Colon capsule endoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasms

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 257-261

  Sieg, Andreas ^a  

^a Practice of Gastroenterology   (Germany)

Author keywords

bowel preparation; capsule colonoscopy; colon capsule endoscopy; colon cleanliness; colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

BOWEL PREPARATION; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; COLON CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; COLON CLEANLINESS; COLONIC MUCOSA; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; GOLD STANDARDS; HIGH RATE; NONINVASIVE METHODS; OPTICAL COLONOSCOPY; SCREENING TESTS; SCREENING TOOL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

DISEASES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYETHYLENE OXIDES; TUMORS;

ENDOSCOPY;

LAXATIVE; MACROGOL;

CANCER SCREENING; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; COLON ADENOMA; COLON LAVAGE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79952613251     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: 17452422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/erd.10.84     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer statistics 2008. CA Cancer J. Clin. 58, 71-96 (2008).
2. [Guidelines of the Federal Board of Physicians and Health Insurances about the early detection of cancer diseases]. Dtsch. Ärztebl. 11, 518-521 (2002).
3. Sieg A, Theilmeier A. Results of colonoscopy screening in 2005 - an internet based documentation. Dtsch. Med. Wschr. 131, 379-383 (2006). (Pubitemid 43330175)
4. Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 1863-1872 (2006). (Pubitemid 44664644)
5. Knöpnadel J, Altenhofen L, Lichtner F, Brenner G. Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Possible Pre-Stages. Deutscher Ärzteverlag, Köln, Germany (2005).
6. Nakamura T, Terano A. Capsule endoscopy: past, present, and future. J. Gastroenterol. 43, 93-99 (2008). (Pubitemid 351344550)
7. Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM et al. Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy 38, 963-970 (2006). (Pubitemid 44641499)
8. Schoofs N, Devière J, van Gossum A. PillCam Colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective study. Endoscopy 38, 971-977 (2006). (Pubitemid 44615230)
9. Van Gossum A, Navas MM, Fernandez-Urien I et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 264-270 (2009).
10. Sieg A, Friedrich U, Sieg U. Is Pillcam Colon capsule endoscopy ready for colorectal cancer screening? A prospective feasibility study in a community practice. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 104, 848-854 (2009).
11. Spada C, Riccioni ME, Hassan C, Petruzziello L, Cesaro P, Costamagna G. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial comparing two regimens of preparation. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 45(2), 119-124 (2010).
12. Thomas G, Brozinsky S, Isenberg JI. Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced lavage solution (Golytely) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 82, 435-437 (1982). (Pubitemid 12174005)
13. DiPalma JA, Brady CE III. Colon cleansing for diagnostic and surgical procedures: polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 84, 1008-1016 (1989). (Pubitemid 19237985)
14. Davis GR, Santa Ana CA, Morawski SG, Fordtran JS. Inhibition of water and electrolyte absorption by polyethylene glycol (PEG).Gastroenterology 79, 35-39 (1980). (Pubitemid 11056931)
15. Brady CE III, DiPalma JA, Morawski SG, Santa Ana CA, Fordtran JS. Urinary excretion of polyethylene glycol 3350 and sulphate after gut lavage with a polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution. Gastroenterology 90, 1914-1918 (1986). (Pubitemid 16085598)
16. DiPiro JT, Michael KA, Clark BA et al. Absorption of polyethylene glycol after administration of a PEG-electrolyte lavage solution. Clin. Pharm. 5, 153-155 (1986). (Pubitemid 16161013)
17. Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ et al. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 103, 883-893 (2008). (Pubitemid 351501088)
18. Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (ADRAC).Electrolyte disturbances with oral phosphate bowel preparations. Aust. Advers. Drug React. Bull. 16, 86-93 (1987).
19. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E, Dubé C et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Gastrointestin. Endosc. 64, 544-552 (2006). (Pubitemid 44397052)
20. Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R et al.; Hintertux Study Group. A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*).Endoscopy 35, 300-304 (2003). (Pubitemid 36388809)
21. Pilz JB, Portmann S, Peter S, Beglinger C, Degen L. Colon capsule endoscopy compared to conventional colonoscopy under routine screening conditions. BMC Gastroenterol. 10, 66 (2010).
22. Gay G, Delvaux M, Frederic M, Fassler I. Could the colonic capsule PillCam Colon be clinically useful for selecting patients who deserve a complete colonoscopy?: results of clinical comparison with colonoscopy in the perspective of colorectal cancer screening. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 105, 1076-1088 (2010).
23. Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy 41, 1026-1031 (2009).
24. Rokkas T, Papaxoinis K, Triantafyllou K, Ladas SD. A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps. Gastrointest. Endosc. 71, 792-798 (2010).
25. Spada C, Hassan C, Marmot R et al. Meta-analysis shows colon capsule endoscopy is effective in detecting colorectal polyps. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 516-522 (2010).
26. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RW, Garewal HS. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest. Endosc. 37, 125-127 (1991).
27. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rate of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112, 24-28 (1997). (Pubitemid 27008981)
28. Shehadeh I, Rebala S, Kumar R, Markert RJ, Barde C, Gopalswamy N. Retrospective analysis of missed advanced adenomas on surveillance colonoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 97, 1143-1147 (2002). (Pubitemid 34478112)
29. Van Rijn RC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate detected by tandem colonoscopy: a systemic review. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 101, 343-350 (2006). (Pubitemid 43381678)
30. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365, 305-311 (2005). (Pubitemid 40139107)
31. Pickhardt PJ, Choie R, Hwang I et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 2191-2200 (2003). (Pubitemid 37485135)
32. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau PC et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms. JAMA 291, 1713-1719 (2004). (Pubitemid 38489893)
33. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AJ et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 1207-1217 (2008).
34. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer: a population-based, case-control study. Ann. Intern. Med. 150, 1-8 (2009).
35. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Haug U. Protection from right and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 102, 89-95 (2010).
36. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Adenoma detection rates and colonoscopic withdrawal times during screening colonoscopy. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 2533-2541 (2006). (Pubitemid 44917501)
37. Hassan C, Zullo A, Winn S, Morini S. Cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 40, 414-421 (2008). (Pubitemid 351696380)
38. Imaeda A, Bender D, Fraenkel L. What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening? J. Gen. Intern. Med. 25, 688-693 (2010).
39. Swain P. The future of wireless capsule endoscopy. World J. Gastroenterol. 14, 4142-4145 (2008).
40. Pohl J, Aschmoneit I, Schuhmann S, Ell C. Computed image modification for enhancement of small-bowel surface structures at video capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy 42, 490-492 (2010).
41. Li H, Yan G, Ma G. An active endoscopic robot based on wireless power transmission and electromagnetic localization. Int. J. Med. Robot. 4, 355-367 (2008).