeks%20Halt% 20in%20Breast%20Implants%20Made%20of%20Silicone& st=cse&pagewanted=2. Accessed May 10, 2010.
5. McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Murphy DK, Walker PS. The safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants: A review of the epidemiologic evidence. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:569-580. (Pubitemid 351339086)
6. U. S. Food and Drug Administration. 2006 guidance for industry and FDA on saline, silicone gel, and alternative breast implants: 8.5 safety assessment-rupture. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/ SpecialTopics/WomensHealth Research/ucm133361.htm#85. Accessed May 3, 2010.
7. Terry MB, Skovron ML, Garbers S, Sonnenschein E, Toniolo P. The estimated frequency of cosmetic breast augmentation among US women, 1963 through 1988. Am J Public Health 1995;85:1122-1124.
8. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2010 Report of the 2009 statistics: National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Statistics. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Media/Statistics.html. Accessed May 3, 2010.
9. Silicone gel-filled breast implants approved. FDA Consum. 2007;41:8-9.
10. Brown SL, Silverman BG, Berg WA. Rupture of silicone-gel breastimplants: Causes, sequelae, and diagnosis. Lancet 1997;350:1531-1537. (Pubitemid 28036566)
11. Heden P, Nava MB, van Tetering JP, et al. Prevalence of rupture in Inamed silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:303-308; discussion 309-312. (Pubitemid 44162028)
12. Adams WP, Potter JK. Breast implants: Materials and manufacturing past, present, and future. In: Spear SL, ed. Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:424-437.
13. Cronin AM, Vickers AJ. Statistical methods to correct for verification bias in diagnostic studies are inadequate when there are few false negatives: A simulation study. BMCMedRes Methodol. 2008;8:75.
14. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1999;282:1061-1066. (Pubitemid 29436454)
15. Singer N. Implants are back, and so is debate. New York Times. May 24, 2007. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/24/fashion/24skin.html?-r=1. Accessed May 3, 2010.
16. Chung KC, Greenfield ML, Walters M. Decision-analysis methodology in the work-up of women with suspected silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:689-695. (Pubitemid 28402610)
17. Chung KC, Burns PB, Kim HM. A practical guide to metaanalysis. J Hand Surg (Am.) 2006;31:1671-1678.
18. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins J P T, et al. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley; 2009:1-406.
19. Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. Vol. 2. London: BMJ; 2001:248-282.
20. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283:2008-2012. (Pubitemid 30214957)
21. Reitsma H, Rutjes A, Whiting P, et al. Assessing methodological quality. In: Deeks J, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Version 1.0.0. Oxford, United Kingdom: Cochrane Collaboration; 2009:1-27. Available at: http://srdta.cochrane.org/. Accessed May 10, 2010.
22. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25.
23. Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:9.
24. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. BMJ. 2003;326:41-44. (Pubitemid 36110721)
25. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:W1-W12.
26. Bruce N, Pope D, Stanistreet D. Quantitative Methods for Health Research: A Practical Interactive Guide to Epidemiology and Statistics. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley; 2008:1-529.
27. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM. The diagnostic odds ratio: A single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1129-1135. (Pubitemid 37386338)
28. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629-634. (Pubitemid 27387172)
29. Ahn CY, De Bruhl ND, Gorczyca DP, Shaw WW, Bassett LW. Comparative silicone breast implant evaluation using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: Experience with 59 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94:620-627. (Pubitemid 24314060)
30. Beekman WH, Hage JJ, Taets van Amerongen AH, Mulder JW. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting failure of breast implants filled with silicone gel. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999;33:415-418.
31. Berg WA, Caskey CI, Hamper UM, et al. Single-lumen and double-lumen silicone breast implant integrity: Prospective evaluation of MR and US criteria. Radiology 1995;197:45-52.
32. Di Benedetto G, Cecchini S, Grassetti L, et al. Comparative study of breast implant rupture using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: Correlation with surgical findings. Breast J. 2008;14:532-537.
33. Everson LI, Parantainen H, Detlie T, et al. Diagnosis of breast implant rupture: Imaging findings and relative efficacies of imaging techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:57-60. (Pubitemid 24225686)
34. Ikeda DM, Borofsky HB, Herfkens RJ, Sawyer-Glover AM, Birdwell RL, Glover GH. Silicone breast implant rupture: Pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:2054-2062.
35. Scaranelo AM, Marques AF, Smialowski EB, Lederman HM. Evaluation of the rupture of silicone breast implantsby mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic patients: Correlation with surgical findings. Sao Paulo Med J. 2004;122:41-47. (Pubitemid 38779898)
36. Reynolds HE, Buckwalter KA, Jackson VP, Siwy BK, Alexander SG. Comparison of mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of silicone-gel breast implant rupture. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;33:247-255; discussion 256-257.
37. Caskey CI, Berg WA, Anderson ND, Sheth S, Chang BW, Hamper UM. Breast implant rupture: Diagnosis with US. Radiology 1994;190:819-823. (Pubitemid 24071053)
38. Chung KC, Wilkins EG, Beil RJ Jr, et al. Diagnosis of silicone gel breast implant rupture by ultrasonography. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:104-109. (Pubitemid 26012646)
39. De Bruhl ND, Gorczyca DP, Ahn CY, Shaw WW, Bassett LW. Silicone breast implants: US evaluation. Radiology 1993;189:95-98. (Pubitemid 23292929)
40. Venta LA, Salomon CG, Flisak ME, Venta ER, Izquierdo R, Angelats J. Sonographic signs of breast implant rupture. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1413-1419. (Pubitemid 26160598)
41. Medot M, Landis GH, McGregor CE, et al. Effects of capsular contracture on ultrasonic screening for silicone gel breast implant rupture. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;39:337-341. (Pubitemid 27433255)
42. Collis N, Litherland J, Enion D, Sharpe DT. Magnetic resonance imaging and explantation investigation of long-term silicone gel implant integrity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1401-1406. (Pubitemid 47493971)
43. Frankel S, Occhipinti K, Kaufman L, et al. MRI findings in subjects with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:852-859.
44. Gorczyca DP, Schneider E, De Bruhl ND, et al. Silicone breast implant rupture: Comparison between three-point Dixon and fast spin-echo MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:305-310. (Pubitemid 24065425)
45. Gorczyca DP, Sinha S, Ahn CY, et al. Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:407-410.
46. Herborn CU, Marincek B, Erfmann D, et al. Breast augmentation and reconstructive surgery: MR imaging of implant rupture and malignancy. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2198-2206. (Pubitemid 36940313)
47. Hölmich LR, Vejborg I, Conrad C, Sletting S, McLaughlin JK. The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explantation. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53:213-225. (Pubitemid 40143583)
48. Monticciolo DL, Nelson RC, Dixon WT, Bostwick J III, Mukundan S, Hester TR. MR detection of leakage from silicone breast implants: Value of a silicone-selective pulse sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:51-56. (Pubitemid 24225685)
49. Quinn SF, Neubauer NM, Sheley RC, Demlow TA, Szumowski J. MR imaging of silicone breast implants: Evaluation of prospective and retrospective interpretations and interobserver agreement. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:213-218. (Pubitemid 126702467)
50. Cole P, Morrison AS. Basic issues in population screening for cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980;64:1263-1272. (Pubitemid 10100344)
51. Walsh JM, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening: Clinical applications. JAMA. 2003;289:1297-1302. (Pubitemid 37432911)
52. Dominitz JA, Provenzale D. Patient preferences and quality of life associated with colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:2171-2178.
53. Nelson RL, Schwartz A. A survey of individual preference for colorectal cancer screening technique. BMC Cancer 2004;4:76.
54. Flood AB, Wennberg JE, Nease RF Jr, Fowler FJ Jr, Ding J, Hynes LM. The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer: Prostate patient outcomes research team. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:342-349. (Pubitemid 26230756)
55. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M. Systematic reviews of observational studies. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. Vol. 2. London: BMJ; 2001:211-227.
56. Song F, Khan KS, Dinnes J, Sutton AJ. Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:88-95. (Pubitemid 34284907)