The causes and consequences of internal control problems in nonprofit organizations

Accounting Review

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 325-357

  Petrovits, Christine ^a   Shakespeare, Catherine ^b   Shih, Aimee ^c  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Donors; Government grants; Internal control; Nonprofit organizations; Sarbanes Oxley

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952649183     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr.00000012     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2003. Audits of States, Local Governments and Not-For-Profit Organizations Receiving Federal Awards. New York, NY: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
2. -. 2009. Government Auditing Standards and Circular A-133 Audits. New York, NY: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
3. -. 2010. AICPA Professional Standards. New York, NY: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
4. Andreoni, J. 1990. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal 100 (401): 464-477.
5. -, and A. Payne. 2003. Do government grants to private charities crowd out giving or fund-raising? The American Economic Review 93 (3): 792-812. (Pubitemid 38799575)
6. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, and W. Kinney. 2007. The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 166-192.
7. -, -, -, and R. LaFond. 2009. The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies on firm risk and cost of equity. Journal of Accounting Research 47 (1): 1-43.
8. Atkinson, R. 1998. Unsettled standing: Who (else) should enforce the duties of charitable fiduciaries? The Journal of Corporation Law 23 (4): 655-700.
9. Baber, W., A. Roberts, and G. Visvanathan. 2001. Charitable organizations' strategies and program-spending ratios. Accounting Horizons 15 (4): 329-343.
10. Beneish, M., M. Billings, and L. Hodder. 2008. Internal control weaknesses and information uncertainty. The Accounting Review 83 (3): 665-703.
11. Bowman, W. 2006. Should donors care about overhead costs? Do they care? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 35 (2): 288-310. (Pubitemid 43679244)
12. Brown, K. 2007. Letter to Senator Charles E. Grassley from Acting Commissioner of IRS. Dated June 28, 2007. Available at: http://finance.senate. gov/press/Gpress/2007/prg072307a.pdf.
13. Dicker, R, and S. Goldenberg. 2009. Cuomo's pay-to-play rap for nonprofits. New York Post (October 23).
14. Doyle, J., W. Ge, and S. McVay. 2007a. Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 193-223.
15. Fama, E., and M. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics 26 (2): 301-325.
16. Fishman, J. 2003. Improving charitable accountability. Maryland Law Review 62: 218-287.
17. Fremont-Smith, M. 2007. The search for greater accountability of nonprofit organizations: Recent legal developments and proposals for change. Fordham Law Review 76: 609-646.
18. Ge, W., and S. McVay. 2005. The disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Accounting Horizons 19(3): 137-158. (Pubitemid 44769813)
19. Grassley, C. 2006. Strengthening the nonprofit sector. The Hill (July 12): 26.
20. Greenlee, J., and K. Brown. 1999. The impact of accounting information on contributions to charitable organizations. Research in Accounting Regulation 13: 111-125.
21. -, M. Fischer, T. Gordon, and E. Keating. 2007. An investigation of fraud in nonprofit organizations: Occurrences and deterrents. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36 (4): 676-694.
22. Hager, M., T. Pollak, and K. Wing. 2004. Getting what we pay for: Low overhead limits nonprofit effectiveness. Nonprofit Overhead Cost Project Brief No. 3. Available at: http://www.urban.org/publications/311044.html.
23. Hammersley, J., L. Myers, and C. Shakespeare. 2008. Market reactions to the disclosure of internal control weaknesses and to the characteristics of those weaknesses under Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Review of Accounting Studies 13 (1): 141-165.
24. Hansmann, H. 1981. Reforming nonprofit corporation law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 129: 497-623.
25. Heckman, J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1): 153-161.
26. Hogan, C., and M. Wilkins. 2008. Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (1): 219-242.
27. Irvin, R. 2005. State regulation of nonprofit organizations: Accountability regardless of outcome. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 34 (2): 161-178. (Pubitemid 40758839)
28. Iyer, V., and A. Watkins. 2008. Adoption of Sarbanes-Oxley measures by nonprofit organizations: An empirical study. Accounting Horizons 22 (3): 255-277.
29. Keating, E., M. Fischer, T. Gordon, and J. Greenlee. 2005. The Single Audit Act: How compliant are nonprofit organizations? Accounting and Financial Management 17 (3): 285-309.
30. Khanna, J., and T. Sandler. 2000. Partners in giving: The crowding-in effect of UK government grants. European Economic Review 44 (8): 1543-1556. (Pubitemid 30638945)
31. Khumawala, S., L. Parsons, and T. Gordon. 2005. Assessing the quality of not-for-profit efficiency ratios: Do donors use joint cost allocation disclosures? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 20 (3): 287-309. (Pubitemid 43530858)
32. Kitching, K. 2009. Audit value and charitable organizations. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 28 (6): 510-524.
33. Mulligan, L. 2007. What's good for the goose is not good for the gander: Sarbanes-Oxley-style nonprofit reforms. Michigan Law Review 105 (8): 1981-2009.
34. National Council of Nonprofits. 2009. Special state focus: Audit thresholds. Nonprofit Policy News (April). Available at: http://www. councilofnonprofits.org/?q=policynews/april2009#state.
35. Ogneva, M., K. Subramanyam, and K. Raghunandan. 2007. Internal control weakness and cost of equity: Evidence from SOX section 404 disclosures. The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1255-1297.
36. Okten, C., and B. Weisbrod. 2000. Determinants of donations in private nonprofit markets. Journal of Public Economics 75 (2): 255-272.
37. Ostrower, F. 2007. Nonprofit Governance in the United States: Findings on Performance and Accountability from the First National Representative Study. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
38. Posnett, J., and T. Sandler. 1989. Demand for charity donations in private non-profit markets: The case of the U.K. Journal of Public Economics 40 (2): 187-200.
39. PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2006. Internal control readiness: Why you need to act today. Available at: http://www.pwc.com.
40. Reiser, D. 2005. Enron.org: Why Sarbanes-Oxley will not ensure comprehensive nonprofit accountability. U.C. Davis Law Review 38: 205-280.
41. Ribar, D., and M. Wilhelm. 2002. Altruistic and joy-of-giving motivations in charitable behavior. The Journal of Political Economy 110 (2): 425-457. (Pubitemid 34476215)
42. Tinkelman, D. 1998. Difference in sensitivity of financial statement users to joint cost allocations: The case of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 13 (4): 377-394.
43. -. 2004. Using non-profit organization-level financial data to infer managers' fundraising strategies. Journal of Public Economics 88 (9-10): 2181-2192.
44. -, and K. Mankaney. 2007. When is administrative efficiency associated with charitable donations? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36 (1): 41-64.
45. Weisbrod, B., and N. Dominguez. 1986. Demand for collective goods in private nonprofit markets: Can fundraising expenditures help overcome free-rider behavior? Journal of Public Economics 30 (1): 83-95.
46. Wing, K., T. Poliak, and A. Blackwood. 2008. The Nonprofit Almanac. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
47. Yetman, M., 2008. Are donors misled by low quality financial reports? Working paper, University of California, Davis.