A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 127, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1300-1310

  Codner, Mark A ^a,b   Mejia, Juan D ^a,b   Locke, Michelle B ^a,b   Mahoney, Amy ^a,b   Thiels, Cornelius ^a,b   Nahai, Farzad R ^a,b   Hester, T Roderick ^a,b   Nahai, Foad ^a,b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Paces Plastic Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; METHODOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROGNOSIS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BREAST IMPLANTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GEORGIA; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAMMAPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SILICONES; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952740418     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318205f41b     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:440-444.
2. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Statistics. 2009 Report of the 2008 Statistics. Arlington Heights, Ill: American Society of Plastic Surgeons; 2009.
3. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Statistics. 2000/2006/2007 National Plastic Surgery Statistics. Arlington Heights, Ill: American Society of Plastic Surgeons; 2008.
4. Reece EM, Ghavami A, Hoxworth RE, et al. Primary breast augmentation today: A survey of current breast augmentation practice patterns. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29:116-121.
5. Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS; Inamed Silicone Breast Implant U. S. Study Group. Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:8S-16S; discussion 17S-18S. (Pubitemid 350306652)
6. Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA. A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:757-767; discussion 768-772. (Pubitemid 44324505)
7. Cunningham B. The Mentor Study on Contour Profile Gel Silicone MemoryGel Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:33S-39S. (Pubitemid 350306656)
8. Allen S. FDA Breast Implant Consumer Handbook-2004. Washington, DC; U. S. Food and Drug Administration; 2004.
9. Alpert BS, Lalonde DH. MOC-PS (SM) CME article: Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1-7.
10. Stevens WG, Pacella SJ, Gear AJ, et al. Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: A review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28:642-647.
11. Adams WP Jr. Capsular contracture: What is it? What causes it? How can it be prevented and managed? Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:119-126.
12. Rohrich RJ. Silicone breast implants: Outcomes and safety update. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1S-3S. (Pubitemid 350306650)
13. Adams WP Jr, Teitelbaum S, Bengtson BP, Jewell ML, Tebbetts J, Spear S. Breast augmentation roundtable. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:175S-187S. (Pubitemid 44747141)
14. Spear SL. Redefining reoperations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1279-1280.
15. Tebbetts JB. Reoperations as a benchmark: The rhetoric, the logic, and the patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:662-665.
16. Tebbetts JB. "Out points" criteria for breast implant removal without replacement and criteria to minimize reoperations following breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1258-1262. (Pubitemid 40362055)
17. Pollock H, Pollock T. Is reoperation rate a valid statistic in cosmetic surgery? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:569. (Pubitemid 47067517)
18. Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1255-1272. (Pubitemid 32280484)
19. Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types (Updated Discussion). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:99S-102S.
20. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-481.
21. McCafferty LR, Casas LA, Stinnett SS, Lin S, Rho J, Skiles M. Multisite analysis of 177 consecutive primary breast augmentations: Predictors for reoperation. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29:213-220.
22. Young VL, Watson ME. Breast implant research: Where we have been, where we are, where we need to go. Clin Plast Surg. 2001;28:451-483. (Pubitemid 32646174)
23. Burkhardt BR, Dempsey PD, Schnur PL, Tofield JJ. Capsular contracture: A prospective study of the effect of local antibacterial agents. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77:919-932.
24. Danino AM, Basmacioglu P, Saito S, et al. Comparison of the capsular response to the Biocell RTV and Mentor 1600 Siltex breast implant surface texturing: A scanning electron microscopic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:2047-2052. (Pubitemid 34000849)
25. Burkhardt BR, Demas CP. The effect of Siltex texturing and povidone-iodine irrigation on capsular contracture around saline inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:123-128; discussion 129-130.
26. Wong CH, Samuel M, Tan BK, Song C. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1224-1236. (Pubitemid 44511423)
27. Bengtson BP. Complications, reoperations, and revisions in breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:139-156.
28. Nahabedian MY, Patel K. Management of common and uncommon problems after primary breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:127-138.
29. Haeck P, Glasberg SB, Roth MZ, Schneider-Redden PR. The saline versus silicone breast implant debate: Separating fact from opinion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1847-1849. (Pubitemid 351642749)
30. Spear SL, Bulan EJ, Venturi ML. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:73E-81E.
31. Adams WP Jr. The process of breast augmentation: Four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1892-1900.