Neuronal event detection in fMRI time series using iterative deconvolution techniques

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 353-364

  Hernandez Garcia, Luis ^a   Ulfarsson, Magnus O ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

Deconvolution; Event detection; FMRI; L1 norm; Non negativity; Total variation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMODYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN MAPPING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURONS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79952538330     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. McKeown M.J., Makeig S. Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Hum Brain Mapp 1998, 6:160-188.
2. Calhoun V., Adali T., Stevens M., Kiehl K., Pekar J. Semi-blind ICA of fMRI: A method for utilizing hypothesis-derived time courses in a spatial ICA analysis. Neuroimage 2005, 25:527-538.
3. Calhoun V.D., Adali T., Pearlson G.D., Pekar J.J. Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task-related waveforms. Hum Brain Mapp 2001, 13:43-53.
4. Morgan V.L., Li Y., Abou-Khalil B., Gore J.C. Development of 2dTCA for the detection of irregular, transient BOLD activity. Hum Brain Mapp 2008, 29:57-69.
5. Salek-Haddadi A., Friston K.J., Lemieux L., Fish D.R. Studying spontaneous EEG activity with fMRI. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2003, 43:110-133.
6. Patel R., Bowman F., Rilling J. A Bayesian approach to determining connectivity of the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp 2006, 27:267-276.
7. Hernandez-Garcia L., Scott D.J., Ulfarsson M. A conditional probability approach to determine neuronal dominance from FMRI data. Hum Brain Mapp 2006, 503.
8. Tibshirani R., Saunders M., Rosset S., Zhu J., Knight K. Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B 2005, 67:91-108.
9. Stoica P., Selen Y. Cyclic minimizers, majorization techniques, and the expectation-maximization algorithm: a refresher. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2004, 21(1):112-114.
10. Heiser W. Convergent computation by iterative majorization, theory and application in multidimensional data analysis. Recent Advances in Descriptive Multivariate Analysis 1995, 157-189. Oxford University Press, New York. W.J. Krazanowski (Ed.).
11. Buckner R.L. Event-related fMRI and the hemodynamic response. Hum Brain Mapp 1998, 6:373-377.
12. Ciuciu P., Poline J.B., Marrelec G., Idier J., Pallier C., Benali H. Unsupervised robust nonparametric estimation of the hemodynamic response function for any fMRI experiment. Medical Imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003, 22:1235-1251.
13. Handwerker D.A., Ollinger J.M., D'Esposito M. Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. Neuroimage 2004, 21:1639-1651.
14. Menon R., Luknowsky D., Gati J. Mental chronometry using latency-resolved functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:10902-10907.
15. Miezin F.M., Maccotta L., Ollinger J.M., Petersen S.E., Buckner R.L. Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing. Neuroimage 2000, 11:735-759.
16. Riera J., Bosch J., Yamashita O., Kawashima R., Sadato N., Okada T., et al. fMRI activation maps based on the NN-ARx model. Neuroimage 2004, 23:680-697.
17. Glover G.H. Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related BOLD fMRI1. Neuroimage 1999, 9:416-429.
18. Penny W., Ghahramani Z., Friston K. Bilinear dynamical systems. Philos Trans R Soc London B Biol Sci 2005, 360:983-993.
19. Makni S., Beckmann C., Smith S., Woolrich M. Bayesian deconvolution of [corrected] fMRI data using bilinear dynamical systems. Neuroimage 2008, 42:1381-1396.
20. Tikhonov A.N. Solutions of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Sov Math 1963, 4:1035-1038.
21. Rudin L.I., Osher S., Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D Nonlinear Phenomen 1992, 60:259-268.
22. Claerbout J.F., Muir F. Robust modeling with erratic data. Geophysics 1973, 38:826-844.
23. Bioucas-Dias J., Figueiredo T., Oliveira J. Total variation-based image deconvolution: a majorization-minimization approach. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics and Speech Processing (ICASSP) 2006.
24. Purdon P.L., Weisskoff R.M. Effect of temporal autocorrelation due to physiological noise and stimulus paradigm on voxel-level false-positive rates in fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 1998, 6(4):239-249.
25. Boynton G., Engel S., Glover G., Heeger D. Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J Neurosci 1996, 16:4207-4221.
26. Wager T., Vazquez A., Hernandez L., Noll D. Accounting for nonlinear BOLD effects in fMRI: parameter estimates and a model for prediction in rapid event-related studies. Neuroimage 2005, 25:206-218.
27. Buxton R., Uludag K., Dubowitz D., Liu T. Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation. Neuroimage 2004, 23(Suppl 1):S220-S233.
28. Vazquez A.L., Cohen E.R., Gulani V., Hernandez-Garcia L., Zheng Y., Lee G.R., et al. Vascular dynamics and BOLD fMRI: CBF level effects and analysis considerations. Neuroimage 2006, 32:1642-1655.
29. Aguirre G.K., Zarahn E., D'Esposito M. The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage 1998, 8:360-369.
30. Donnet S., Lavielle M., Poline J.B. Are fMRI event-related response constant in time? A model selection answer. Neuroimage 2006, 31:1169-1176.
31. Lund T., Madsen K., Sidaros K., Luo W., Nichols T. Non-white noise in fMRI: does modelling have an impact?. Neuroimage 2006, 29:54-66.