Ground-shaking scenarios and urban risk evaluation of Barcelona using the Risk-UE capacity spectrum based method

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 441-466

  Irizarry, J ^a   Lantada, N ^b   Pujades, L G ^b   Barbat, A H ^b   Goula, X ^a   Susagna, T ^a   Roca, A ^a  

^a Institut Geologic de Catalunya   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Capacity spectrum; Demand spectrum; GIS; Urban seismic risk evaluation

Indexed keywords

BARCELONA; BARCELONA , SPAIN; CAPACITY SPECTRUM; DAMAGE STATE; DEMAND SPECTRUM; EUROPEAN PROJECT; GIS; GROUND-SHAKING; SEISMIC RISK; SPECTRAL VALUE; URBAN RISK;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RELIGIOUS BUILDINGS; SEISMOLOGY;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; GIS; GROUND MOTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHAKING TABLE TEST; SPECTRUM; URBAN AREA; VULNERABILITY;

BARCELONA [CATALONIA]; CATALONIA; SPAIN;

EID: 79952695205     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-010-9222-6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25: 375-400.
2. Ambraseys NN, Smit P, Berardi R, Rinaldis D, Cotton F, Berge-Thierry C (2000) Dissemination of European strong-motion data. CD-ROM collection. European Council, Environment and Climate Research Programme.
3. ATC-13 (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, ATC-13. Applied Technology Council, 497 Redwook City, California.
4. ATC-40 (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Applied Technology Council, Redwook City.
5. Barbat AH, Pujades LG, Lantada N, Moreno R (2006) Performance of buildings under earthquake in Barcelona, Spain. Computer-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 21(8): 573-593. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8667. 2010. 00660. x.
6. Barbat AH, Pujades LG, Lantada N, Moreno R (2008) Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using a capacity spectrum based method: application to Barcelona. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, special issue Urban earthquake hazard and damage assessment 28(10-11): 851-865. doi: 10. 1016/j. soildyn. 2009. 12. 014.
7. Barbat AH, Carreño ML, Pujades LG, Lantada N, Cardona OD, Marulanda MC (2010) Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban areas. A review with application to a pilot area. Struct Infrastruct Eng 6(1-2): 17-38. doi: 10. 1080/15732470802663763.
8. Boletín Económico de la Construcción (2007) Revista trimestral de precios del ramo de la construcción. Año LXVIII, trimestre 4. No. 272.
9. Bonett RL (2003) Vulnerabilidad y riesgo sísmico de edificios. Aplicación a entornos urbanos en zonas de amenaza alta y moderada. Ph. D Thesis. Departamento de Ingeniería del Terreno, Cartográfica y Geofísica, Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona.
10. Carreño ML, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2007) Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach. Nat Hazards 40: 137-172.
11. CEN (2003) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Doc CEN/TC250/SC8/N335, January.
12. Cid J, Susagna T, Goula X, Chavarria L, Figueras S, Fleta J, Casas A, Roca A (2001) Seismic zonation of Barcelona based on numerical simulation of site effects. Pure Appl Geophys 158: 1-19.
13. Coburn A, Spence R (2002) Earthquake protection, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester.
14. Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58: 1583-1606.
15. Dufumier H (2002) Synthesis of magnitude and focal mechanism computations for the M ≥ 4. 5 earthquakes in France for the period 1995-2000. J Seismol 6: 163-181.
16. Faccioli E (2006) Seismic hazard assessment for derivation of earhquake scenarios in Risk-UE. Bull Earthq Eng 4: 341-364.
17. Fajfar P, Gaspersic P (1996) The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25: 23-67.
18. Fajfar P (2000) A non linear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16(3): 573-5924.
19. Fajfar P (2002) Structural analysis in earthquake engineering-a breakthrough of simplified non-linear methods. 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, London.
20. FEMA/NIBS (2002) Earthquake loss estimation methodology, HAZUS-99 service release 2 (SR2) technical 533 manual. National Institute of Building Sciences for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Washington, DC, p 534.
21. Freeman SA (1978) Prediction of response of concrete buildings to severe earthquake motion. In: Proceedings of Douglas McHenry international symposium on concrete and concrete structures, publication SP-55. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
22. Freeman SA (1998) The capacity spectrum method. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on earthquake engineering, Paris.
23. González M (2000) Simulación post evento de los efectos de un terremoto. Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya, Informe No. GS-128/00, p 241.
24. Goula X, Godefroy P (1985) Évaluation de l'alea simique regional. Zonage à petite échelle, Génie Parasismique, pp 207-221.
25. Grellet B, Combes PH, Garnier TH, Phillip H (1993) Sismotectonique de la France Métropolitane. Mémories de la Sociéte Géologique de France, No 164, vol I. p 76.
26. Grünthal G (1998) European macroseismic scale 1998. Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxemburg.
27. HAZUS (1999) Earthquake loss estimation methodology technical manual, prepared by the National Institute of Building Sciences for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, DC.
28. Irizarry J (2004) An advanced approach to seismic risk assessment. Application to the cultural heritage and the urban system of Barcelona, PhD Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain, p 406.
29. Lantada N, Pujades LG, Barbat AH (2009) Vulnerability index and capacity spectrum based methods for urban seismic risk evaluation. A comparison. Nat Hazards 51(3): 501-524. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-007-9212-4.
30. Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S (2006) Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng, special issue: earthquake scenarios for European cities 4(4): 415-443.
31. McGuire R (1976) EQRISK. Evaluation of earthquake risk to site. Fortran computer program for seismic risk analysis. US Geolog Surv Open File Rep 76-67: 92.
32. Milutinovic ZV, Trendafiloski GS (2003) WP04 Vulnerability of current buildings. RISK-UE project of the EC: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns.
33. Moreno R, Bairán JM, Pujades LG, Aparicio AC, Barbat AH (2004) Evaluación probabilista del comportamiento sísmico de edificios porticados de hormigón armado. Hormigón y acero 231: 125-136.
34. Mouroux P, Lebrun B (2006) RISK-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with application to different European towns. In: Oliveira CS, Roca A, Goula X (eds) Assessing and managing earthquake risk. Springer, Berlin, pp 479-508.
35. Mouroux P, Lebrun B (2006) Presentation of RISK-UE Project. Bull Earthq Eng, special issue: earthquake scenarios for European cities 4(4): 323-339.
36. NCSE-02 (2002) Normativa de Construcción Sismorresistente Española, Comisión Permanente de Normas Sismorresistentes, Real Decreto 997/2002. Boletín Oficial del Estado No. 244 del 11 de octubre de 2002.
37. Earthquake spectra and design. Engineering monographs on earthquake criteria, structural design, and strong motion records, vol 3. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA. 8/5.
38. Ordaz M, Aguilar A, Arboleda J (1999) Program for computing seismic hazard, CRISIS 99-18. UNAM, México.
39. Perkins JB, Harrald J, Jeong D, Chuaqui B (1996) Shaken awake estimates of uninhabitable dwelling units and peak shelter populations in future earthquakes affecting the San Francisco Bay Region. Association of Bay Area Governments, Oakland.
40. PGS-1 (1968) Norma Sismorresistente P. G. S.-1(1968), parte A, Comisión Interministerial de la Presidencia del Gobierno, Decreto 106/1968, del 16 de enero de 1969.
41. Schnabel B, Lysmer J, Seed, HB (1972) Shake. A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. College of Engineering, University of California, Berkely. Report No EERC 72-12, p 88.
42. Secanell R, Goula X, Susagna T, Fleta J, Roca A (1998) Analysis of seismic hazard in Catalonia (Spain) through different probabilistic approaches. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on earthquake engineering, Ed. Balkema. Paris, France.
43. Secanell R, Goula X, Susagna T, Fleta J, Roca A (2004) Seismic hazard zonation of Catalonia, Spain, integrating uncertainties. J Seismol 8: 24-40.
44. Susagna T, Goula X (1999) Catàleg de Sismicitat. Atlas sísmic de catalunya. Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya, Barcelona, vol 1, 436 pp.
45. Vacareanu R, Lungu D, Aldea A, Arion C (2004) WP7 report seismic risk scenarios handbook. RISK-UE project of the EC: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns.
46. Vielma JC, Barbat AH, Oller S (2008) Comportamiento sísmico de edificios de hormigón armado de ductilidad limitada. Hormigón y acero 248: 87-101.
47. Wells DL, Coppersmith KL (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismolog Soc Am 84(4): 974-1002.