The effect of perceived surface orientation on perceived surface albedo in binocularly viewed scenes

Journal of Vision

Volumn 3, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 541-553

  Boyaci, H ^a   Maloney, L T ^a   Hersh, S ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Lightness; Perceived albedo

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; HUMAN; LIGHT; LUMINANCE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; RATING SCALE; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 3843083231     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/3.8.2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arend, L., & Reeves, A. (1986). Simultaneous color constancy, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 3, 1743-1751.
2. Bloj, M. G., Kersten D., & Hurlbert, A. C. (1999). Perception of three-dimensional shape influences colour perception through mutual illumination. Nature, 402, 877-879.
3. Cornsweet, T. (1970). Visual Perception. New York: Academic Press.
4. Epstein, W. (1961). Phenomenal orientation and perceived achromatic color. Journal of Psychology, 52, 51-53.
5. Flock, H. R., & Freedberg, E. (1970). Perceived angle of incidence and achromatic surface color. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 251-256.
6. Gilchrist, A. L. (1977). Perceived lightness depends on spatial arrangement. Science, 195, 185-187.
7. Gilchrist, A. L. (1980). When does perceived lightness depend on perceived spatial arrangement? Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 527-538.
8. Gilchrist, A., Kossyfidis, C., Bonato F., Agostini T., Cataliotti, J., Li, X. J., Spehar, B., Annan, V., & Economou, E. (1999). An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychological Review, 106, 795-834.
9. Hochberg, J. E., & Beck, J. (1954). Apparent spatial arrangements and perceived brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 263-266.
10. Kardos, L. (1934). Ding und Schatten; Eine Experimentelle Untersuchung über die Grundlagen des Farbsehens [Object and Shadow; An Experimental Investigation of the Fundamentals of Color Vision]. In F. Schumann, E.R. Jaensch, & O. Kroh (Eds.), Zeitschrift für psychologie and physiologie der sinnesorgane, ergänzungsband 23. Germany: Verlag.
11. Knill, D.C., & Kersten, D. (1991). Apparent surface curvature affects lightness perception. Nature, 351, 228-230.
12. Larson, G. W., and Shakespeare, R. (1996). Rendering with radiance; The art and science of lighting and visualization. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.
13. Maloney, L. T. (2002). Illuminant estimation as cue combination. Journal of Vision, 2(6), 493-504, http://journalofvision.org/2/6/6/, DOI 10.1167/2.6.6.
14. Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., & Boes, D. C. (1974). Introduction to the theory of statistics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Oren, M., & Nayar, S. K. (1995). Generalization of the Lambertian Model and implications for machine vision. International Journal of Computer Vision, 14, 227-251.
16. Nayar, S. K., & Oren, M. (1995). Visual appearance of matte surfaces. Science, 267, 1153-1156.
17. Pessoa, L., Mingolla, E., & Arend, L. E. (1996). The perception of lightness in 3-D curved objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1293-1305.
18. Redding, G. M., & Lester, C. F. (1980). Achromatic color matching as a function of apparent test orientation, test and background luminance, and lightness or brightness instructions. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 557-563.
19. Scheifler, R. W., & Gettys, J. (1996). X window system; Core library and standards. Boston: Digital Press.
20. Schirillo, J. A., & Shevell, S. K. (1993). Lightness and brightness judgments of coplanar retinal noncontiguous surfaces. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 10, 2442-2452.