Primary Breast Augmentation Today: A Survey of Current Breast Augmentation Practice Patterns

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 116-121

  Reece, Edward M ^a   Ghavami, Ashkan ^a   Hoxworth, Ronald E ^a   Alvarez, Sergio A ^a   Hatef, Daniel A ^a   Brown, Spencer ^a   Rohrich, Rod J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILICONE GEL; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INCISION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NIPPLE; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGEON;

BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; OUTPATIENT CLINICS, HOSPITAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SILICONE GELS; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

EID: 64049086126     PISSN: 1090820X     EISSN: 1527330X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Saline-filled breast implant surgery: making an informed decision (2004), Mentor Corporation, Santa Barbara, CA
2. Gutowski K.A., Mesna G.T., and Cunningham B.L. Saline-filled breast implants: a Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation multicenter outcomes study. Plast Reconstr Surg 100 (1997) 1019-1027
3. Cunningham B.L., Lokeh A., and Gutowski K.A. Saline-filled breast implant safety and efficacy: a multicenter retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg 105 (2000) 2143-2149
4. America Society of Plastic Surgeons Web site. Breast implant survey results, 2007. (Accessed 1/22/2009, at www.plasticsugery.org/medical_professionals/publications/members/psn0607/survey-reveals-acceptance-of-silicone-implants.cfm)
5. Macadam S.A., Kennedy S., Lalonde D., Anzarut A., Clarke H.M., and Brown E.E. The Canadian plastic surgery workforce survey: interpretation and implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 119 (2007) 2299-2306
6. Tebbetts J.B. Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 109 (2002) 293-305
7. Tebbetts J.B. Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 118 7 Suppl (2006) 115S-127S
8. Tebbetts J.B. Achieving a zero percent reoperation rate at 3 years in a 50-consecutive-case augmentation mammaplasty premarket approval study. Plast Reconstr Surg 118 (2006) 1453-1457
9. Hedén P., Boné B., Murphy D.K., Slicton A., and Walker P.S. Style 410 cohesive silicone breast implants: safety and effectiveness at 5 to 9 years after implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 118 (2006) 1281-1287
10. The large simple trial (LST) [package insert] (2002), Inamed Corporation, Irving, CA