Reml-based diallel analysis

Crop Science

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 470-478

  Mohring J ^a   Melchinger, A E ^a   Piepho, H P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952481994     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: 14350653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2010.05.0272     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Akaike, H. 1974. New look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. AC-19:716-723.
2. Baker, R.J. 1978. Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Sci. 18:533-536.
3. Chai, F.S., and R. Mukerjee. 1999. Optimal design for diallel crosses with specific combining abilities. Biometrika 86:453-458.
4. Cockerham, C.C., and B.S. Weir. 1977. Quadratic analyses of reciprocal crosses. Biometrics 33:187-203.
5. Curnow, R.N. 1980. Selecting crosses using information from a diallel cross. Biometrics 36:1-8.
6. Davik, J., and B.I. Honne. 2005. Genetic variance and breeding values for resistance to a wind-borne disease [Sphaerotheca macularis (Wallr. ex Fr.)] in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) estimated by exploring mixed and spatial models and pedigree information. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111:256-264.
7. Dey, A., and C.K. Midha. 1996. Optimal block designs for diallel crosses. Biometrika 83:484-489.
8. Edwards, J.W., and J.-L. Jannink. 2006. Bayesian modeling of heterogeneous error and genotype by environment interaction variances. Crop Sci. 46:820-833.
9. Fischer, S., J. Möhring, H.P. Maurer, H.-P. Piepho, E.-M. Thiemt, C.C. Schön, A.E. Melchinger, and J.C. Reif. 2009. Impact of genetic divergence on the ratio of variance due to specific versus general combining ability in winter triticale. Crop Sci. 49:2119-2122.
10. Frisch, M., A. Thielmann, J. Fu, T.A. Schrag, S. Scholten, and A.E. Melchinger. 2010. Transcriptome-based distance measures for grouping of germplasm and prediction of hybrid performance in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120:441-450.
11. Gardner, C.O., and S.A. Eberhart. 1966. Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics 22:439-452.
12. Gilbert, N.E.G. 1958. Diallel cross in plant breeding. Heredity 12:477-492.
13. Gilmour, A.R., B.J. Gogel, B.R. Cullis, and R. Thompson. 2006. ASReml user guide. VSN Int., Hemel Hempstead, UK.
14. Gupta, S., and S. Kageyama. 1994. Optimal complete diallel crosses. Biometrika 81:420-424.
15. Griffing, B. 1956a. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9:463-493.
16. Griffing, B. 1956b. A generalised treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance. Heredity 1:31-50.
17. Hayes, J.D., and R.S. Paroda. 1974. Parental generation in relation to combining ability analysis in spring barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 44:373-377.
18. Hayman, B.I. 1954. The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics 10:235-244.
19. Henderson, C.R., and R.L. Quaas. 1976. Multiple trait evaluation using relatives' records. J. Anim. Sci. 43:1188-1197.
20. Isik, F., D.D. Boos, and B. Li. 2005. The distribution of genetic parameter estimates and confidence intervals from small disconnected diallels. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:1236-1243.
21. Kempthorne, O., and R.N. Curnow. 1961. The partial diallel cross. Biometrics 17:229-250.
22. Keuls, M., and F. Garretsen. 1977. A general method for the analysis of genetic variation nine complete diallels and North Carolina II designs. Part 1: Procedures and general formulas for the random model. Euphytica 26:537-551.
23. Lonnquist, J.H., and C.O. Gardner. 1961. Heterosis in inter-varietal crosses in maize and its implications in breeding procedures. Crop Sci. 1:179-183.
24. Morley-Jones, R. 1965. Analysis of variance on the half diallel table. Heredity 20:117-121.
25. Murray, L.W., I.M. Ray, H. Dong, and A. Segovia-Lerma. 2003. Clarification and reevaluation of population-based diallel analysis: Gardner and Eberhart Analysis II and III revisited. Crop Sci. 43:1930-1937.
26. Patterson, H.D. 1997. Analysis of series of variety trials. p. 139-161. In R.A. Kempton and P.N. Fox (ed.) Statistical methods for plant variety evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London.
27. Piepho, H.-P. 2009. Ridge regression and extensions for genomewide selection in maize. Crop Sci. 49:1165-1176.
28. Piepho, H.-P., J. Möhring, A.E. Melchinger, and A. Büchse. 2008. BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161:209-228.
29. Piepho, H.-P., and E.R. Williams. 2006. A comparison of experimental designs for selection in breeding trials with nested treatment structure. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113:1505-1513.
30. Piepho, H.-P., E.R. Williams, and M. Fleck. 2006. A note on the analysis of designed experiments with complex treatment structure. HortScience 41:446-452.
31. Pooni, H.S., J.L. Jinks, and R.H. Singh. 1984. Methods of analysis and estimation of genetic parameters from a diallel set of crosses. Heredity 52:243-253.
32. Rao, C.R. 1970. Estimation of heteroscedastic variances in linear models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 65:161-172.
33. Rao, C.R. 1971. Estimation of variance and covariance components-MINQUE theory. J. Multivariate Anal. 1:257-275.
34. SAS Institute Inc. 2009. SAS/STAT user's guide. 2nd ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
35. Singh, O., and R.S. Paroda. 1984. A comparison of different diallel analyses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67:541-545.
36. Smith, A.B., B.R. Cullis, and A.R. Gilmour. 2001. The analysis of crop variety evaluation data in Australia. Austr. N. Z. J. Stat. 43:129-145.
37. Singh, M., and R.K. Singh. 1984. A comparison of different methods of half-diallel analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67:323-326.
38. Stram, D.O., and J.W. Lee. 1994. Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50:1171-1177.
39. Theobald, C.M., M. Talbot, and F. Nabugoomu. 2002. Bayesian approach to prediction from crop trials. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 7:403-419.
40. Walters, D.E., and J.R. Morton. 1978. On the analysis of variance of a half diallel table. Biometrics 34:91-94.
41. Wricke, G., and W.E. Weber. 1986. Quantitative genetics and selection in plant breeding. De Gruyter, Berlin.
42. Wright, A.J. 1985. Diallel designs, analyses, and reference populations. Heredity 54:307-311.
43. Wu, H., and A.C. Matheson. 2001. Analyses of half-diallel mating designs with missing crosses: Theory and SAS program for testing and estimating GCA and SCA variance components. Silvae Genet. 50:265-271.
44. Xiang, B., and B.L. Li. 2001. A new mixed analytical method for genetic analysis of diallel data. Can. J. For. Res. 31:2252-2259.
45. Yu, J., G. Pressoir, W.H. Briggs, I.V. Bi, M. Yamasaki, J.F. Doebley, M.D. McMullen, B.S. Gaut, D.M. Nielsen, J.B. Holland, S. Kresovich, and E.S. Buckler. 2006. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38:203-208.
46. Zhang, Y., and M.S. Kang. 1997. DIALLEL-SAS: A SAS program for Griffing's diallel analyses. Agron. J. 89:176-182.
47. Zhang, Y., M.S. Kang, and K.R. Lamkey. 2005. DIALLEL-SAS05: A comprehensive program for Griffing's and Gardner-Eberhart Analyses. Agron. J. 97:1097-1106.
48. Zhu, J., and B.S. Weir. 1994. Analysis of cytoplasmic and maternal effects. II. Genetic model for triploid endosperms. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89:160-166.
49. Zhu, J., and B.S. Weir. 1996a. Diallel analysis for sex-linked maternal effects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:1-9.
50. Zhu, J., and B.S. Weir. 1996b. Mixed model approaches for diallel analysis based on a bio-model. Genet. Res. 68:233-240.