Nursing peer review: Developing a framework for patient safety

Journal of Nursing Administration

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 475-479

  Diaz, Lillian ^a  

^a NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DOCUMENTATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICATION ERROR; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NURSING; NURSING CARE; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PEER REVIEW; SAFETY; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL; CAUSALITY; COMMUNICATION; DATA COLLECTION; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (U.S.); MEDICATION ERRORS; MEDICATION SYSTEMS, HOSPITAL; MODELS, NURSING; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NEW YORK; NURSING CARE; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 58149172214     PISSN: 00020443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000339473.27349.28     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Kinnaman K. Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005. Orthop Nurs. 2007;26(1):14-18.
2. Institute of Medicine. To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academy Press; 2000.
3. Stow J. Using medical-error reporting to drive patient safety efforts. AORN J. 2006;84(3):406-408.
4. McBride D, Greening A, Redmond D. Path to safety: benefits of the 2005 Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act. Healthc Fin Manage. 2006;60(6):84-88.
5. Leonard M, Frankel A. Make safety a priority: create and maintain a culture of patient safety. Healthc Exec. 2006;21(2):12-14.
6. Mick MJ, Wood LG, Massey LR. The good catch pilot program: increasing potential error reporting. J Nurs Adm. 2007;37(11):499.
7. Clarke JR. How a system for reporting medical errors can and cannot improve patient safety. The American Surgeon [serial online]. November 2006.
8. Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority Issues Annual Report. PR Newswire. May 2006.
9. McFadden LK, Stock NG, Gowen RC. Exploring strategies for reducing hospital errors. J Healthc Manage. 2006;51(2):123-126.
10. Brous E. The criminalization of unintentional error: implications for TAANA. J Nurs Law. 2008;12(1):5-12.
11. Ellis J. Managing performance. Nurs Manage. 2008;15(1):28-33.
12. Bry K, Stettner B, Marks J. Patient safety: through the eyes of your peers. Nurs Manage. 2006:20-24.
13. Masso M. Peer review of adverse events. Australian Health Review [serial online]. September 2004.
14. Gentry BM. Registered nurse peer evaluation in the perioperative setting. AORN J. 2006;84(3):462-472.
15. Agee C. Improving the peer review process. Healthc Exec. 2007;22(3):72-73.
16. Blesch G. Peer review puzzle. Mod Healthc. 2008;38(2):17.
17. Mullan F. A founder of quality assessment encounters a troubled system firsthand. Health Aff. 2001;20(1):137-141.
18. Kalisch JB, Aebersold M. Overcoming barriers to patient safety. Nurs Econ. 2006;24(3):143-148.
19. Institute of Medicine. Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2005.
20. Elnitsky C, Nichol R, Palmer K. Are hospital incidents being reported? J Nurs Adm. 1997;27:40-46.
21. Institute of Medicine. Transforming Today's Healthcare Workforce to Meet Tomorrow's Demands. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2008.
22. Peraino AR. Holding the medical staff accountable for quality improvement. Trustee. 2002;55(9):24-25.