Efficiency of a mathematical model in generating CAD/CAM-partial crowns with natural tooth morphology

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 283-289

  Ender, Andreas ^a   Mörmann, Werner H ^a   Mehl, Albert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biogeneric tooth model; CAD CAM; Cerec; Occlusal surface

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTICS; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OCCLUSAL ADJUSTMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC; VERTICAL DIMENSION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952628718     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0384-z     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Neff P (1995) Trauma from occlusion. Restorative concerns. Dent Clin North Am 39: 335-354.
2. Türp JC, Greene CS, Strub JR (2008) Dental occlusion: a critical reflection on past, present and future concepts. J Oral Rehabil 35: 446-453.
3. Parker MW (1993) The significance of occlusion in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 37: 341-351.
4. Gher ME (1998) Changing concepts. The effects of occlusion on periodontitis. Dent Clin North Am 42: 285-299.
5. Dawson PE (1989) Occlusal therapy. In: Dawson PE (ed) Evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of occlusal problems. The C. V. Mosby Company, St. Louis, pp 14-17.
6. Christensen GJ (2004) Is occlusion becoming more confusing? A plea for simplicity. J Am Dent Assoc 135: 767-770.
7. Mörmann WH, Brandestini M (1989) Die Cerec computer reconstruction: inlays. Onlays und Veneers, Quintessenz, Berlin.
8. Mattiola A, Mörmann WH, Lutz F (1995) The computer-generated occlusion of Cerec-2 inlays and onlays. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 105: 1284-1290.
9. Jedynakiewicz NM, Martin N (2001) Functionally generated pathway theory, application and development in Cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent 4: 25-36.
10. De Nisco S, Mörmann WH (1996) Computer-generated occlusion of Cerec2 inlays and overlays. In: Mörmann WH (ed) Cad/Cim in aesthetic dentistry, Cerec 10 year anniversary symposium. Quintessence, Berlin, pp 391-407.
11. Fasbinder DJ (2006) Clinical performance of chairside Cad/Cam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 137(Suppl): 22S-31S.
12. Hartung F, Kordass B (2006) Comparison of the contact surface pattern between virtual and milled Cerec 3D full-ceramic crowns. Int J Comput Dent 9: 129-136.
13. Reich S, Troeltzsch M, Denekas WM (2004) Generation of functional Cerec 3D occlusal surfaces: a comparison of two production methods relevant in practice. Int J Comput Dent 7: 229-238.
14. Reich S, Wichmann M, Burgel P (2005) The self-adjusting crown (Sac). Int J Comput Dent 8: 47-58.
15. Mehl A, Blanz V, Hickel R (2005) Biogeneric tooth: a new mathematical representation for tooth morphology in lower first molars. Eur J Oral Sci 113: 333-340.
16. Mehl A, Blanz V (2005) New procedure for fully automatic occlusal surface reconstruction by means of a biogeneric tooth model. Int J Comput Dent 8(1): 13-25.
17. Mörmann WH (2006) The evolution of the Cerec system. J Am Dent Assoc 137(Suppl): 7S-13S.
18. Richter J, Mehl A (2006) Evaluation for the fully automatic inlay reconstruction by means of the biogeneric tooth model. Int J Comput Dent 9: 101-111.
19. Dunn M (2007) Biogeneric and user-friendly: the Cerec 3D software upgrade V3. 00. Int J Comput Dent 10: 109-117.
20. Morin MR (2006) Preparation, fabrication and 3D scanning to achieve esthetic results with chairside Cad/Cam technology. In: Mörmann WH (ed) State of the art Cad/Cam restorations: 20 years of Cerec. Quintessence, Berlin, pp 92-98.
21. Hansen S (2000) Preparations for Cerec 3: where are the limits. Int J Comput Dent 3: 197-205.
22. Cerec Team (2008) Cerec 3D preparations guidelines. Sirona - The Dental Company, Bensheim. http://www. sirona. com/ecomaXL/get_blob. php?name=cerec_3d_preparation_guidelines_en. pdf. Accessed 30 April 2009.
23. Reiss B (2007) Cerec standard 3-D occlusal contouring in comparison with the new biogeneric occlusal morphing: a case report. Int J Comput Dent 10: 69-75.
24. Reiss B (2003) Occlusal surface design with Cerec 3D. Int J Comput Dent 6: 333-342.
25. Bortz J, Lienert GA, Boehnke K (2000) Verteilungsfreie Methoden in Der Biostatistik. Springer, Berlin p, 929.
26. Fleiss JL (1981) The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC (eds) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, New York, p 321.
27. Reich SM, Peltz ID, Wichmann M, Estafan DJ (2005) A comparative study of two Cerec software systems in evaluating manufacturing time and accuracy of restorations. Gen Dent 53: 195-198.
28. Wurbs M, Simon JF, Troeltzsch M, Denekas T, Wichmann M, Reich S (2006) Dentist-time expenditure for two different adhesive all-ceramic systems. J Dent 34: 450-453.
29. Mehl A, Blanz V, Hickel R (2005) A new mathematical process for the calculation of average forms of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 94: 561-566.
30. Fasbinder DJ (2006) Predictable Cerec occlusal relationships. In: Mörmann WH (ed) State of the art of Cad/Cam restorations, 20 years of Cerec. Quintessenz, Berlin, pp 93-100.
31. Addi S, Hedayati-Khams A, Poya A, Sjogren G (2002) Interface gap size of manually and Cad/Cam-manufactured ceramic inlays/onlays in vitro. J Dent 30: 53-58.
32. Sjogren G (1995) Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study Acta Odontol Scand 53: 24-28.
33. Müller H (2006) FGP technique with Cerec 3D. Int J Comput Dent 9: 333-338.