Tailoring Foresight to field specificities

Futures

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 232-242

  Schoen, Antoine ^a   Könnölä, Totti ^b   Warnke, Philine ^c   Barré, Rémi ^d   Kuhlmann, Stefan ^e  

^a Universite Paris Est   (France)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^c FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

^d Bioinformatique et Chimie Moléculaire   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; RESEARCH; STRATEGIC APPROACH; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 79952486554     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bonaccorsi A. Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science. Minerva 2008, 46(3):285-315.
2. The Handbook of Technology Foresight: Concepts and Practice 2008, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA. L. Georghiou, J.C. Harper, M. Keenan, I. Miles, R. Popper (Eds.).
3. R. Barré, Synthesis of Technology Foresight, in: A. Tübke, K. Ducatel, J. Gavigan, P. Moncada-Paterno-Castello (Eds.), Strategic Policy Intelligence: Current Trends, The State of Play and Perspectives, S&T Intelligence for Policy-Making Processes, European Commission EUR 20137 EN, Sevilla, 2001.
4. Georghiou L. Third Generation Foresight - Integrating the Socio-economic Dimension 2001, Foresight Center of NISTEP, Tokyo, Japan.
5. Havas A. Terminology and Methodology for Benchmarking Foresight Programmes, For Society Transnational Foresight ERA-Net 2006.
6. Borup N., Brown N., Konrad K., van Lente H. The sociology of expectation in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2006, 18(3/4):285-298.
7. De Laat B. Scripts for the future: using innovation studies to Design Foresight Tools. Contested Futures. A Sociology of Prospective Techno-science 2000, Ashgate, Aldershot. N. Brown, B. Rappert, A. Webster (Eds.).
8. Da Costa O., Warnke P., Cagnin C., Scapolo F. The impact of Foresight on policy-making: insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2008, 20(3):369-387.
9. Eriksson E.A., Weber K.M. Adaptive Foresight: navigating the complex landscape of policy strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2008, 75(4):462-482.
10. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning 2009, Pinter, London. B.-T. Lundvall (Ed.).
11. Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change 1997, 6(1):83-118.
12. Geels F.W., Schot J. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 2007, 36(3):399-417.
13. Geels F.W. Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2005, 72(6):681-696.
14. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. In search of a useful theory of innovation. Research Policy 1977, 6(1):36-76.
15. Rip A., Kemp R. Technological change. Human Choice and Climate Change 1998, vol. 2. Batelle Press, Washington, DC.
16. Smith K. Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies 2000, 1(1):73-102.
17. Marsili O. The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries: Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics 2001, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA.
18. Georghiou L., Cassingena Harper J. Challenging Europe's Research - Rationales for the European Research Area (ERA) 2008, European Commission, Luxembourg.
19. Braun D. Special Issue on "The political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies" Science and Public Policy 2008, 35(4).
20. Brown N., Rappert B., Webster A. Foresight as a Tool for the Management of Knowledge Flows and Innovation (FORMAKIN). Available from the Science and Technology Studies Unit 2001, University of York, UK.
21. Grande E. The state and interest groups in a framework of multi-level decision-making: the case of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 1996, 3(3):318-338.
22. Kuhlmann S. Future governance of innovation policy in Europe - three scenarios. Research Policy 2001, 30(6):953-976.
23. Kaiser R., Prange H. Managing diversity in a system of multi-level governance: the open method of co-ordination in innovation policy. Journal of European Public Policy 2004, 11(2):249-266.
24. Barré R. Essai d'interprétation de l'évolution du SFRI: la réforme à la croisée des chemins. La Recherche et l'innovation en France 2007, Odile Jacob, Paris. J. Lesourne, D. Randet (Eds.).
25. Smits R., Kuhlmann S. The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 2004, 1(1/2):4-32.
26. Salo A., Könnölä T., Hjelt M. Responsiveness in Foresight management: reflections from the Finnish food and drink industry. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 2009, 1(1-2):70-88.
27. Könnölä T., Brummer V., Salo A. Diversity in Foresight: insights from the fostering of innovation ideas. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2007, 74(5):608-626.
28. Irvine J., Martin B.R. Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners 1984, Pinter Publ., London/Dover.
29. Arthur W.B. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal 1989, 99(394):116-131.
30. Arthur W.B. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy 1994, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
31. Jacobsson S., Johnson A. The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy Policy 2000, 28(9):625-640.
32. Salo A., Gustafsson T., Ramanathan R. Multicriteria methods for technology Foresight. Journal of Forecasting 2003, 22(2-3):235-255.
33. Keenan M. Identifying emerging generic technologies at the national level: the UK experience. Journal of Forecasting 2003, 22(2-3):129-160.
34. Martin B.R., Johnston R. Technology Foresight for Wiring up the National Innovation System. Experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand 1999.
35. Grabher G., Stark D. Organizing diversity: evolutionary theory, network analysis and postsocialism. Regional Studies 1997, 31(5):533-544.
36. Unruh G.C. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 2000, 28(12):817-830.
37. Tushman M.L., O'Reilly C.A. Winning through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal 1997, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
38. Könnölä T., Unruh G.C., Carrillo-Hermosilla J. Toward prospective voluntary agreements: reflections from a hydrogen Foresight project. Journal of Cleaner Production 2007, 15(3):259-265.
39. Cuhls K. From forecasting to Foresight processes - new participative Foresight activities in Germany. Journal of Forecasting 2003, 22(2-3):93-111.
40. Salmenkaita J.P., Salo A. Emergent Foresight processes: industrial activities in wireless communications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2004, 71(9):897-912.
41. Bonaccorsi A. Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science. Presentation at PRIME Annual Conference 2005 2005.
42. Bonaccorsi A. Explaining poor performance of European science: institutions versus policies. Science and Public Policy 2007, 34(5):303-316.
43. Kuhlmann S. ERA-Dynamics Project Strategic Report 2006-2007: Knowledge Dynamics, Institutions, and Policy in Europe 2008, PRIME Network of Excellence.
44. Schoen A., van den Besselaar P., Henriquez L., Larédo P., Pardo D. Search Regimes: Case Study on Chemistry (ERA Dynamics PRIME Project) 2009.
45. van den Besselaar P., Schoen A. Knowledge Dynamics: a network analytical approach. Presentation at the Conference "Knowledge for Growth: European Strategies in Global Economy" 2008.
46. Kahane B., Delemarle A., Villard L., Larédo P. Knowledge Dynamics and agglomeration phenomena: the case of nanotechnology. Presentation at the 2nd PRIME Indicators Conference on STI Indicators for Policy - Addressing New Demands of Stakeholders 2008.
47. Bonaccorsi A. The dynamics of science in the nano field and the changing relation between discovery and invention. Presentation at the PRIME Winter School on Emerging Nanotechnologies 2008.
48. Bonaccorsi A., Thoma G. Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology. Research Policy 2007, 36(6):813-831.
49. Rip A., te Kulve H. Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Scenarios 2008.
50. Rip A. Folk theories of nanotechnologists. Science as Culture 2006, 15(4):349-365.
51. Swierstra T., Rip A. Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. NanoEthics 2007, 1(1):3-20.