Quercus macranthera Fisch. & Mey. ex hohen. and Quercus iberica M. Bieb.: Taxonomic definition and systematic relationships with european oaks inferred from nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) data

Plant Biosystems

Volumn 145, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 37-49

  Papini, A ^a   Simeone, M C ^b   Bellarosa, R ^b   Spada, F ^c   Schirone, B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Caucasus; Glacial refugia; ITS sequences; Phylogeny; Quercus

Indexed keywords

FAGACEAE; MACRANTHERA; QUERCUS; QUERCUS CERRIS; QUERCUS FRAINETTO; QUERCUS IBERICA; QUERCUS MACRANTHERA; QUERCUS PETRAEA; QUERCUS PYRENAICA;

EID: 79952518994     PISSN: 11263504     EISSN: 17245575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2010.502684     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19: 716-723.
2. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 25: 3389-3402.
3. Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on Angiosperm phylogeny. Ann MO Bot Gard 82: 247-277.
4. Bellarosa R, Simeone MC, Papini A, Schirone B. 2005. Utility of ITS sequence data for phylogenetic reconstruction of Italian Quercus spp. Mol Phyl Evol 34:355-370.
5. Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
6. Brewer S, Cheddadi R, De Beaulieu J-L, Relle M, Data contributors. 2002. The spread of deciduous Quercus throughout Europe since the last glacial period. For Ecol Management 156: 27-48.
7. Browicz K. 1982. Chorology of trees and shrubs in south-west Asia and adjacent regions. Vol. 1. Warszawa/Poznan: Polish Scientific.
8. Burger WC. 1975. The species concept in Quercus. Taxon 24: 45-50.
9. Bussotti F, Grossoni P. 1997. European and Mediterranean oaks, Quercus L. (Fagaceae): SEM characterization of the micromorphology of the abaxial leaf surface. Bot J Linn Soc 124: 183-199.
10. Camus A. 1936-1954. Les Chenes. Monographie du genre Quercus and monographie du genre Lithocarpus. Encycl. Econ. de Sylvic., Vols. VI, VII, VIII. Paris: Lechevalier.
11. Coleman AW. 2003. ITS2 is a double-edged tool for eukaryote evolutionary comparisons. Trends Genet 19: 370-375.
12. Crepet WL, Nixon KK. 1989. Earliest megafossil evidence of Fagaceae: Phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. Am J Bot 76: 842-855.
13. Donoghue MJ. 1985. A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. Bryologist 88: 172-181.
14. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13-15.
15. Dumolin-Lapegue S, Demesure B, Fineschi S, Le Corre V, Petit RJ. 1997. Phylogeographic structure of white oaks throughout the European continent. Genetics 146: 1475-1487.
16. Eriksson T. 1999. AutoDecay, version 4.0. Stockholm, Sweden: Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
17. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17: 368-376.
18. Greuter W, Burdet HM, Long G. 1986. Med-Checklist 3: Dicotyledons, Convolvulaceae-Labiatae Editions des Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques, Genève.
19. Herschkowitz MA, Lewis LA. 1996. Deep-level diagnostic value of the rDNA-ITS region. Mol Biol Evol 13: 1276-1295.
20. Herschkowitz MA, Zimmer EA. 1996. Conservation patterns in Angiosperm rDNA-ITS2 sequences. Nucl Acids Res 24: 2857-2867.
21. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
22. Jiménez P, López de Heredia U, Collada C, Lorenzo Z, Gil L. 2004. High variability of chloroplast DNA in three Mediterranean evergreen oaks indicates complex evolutionary history. Heredity 93: 510-515.
23. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111-120.
24. King RA, Ferris C. 1998. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn Mol Ecol 7: 1151-1161.
25. Kishino H, Miyata T, Hasegawa M. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J Mol Evol 30: 151-160.
26. Kubitzki K. 1993. Fagaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer JG, Bittrich V, editors. The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 2. Berlin: Springer. pp. 301-309.
27. Kvacek Z, Walter H. 1989. Paleobotanical studies in Fagaceae of the European Tertiary. Plant Syst Evol 162:213-299.
28. Manos PS, Doyle JJ, Nixon KC. 1999. Phylogeny, biogeography and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Mol Phyl Evol 12: 333-349.
29. Manos PS, Zhou Z-K, Cannon CH. 2001. Systematics of Fagaceae: Phylogenetic tests of reproductive trait evolution. Int J Plant Sci 162: 1361-1379.
30. Mathews DH, Sabina J, Zuker M, Turner DH. 1999. Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. J Mol Biol 288: 911-940.
31. Mayer H, Aksoy H. 1986. Walder der Türkei. Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
32. Mayol M, Rossellò JA. 2001. Why nuclear ribosomal DNA spacers (ITS) tell different stories in Quercus. Mol Phyl Evol 19: 167-176.
33. Menitsky YL. 2005. Oaks of Asia. In: Fedorov AA, editor. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers.
34. Muir G, Fleming CC, Schlötterer C. 2001. Three divergent rDNA clusters predate the species divergence in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. Mol Biol Evol 18: 112-119.
35. Nakhutsrishvili G. 1999. Evergreen broad-leaved vegetation in the Colchis. In: Klötzli F, Walther G-R, editors. Recent shifts in vegetation boundaries of deciduous forests, especially due to general global warming. Basel: Birkhäuser. pp. 167-179.
36. Nixon KC. 1993. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Ann Sci For 50: 25s-34s.
37. Nixon KC, Crepet WL. 1989. Trigonobalanus (Fagaceae): Taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships. Am J Bot 6: 828-841.
38. Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest 2.0. Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
39. Petit RJ, Brewer S, Bordács S, Burg K, Cheddadi R, Coart E, Cottrell J, et al. 2002a. Identification of refugia and post-glacial colonization routes of European white oaks based on chloroplast DNA and fossil pollen evidence. For Ecol Manage 156: 49-74.
40. Petit RJ, Csaikl UM, Bordács S, Burg K, Coart E, Cottrell J, et al. 2002b. Chloroplast DNA variation in European white oaks: Phylogeography and patterns of diversity based on data from over 2600 populations. For Ecol Manage 156: 5-26.
41. Petit RJ, Pineau E, Demesure B, Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Kremer A. 1997. Chloroplast DNA footprints of postglacial recolonization by oaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 9996-10001.
42. Posada D, Crandall A. 1988. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
43. Rushton B. 1993. Natural hybridisation within the genus Quercus L. Ann Sci For 50: 73s-90s.
44. Schwarz O. 1936-1939. Monographie der Eichen Europas, besonders des Mittelmeergebietes. Feddes Rep., Sonderbeih. D, 1-200.
45. Schwarz O. 1964. Quercus L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Morre DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, editors. Flora Europaea 1. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 72-76.
46. Seddon JM, Santucci F, Reeve N, Hewitt GM. 2002. Caucasus Mountains divide postulated postglacial colonization routes in the white-breasted hedgehog, Erinaceus concolor. J Evol Biol 15: 463-467.
47. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of loglikelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16: 1114-1116.
48. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol 49: 369-381.
49. Swofford DL. 1998. PAUP* 4.1. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Test version. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
50. Tarkhnishvili DN, Thorpe RS, Arntzen JV. 2000. Pre-Pleistocene refugia and differentiation between populations of the Caucasian salamander (Mertensiella caucasica). Mol Phyl Evol 14: 414-422.
51. Templeton AR. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
52. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. ClustalW: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl Acids Res 22: 4673-4680.
53. Trelease W. 1924. The American oaks. Mem Natl Acad Sci 20: 1-255.
54. Van Valen L. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies and oaks. Taxonomy 25: 233-239.
55. Whittemore AT, Schaal BA. 1991. Interspecific gene flow in oaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 2540-2544.
56. Yaltirik F. 1984. Türkiye Meseleri Teshis kilavuzu (The oak trees of Turkey). Istanbul: Yenilik Basimevi.
57. Young ND, Healy J. 2003. GapCoder automates the use of indel characters in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinform 4: 6.
58. Zohary M. 1973. Geobotanical foundations of the Middle East. Vol. 1. Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
59. Zuker M. 1989. On finding all suboptimal foldings of an RNA molecule. Science 244: 48-52.
60. Zuker M, Mathews DH, Turner DH. 1999. Algorithms and thermodynamics for RNA secondary structure prediction: a practical guide. In: Barciszewski J, Clark BFC, editors. RNA biochemistry and biotechnology. NATO ASI Series. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. pp. 11-43.