Differences in grip forces among various robotic instruments and da vinci surgical platforms

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 523-528

  Mucksavage, Phillip ^a   Kerbl, David C ^a   Pick, Donald L ^a   Lee, Jason Y ^a   Mcdougall, Elspeth M ^a   Louie, Michael K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INSTRUMENT; PINCH STRENGTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

HAND STRENGTH; MECHANICAL PHENOMENA; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 79952690499     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0306     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Intutive Surgical. Annual Report 2008-2009; Jan 29, 2010.
2. Brandina R, Gill IS. Robotic partial nephrectomy: New beginnings. Eur Urol 2010;57:778-779.
3. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, Dulabon LM, Patel MN, Lipkin M, Wang AJ, Stifelman MD. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: A multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 2009;182:866-872.
4. Vira MA, Richstone L. Robotic cystectomy: Its time has come. J Urol 2010;183:423-424.
5. Lee HJ, Box GN, Abraham JBA, et al. Laboratory evaluation of laparoscopic vascular clamps using a load-cell device-Are all clamps the same? J Urol 2008;180:1267-1272.
6. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel MB, Patel VR. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A review of current outcomes. BJU Int 2009;104:1428-1435.
7. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009;55:1037-1063.