Formative assessment in EFL writing: An exploratory case study

Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 99-111

  Lee, Icy ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

EFL writing; Formative assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952719874     PISSN: 1358684X     EISSN: 14693585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1358684X.2011.543516     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Assessment Reform Group. 2002. Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bitchener, J., and U. Knoch. 2009. The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal 63: 204-11.
3. Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2003. Assessment for Learning: Putting it into Practice. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
4. Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5: 7-74.
5. Black, P., and D. Wiliam, D. 2006. Assessment for learning in the classroom. In Assessment and Learning, ed. J. Gardner, 9-25. London: Sage.
6. Carless, D. 2007. Conceptualizing pre-emptive formative assessment. Assessment in Education 14: 171-84.
7. Carless, D., G. Joughin, N.F. Liu, and Associates. 2006. How Assessment Supports Learning: Learning-oriented Assessment in Action. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
8. Clarke, S. 2005. Formative Assessment in Action: Weaving the Elements Together. London: Hodder Murray.
9. Ferris, D.R. 2003. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
10. Gielen, S., F. Dochy, and S. Dierick. 2003. Evaluating the consequential validity of new modes of assessment: The influence of assessment on learning, including pre-, post-and true assessment effects. In Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, ed. M. Segers, F. Dochy, and E. Cascallar, 37-54. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
11. Gipps, C. 1998. Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. In Review of Research in Education, vol. 23, ed. P.D. Pearson and A. Iran-Nehad, 335-93. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
12. Hamp-Lyons, L. 2006. The impact of testing practices on teaching: Ideologies and alternatives. In International Handbook of English Language Teaching, vol. 1, ed. J. Cummins and C. Davison, 487-504. Norwell, MA: Springer.
13. Harlen, W. 2006. The role of assessment in developing motivation for learning. In Assessment and Learning, ed. J. Gardner, 61-80. London: Sage.
14. Lee, I. 2007. Feedback in L2 writing: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning? Assessing Writing 12, no. 3: 180-98.
15. Murphy, S., and K.B. Yancey. 2008. Construct and consequence: Validity in writing assessment. In Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text, ed. C. Bazerman, 365-85. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Nicol, D.J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31: 199-218.
17. Stake, R. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.