What e-politicians do with words: Online communication between councillors and citizens

Information Polity

Volumn 13, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 233-248

  Edwards, Arthur ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

e deliberation; E democracy; online forum; style of representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952526403     PISSN: 15701255     EISSN: 18758754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/ip-2008-0150     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. J.L. Austin, How to do things with words, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1962.
2. S. Coleman and J. Gøtze, Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation, Hansard Society, London, 2001.
3. D. Davenport, Anonymity on the Internet: Why the price may be too high, Communications of the ACM, 45 (2002), 33-35. (Pubitemid 135700532)
4. A.R. Edwards, Communicative strategies in policy and planning situations: a theoretical framework based on the speech act theory, in: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation, F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard, eds, SICSAT, Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 828-833.
5. F.H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst, Speech acts in argumentative discussions, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, 1984.
6. B. Elvebakk, Virtually competent? Competence and experience with Internet-based technologies among European parliamentarians, Information Polity 9 (2004), 41-53.
7. L. Harris and V.R. Cronen, A rules-based approach for the analysis and evaluation of organizational communication, Communication Quarterly, winter 1979, 12-28.
8. J. Hoff, Members of parliaments' use of ICT in a comparative European perspective, Information Polity 9 (2004), 5-16.
9. J. Hoff, The democratic potentials of information technology: Attitudes of European MPs towards new technology, Information Polity 9 (2004), 55-66.
10. J.L. Jensen, Virtual democratic dialogue? Bringing together citizens and politicians, Information Polity 8 (2003), 29-47.
11. E.H. Klijn and J.F.M. Koppenjan, Politicians and interactive decision making: institutional spoilsports or playmakers, Public Administration 78 (2000), 365-387.
12. H. Mahrer and R. Krimmer, Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: identifying the notion of the 'middleman paradox', Info Systems Journal 15 (2005), 27-42. (Pubitemid 40163172)
13. H. Mahrer, Politicians as patrons for E-Democracy? Closing the gap between ideals and realities, International Journal of Electronic Government Research 1 (2005), 51-68.
14. K. Mitgaard, Rules and strategy in negotiations: notes on an institutionalist and intentionalist approach, European Journal of Political Research 11 (1983), 151-166.
15. W. Orlikowski, UsingTechnology and Constituting Structures: APractice Lens for StudyingTechnology in Organizations, Organization Science 11 (2000), 404-428.
16. Z. Papacharissi, Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups, New Media Society 6 (2004), 259-283. (Pubitemid 38430431)
17. J.R. Searle, Speech acts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1969.
18. J.R. Searle, Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979.
19. F. Spangenberg, M.A. Lampert, M. Moerland, H.M.H.Boerboom and B. van der Lelij, Burgerschapsstijlen en overheidscommunicatie, Motivaction, Amsterdam, 2001.
20. J. Taylor, Informatization as X-ray. What is Public Administration for the Information Age?, in: Public Administration in an Information Age. A Handbook, I.Th.M. Snellen and W.B.H.J. van de Donk, eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1998, pp. 21-32.
21. P. Tops and S. Zouridis, De binnenkant van de politiek, Atlas, Amsterdam, 2002.
22. H.R. van Gunsteren, A theory of citizenship. Organizing plurality in contemporary democracies,WestviewPress, Boulder, 1998.
23. S. Wright and J. Street, Democracy, Deliberation and Design: the case of online discussion forums, New media and Society 9 (2007), 849-869.
24. R.K. Yin, Case Study Research, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, 1984.