Fertilization decreases plant biodiversity even when light is not limiting

Ecology Letters

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 380-388

  Dickson, Timothy L ^a,b   Foster, Bryan L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

Drought; Eutrophication; Light manipulation; Old field; Plant species richness; Productivity biodiversity relationship; Seed sowing; Shade; Species pool; Temporal climate variability

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE EFFECT; DROUGHT; EUTROPHICATION; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LIGHT AVAILABILITY; OLD FIELD; PLANT COMMUNITY; SHADING; SOIL FERTILITY; SOWING; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CHEMISTRY; ECOSYSTEM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LIGHT; PLANT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SOIL; UNITED STATES;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; KANSAS; LIGHT; PLANTS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SOIL;

EID: 79952522424     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01599.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bakker, J.D., Wilson, S.D., Christian, J.M., Li, Z., Ambrose, L.G. & Waddington, J. (2003). Contingency of grassland restoration on year, site, and competition from introduced grasses. Ecol. Appl., 13, 137-153.
2. Callaway, R.M. & Walker, L.R. (1997). Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology, 78, 1958-1965.
3. Chase, J.M. & Leibold, M.A. (2002). Spatial scale dictates the productivity-biodiversity relationship. Nature, 416, 427-430.
4. Clark, C.M. & Tilman, D. (2008). Loss of plant species after chronic low-level nitrogen deposition to prairie grasslands. Nature, 451, 712-715.
5. Darwin, C.R. (1872). The Origin of Species, 6th edn. John Murray, London.
6. Davis, M.A., Wrage, K.J. & Reich, P.B. (1998). Competition between tree seedlings and herbaceous vegetation: support for a theory of resource supply and demand. J. Ecol., 86, 652-661.
7. Dickson, T.L. & Foster, B.L. (2008). The relative importance of the species pool, productivity and disturbance in regulating grassland plant species richness: a field experiment. J. Ecol., 96, 937-946.
8. DiTommaso, A. & Aarssen, L.W. (1989). Resource manipulations in natural vegetations: a review. Vegetatio, 84, 9-29.
9. Ehrlich, P.R. & Wilson, E.O. (1991). Biodiversity studies: science and policy. Science, 253, 758-761.
10. Foster, B.L., Khavin, I.S., Murphy, C.A., Smith, V.H., Ramspott, M.E., Price, K.P. et al. (2010). Integrated responses of grassland biodiversity and ecosystem properties to hay management: a field experiment. Trans. Kansas. Acad. Sci., 113, 103-119.
11. Goldberg, D.E. & Miller, T. (1990). Effects of different resource additions on species diversity in an annual plant community. Ecology, 71, 213-225.
12. Grace, J.B. (1990). On the relationship between plant traits and competitive ability. In: Perspectives on Plant Competition (eds Grace, J.B. & Tilman, D.). Academic Press, New York, pp. 51-65.
13. Grime, J.P. (1973). Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature, 242, 344-347.
14. Gross, K.L., Willig, M.R., Gough, L., Inouye, R. & Cox, S.B. (2000). Patterns of species density and productivity at different spatial scales in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos, 89, 417-427.
15. Hautier, Y., Niklaus, P.A. & Hector, A. (2009). Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication. Science, 324, 636-638.
16. Howard, D.J. & Berlocher, S.H. (eds) (1998). Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. Oxford University Press, New York.
17. Huston, M.A. (1994). Biological Diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Knapp, A.K., Beier, C., Briske, D.D., Classen, A.T., Luo, Y., Reichstein, M. et al. (2008). Consequences of more extreme precipitation regimes for terrestrial ecosystems. Bioscience, 58, 811-821.
19. Lamb, E.G., Kembel, S.W. & Cahill, J.F. (2009). Shoot, but not root, competition reduces community diversity in experimental mesocosms. J. Ecol., 97, 155-163.
20. Littell, R.C., Stroup, W.W. & Freund, R.J. (2002). SAS for Linear Models, 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
21. Mittelbach, G.G., Steiner, C.F., Scheiner, S.M., Gross, K.L., Reynolds, H.L., Waide, R.B. et al. (2001). What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology, 82, 2381-2396.
22. NDMC, USDA & NOAA (2011). U.S. Drought Monitor Archives [WWW database]. Available at: Last accessed 10 February 2011.
23. Newman, E.I. (1973). Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation. Nature, 244, 310.
24. Rabinowitz, D. & Rapp, J.K. (1980). Seed rain in a North American tall grass prairie. J. Appl. Ecol., 17, 793-802.
25. Rajaniemi, T.K. (2002). Why does fertilization reduce plant species diversity? Testing three competition-based hypotheses. J. Ecol., 90, 316-324.
26. Rajaniemi, T.K. (2003). Explaining productivity-diversity relationships in plants. Oikos, 101, 449-457.
27. Rajaniemi, T.K., Allison, V.J. & Goldberg, D.E. (2003). Root competition can cause a decline in diversity with increased productivity. J. Ecol., 91, 407-416.
28. Rosenzweig, M.L. & Abramsky, Z. (1993). How are diversity and productivity related? In: Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives (eds Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, pp. 52-65.
29. Sala, O.E., Chapin III, F.S., Armesto, J.J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R. et al. (2000). Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287, 1770-1774.
30. Stevens, M.H.H. (1999). Explaining Why Plant Species Richness Declines as Resource Availability Increases; Tests of the Important Hypotheses. PhD Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
31. Stevens, M.H.H. & Carson, W.P. (2002). Resource quantity, not resource heterogeneity, maintains plant diversity. Ecol. Lett., 5, 420-426.
32. Stevens, M.H.H., Bunker, D., Schnitzer, S.A. & Carson, W.P. (2004). Establishment limitation reduces species recruitment and species richness as soil resources rise. J. Ecol., 92, 339-347.
33. Suding, K.N. & Goldberg, D.E. (1999). Variation in the effects of vegetation and litter on recruitment across productivity gradients. J. Ecol., 87, 436-449.
34. Tilman, D. (1988). Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
35. Tilman, D. (1993). Species richness of experimental productivity gradients: how important is colonization limitation. Ecology, 74, 2179-2191.
36. Troeh, F.R. & Thompson, L.M. (2005). Soils and Soil Fertility, 6th edn. Ames, USA: Blackwell, 156 pp.
37. Vaughn, K.J. & Young, T.P. (2010). Contingent conclusions: year of initiation influences ecological field experiments, but temporal replication is rare. Restor. Ecol., 18, 59-64.
38. Vitousek, P.M., Aber, J.D., Howarth, R.W., Likens, G.E., Matson, P.A., Schindler, D.W. et al. (1997). Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol. Appl., 7, 737-750.
39. Waide, R.B., Willig, M.R., Steiner, C.F., Mittelbach, G., Gough, L., Dodson, S.I. et al. (1999). The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 30, 257-300.
40. Whitney, D.A. & Lamond, R.E. (1993). Liming Acid Soils. Extension publication MF-1065. Kansas, USA: Kansas State University. Available at: Last accessed 11 February 2011.
41. Williams, K., Caldwell, M.M. & Richards, J.H. (1993). The influence of shade and clouds on soil water potential: the buffered behavior of hydraulic lift. Plant Soil, 157, 83-95.
42. Wilson, S.D. & Tilman, D. (1993). Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology, 74, 599-611.