Identifying emerging generic technologies at the national level: The UK experience

Journal of Forecasting

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 129-160

  Keenan, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Prioritization; Science and technology policy; Selectivity; Technology foresight

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; PUBLIC POLICY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TECHNOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

GENERIC TECHNOLOGIES; PRIORITIZATION; TECHNOLOGY FORESIGHT;

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

EID: 0037345746     PISSN: 02776693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/for.849     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ACARD. 1986. Exploitable Areas of Science. HMSO: London.
2. Anderson J, Williams N. 1995. Foresight in Science-An experiment in the field of cardiovascular research, PRISM (Wellcome Trust) Report No. 3.
3. Georghiou L. 1996. The UK Technology Foresight Programme. Futures 28(4): 359-377.
4. Irvine J, Martin B. 1984. Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners. Pinter: London.
5. Keenan M. 2000. An Evaluation of the Implementation of the UK Technology Foresight Programme, PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
6. Keenan M. 2003. Technology Foresight: Implementation and Evaluation in the UK. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
7. Loveridge D, Georghiou L, Nedeva M. 1995. UK Technology Foresight Programme Delphi Survey, PREST report to the OST, University of Manchester.
8. Martin B. 1993. Research Foresight and the Exploitation of the Science Base. HMSO: London.
9. Martin B. 1995. Foresight in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 7: 139-168.
10. Martin B, Irvine J. 1989. Research Foresight. Pinter: London.
11. Nedeva M, Georghiou L, Loveridge D, Cameron H. 1996. Experts for Foresight-the use of co-nomination to identify experts to participate in the United Kingdom Technology Foresight Programme. R&D Management 26(2).
12. OST (Office of Science and Technology). 1993. Realising our Potential: A Strategy for Science, Engineering and Technology. Cmnd 2250. HMSO: London.
13. OST. 1995. Progress Through Partnership-Report from the Steering Group of the Technology Foresight Programme. HMSO: London.
14. OST. 1996. Winning Through Foresight: A strategy taking the Foresight Programme to the Millennium. Dept of Trade and Industry (DTI): London.
15. OST. 2001. Messages from the Current Round. Foresight Steering Group Report, Dept of Trade and Industry (DTI): London.
16. PA Consulting, PREST, SPRU, ISI. 1992. The Identification of Emerging Generic Technologies - a methodology for the UK, Report prepared for OST/DTI.
17. Shepherd J. 1995. Technology Foresight: A Delphic experience? Science and Public Affairs Autumn.
18. SQW (Segal Quince Wickstead), PREST. 1994. Prioritisation criteria. A paper to the UK Technology Foresight Steering Group.
19. Tegart G. 1997. A review of Australian experience with Foresight studies and priority setting. Nexus Paper 2/97. University of Canberra.
20. Walshe G. 1996. Technology Foresight in the UK. STI Review 17: 177-189. OECD: Paris.
21. Weinberg A. 1963. Criteria for scientific choice. Minerva 1(2).