Exemplary Professional Practice Through Nurse Peer Review

Journal of Pediatric Nursing

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 128-136

  Branowicki, Patricia ^a   Driscoll, Margaret ^a   Hickey, Patricia ^a   Renaud, Kristen ^a   Sporing, Eileen ^a  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Exemplary professional practice; Nursing practice; Peer review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING CARE; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PEER REVIEW; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

BOSTON; CHILD; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HOSPITALS, PEDIATRIC; HUMANS; NURSING CARE; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PROFESSIONAL STAFF COMMITTEES;

EID: 79952680391     PISSN: 08825963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2010.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Nurses Association Nursing: Scope and standards of practice 2004, American Nurses Association, Silver Spring, MD.
2. American Nurses Credentialing Center The Magnet Model components and sources of evidence: Magnet Recognition Program 2008, American Nurses Credentialing Center, Silver Spring, MD.
3. Beckman T.J., Lee M.C., Rohren C.H., Pankratz V.S. Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching. Medical Teacher 2003, 25:131-135.
4. Briggs, L. A., Heath, J., & Kelley, J. (2005). Peer review for advanced practice nurses, what does it really mean? AACN Clinical Issues: Advanced Practice in Acute & Critical Care, 16, 3-15, 23.
5. Bry K., Stettner B., Marks J. Patient safety: Through the eyes of your peers. Nursing Management 2006, 37:20-24.
6. Diaz L. Nursing peer review: Developing a framework for patient safety. Journal of Nursing Administration 2008, 38:475-479.
7. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 1966, 44:166-206.
8. Donabedian A. Definition of quality and approaches to its assessment: Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring, Vol 1 1980, Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
9. Donabedian A. The quality of care: How can it be assessed?. Journal of the American Medical Association 1988, 260:1743-1748.
10. Fradd L. Political leadership in action. Journal of Nursing Management 2004, 12:242-254.
11. Gantz N.R., Sorenson L., Howard R.L. A collaborative perspective on nursing leadership in quality improvement: The foundation for outcomes management and patient/staff safety in health care environments. Nursing Administration Quarterly 2003, 27:324-329.
12. Gunn I. A critique of Michael L. Millenson's book, Demanding medical excellence: Doctors and accountability in the information age, and its relevance to CRNAs and nursing. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists 1998, 66:575-582.
13. Hunt V.J. Implementing a nursing peer review process. Forum 2008, 14-15.
14. Institute of Medicine Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century 2001, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
15. Kelly J. Development and implementation of an external peer-review process. Journal of Healthcare Management 2005, 50:137-142.
16. Kenny K.J., Baker L., Lanzon M., Stevens L.R., Yancy M. An innovative approach to peer review for the advanced practice nurse-A focus on critical incidents. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 2008, 20:376-381.
17. Kirkman-Liff, B. (2002). Keeping an eye on a moving target: Quality changes and challenges for nurses. Nursing Economics, 20, 258-265, 290.
18. Kramer M., Schmalenberg C. Best quality patient care: A historical perspective on Magnet hospitals. Nursing Administration Quarterly 2005, 29:275-287.
19. Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 2003, 23:4-12.
20. Ministry of Health Toward clinical excellence: An introduction to clinical audit, peer review and other clinical practice improvement activities Retrieved from. http://www.moh.govt.nz.
21. Neilson, E. G., Johnson, K. B., Rosenbloom, S. T., Dupont, W. D., Talbert, D., Guise, D. A., et al. (2004). Improving patient care. The impact of peer management on test-ordering behavior. Annals of Internal Medicine, 141, 194-204, I57.
22. Pearson J.L., Lee J.L., Chang B.L., Elliot M., Rubenstein L.V. Structured implicit review: A new method for monitoring nursing care quality. Medical Care 2000, 31:1074-1091.
23. Steefel L. Peer review at its finest: New Jersey nurse leaders discuss latest practices in peer review process. Nursing Spectrum, New York & New Jersey edition 2008, 20A:8-9. Retrieved from. http://www.nurse.com.
24. The Joint Commission. (n.d.). Facts about the Joint Commission. Retrieved from http://www.jointcommission.org.