Reducing delay in the diagnosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer: How imaging can help us

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 33-42

  Taylor, Donna ^a,b,d   Lazberger, Joanne ^a,d   Ives, Angela ^b   Wylie, Elizabeth ^a,c,d   Saunders, Christobel ^b  

^a ROYAL PERTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b School of Surgery (M507)   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d BreastScreen WA   (Australia)

Author keywords

breast cancer; imaging; lactation; pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISCHARGE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELAYED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LACTATION; LUNG CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTALGIA; METASTASIS; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, NEOPLASTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; WAITING LISTS;

EID: 79952584797     PISSN: 17549477     EISSN: 17549485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02227.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Sorosky JI, Scott-Conner CE,. Breast disease complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 353-63. (Pubitemid 28272327)
2. Gemignani ML, Petrek JA,. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: diagnosis and treatment. Breast J 2000; 6: 68-73. (Pubitemid 30204693)
3. Ives AD, Saunders CM, Semmens JB,. The Western Australian gestational breast cancer project: a population-based study of the incidence, management and outcomes. Breast 2005; 14: 276-82. (Pubitemid 41110188)
4. Keleher A, Theriault RL, Gwyn KM, et al. Multidisciplinary management of breast cancer concurrent with pregnancy. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 194: 54-64.
5. Gemignani ML, Petrek JA, Borgen PI,. Breast cancer and pregnancy. Surg Clin North Am 1999; 79: 1157-69. (Pubitemid 29483224)
6. American College of Radiology. Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). American College of Radiology, Reston, 1998.
7. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A,. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981; 47: 207-14. (Pubitemid 11167383)
8. Brennan M, French J, Houssami N, Kirk J, Boyages J,. Breast cancer in young women. Aust Fam Physician 2005; 34: 851-5.
9. Ahn BY, Kim HH, Moon WK, et al. Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 491-7. quiz 498-9. (Pubitemid 36528752)
10. Novotny DB, Maygarden SJ, Shermer RW, Frable WJ,. Fine needle aspiration of benign and malignant breast masses associated with pregnancy. Acta Cytol 1991; 35: 676-86.
11. Foxcroft LM, Evans EB, Porter AJ,. The diagnosis of breast cancer in women younger than 40. Breast 2004; 13: 297-306. (Pubitemid 39172730)
12. Heywang-Kobrunner S, Schreer I, Dershaw D,. Differential diagnosis and diagnostic work-up and the young patient. In:, Heywang-Kobrunner S, Schreer I, Dershaw D, (eds). Diagnostic Breast Imaging: Mammography, Sonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Interventional Procedures. Thieme, New York, 1997; 81-2. 384,391-403.
13. Kopans D,. The altered breast: pregnancy, lactation, biopsy, mastectomy, radiation, and implants. In:, Kopans D, (ed.). Breast Imaging, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1998; 445-7.
14. Max MH, Klamer TW,. Pregnancy and breast cancer. South Med J 1983; 76: 1088-90. (Pubitemid 13009373)
15. Bassett LW, Ysrael M, Gold RH, Ysrael C,. Usefulness of mammography and sonography in women less than 35 years of age. Radiology 1991; 180: 831-5.
16. Stomper PC, D'Souza DJ, DiNitto PA, Arredondo MA,. Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 1261-5. (Pubitemid 26376247)
17. Swinford AE, Adler DD, Garver KA,. Mammographic appearance of the breasts during pregnancy and lactation: false assumptions. Acad Radiol 1998; 5: 467-72. (Pubitemid 28303902)
18. Ingleby H, Moore L, Gershon-Cohen J,. Gestational breast changes; x-ray studies of the human breast. Obstet Gynecol 1957; 10: 149-57.
19. Yang WT, Dryden MJ, Gwyn K, Whitman GJ, Theriault R,. Imaging of breast cancer diagnosed and treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy. Radiology 2006; 239: 52-60.
20. Liberman L, Giess CS, Dershaw DD, Deutch BM, Petrek JA,. Imaging of pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Radiology 1994; 191: 245-8. (Pubitemid 24098239)
21. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 1773-83. (Pubitemid 41549889)
22. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1295-303. (Pubitemid 46513295)
23. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH,. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985; 56: 979-90. (Pubitemid 15003474)
24. Samuels TH, Liu FF, Yaffe M, Haider M,. Gestational breast cancer. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998; 49: 172-80. (Pubitemid 28340419)
25. National Breast Cancer Centre. Evidence Relevant to Guidelines for the Investigation of Breast Symptoms. National Breast Cancer Centre, Camperdown, 2006.
26. Kuhl CK,. Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 2007; 244: 672-91. (Pubitemid 47292079)
27. Talele AC, Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, Yeh ED, Kopans DB,. The lactating breast: MRI findings and literature review. Breast J 2003; 9: 237-40. (Pubitemid 36627172)
28. Espinosa LA, Daniel BL, Vidarsson L, Zakhour M, Ikeda DM, Herfkens RJ,. The lactating breast: contrast-enhanced MR imaging of normal tissue and cancer. Radiology 2005; 237: 429-36. (Pubitemid 41507876)
29. Gentilini O, Cremonesi M, Trifiro G, et al. Safety of sentinel node biopsy in pregnant patients with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1348-51. (Pubitemid 39295022)
30. Gupta R,. The diagnostic impact of aspiration cytodiagnosis of breast masses in association with pregnancy and lactation with the emphasis on clinical decision making. Breast J 1997; 3: 131-4.
31. Kline TS,. Masquerades of malignancy: a review of 4241 aspirates from the breast. Acta Cytol 1981; 25: 263-6. (Pubitemid 11104436)
32. Schackmuth EM, Harlow CL, Norton LW,. Milk fistula: a complication after core breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 961-2. (Pubitemid 23333152)